Article

Features of Unstable Carotid Plaque During and After the Hyperacute Period Following TIA/Stroke

Vascular Surgery Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK. Electronic address: .
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.07). 12/2012; 45(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.11.023
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The aim was to test the hypothesis that histologically unstable carotid plaque features were more prevalent in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the acute period after onset of symptoms and that the plaque would assume more stable histological characteristics as the delay from the most recent event increased. METHODS: Seven histological features of plaque instability (haemorrhage, large lipid core, chronic plaque inflammation, chronic cap inflammation, marked vascularity, cap rupture and many foam cells) were independently quantified and then correlated with recency of symptoms in patients undergoing CEA. RESULTS: In patients undergoing CEA ≤14 days of their last event, 87/119 (73%) exhibited ≥5/7 unstable histological plaque features, compared with 22/40 (55%) of patients undergoing delayed surgery (P = 0.048). As expected, there was a sustained decline in the prevalence of unstable plaque features in 61 patients undergoing surgery between days 7-28. However, there was then a marked increase in the prevalence of plaque haemorrhage (59% up to 65%), large lipid core (41% up to 78%), chronic plaque inflammation (71% up to 91%), cap rupture (35% up to 39%), many foam cells (24% up to 43%) and marked vascularity (71% up to 91%) in 23 patients undergoing CEA after 29 days had elapsed. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgery ≤14 days had a significantly higher overall burden of high risk plaque features compared with those undergoing delayed CEA. However, the secondary upsurge across a range of unstable plaque features in patients undergoing CEA after ≥29 days had elapsed suggests that the relationship between recency of symptoms and plaque histology is more complex than had been anticipated in previous studies.

0 Followers
 · 
99 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite a decline during the recent decades in stroke-related death, the incidence of stroke has remained unchanged or slightly increased, and extracranial carotid artery stenosis is implicated in 20%-30% of all strokes. Medical therapy and risk factor modification are first-line therapies for all patients with carotid occlusive disease. Evidence for the treatment of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis greater than 70% with either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is compelling, and several trials have demonstrated a benefit to carotid revascularization in the symptomatic patient population. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is more controversial, with the largest trials only demonstrating a 1% per year risk stroke reduction with CEA. Although there are sufficient data to advocate for aggressive medical therapy as the primary mode of treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis, there are also data to suggest that certain patient populations will benefit from a stroke risk reduction with carotid revascularization. In the United States, consensus and practice guidelines dictate that CEA is reasonable in patients with high-grade asymptomatic stenosis, a reasonable life expectancy, and perioperative risk of less than 3%. Regarding CAS versus CEA, the best-available evidence demonstrates no difference between the two procedures in early perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, and no difference in 4-year ipsilateral stroke risk. However, because of the higher perioperative risks of stroke in patients undergoing CAS, particularly in symptomatic, female, or elderly patients, it is difficult to recommend CAS over CEA except in populations with prohibitive cardiac risk, previous carotid surgery, or prior neck radiation. Current treatment paradigms are based on identifying the magnitude of perioperative risk in patient subsets and on using predictive factors to stratify patients with high-risk asymptomatic stenosis.
    Vascular Health and Risk Management 07/2014; 10:403-416. DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S48923
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Determining plaque vulnerability is critical when selecting the most suitable treatment for patients with atherosclerotic plaque. Currently, clinical non-invasive ultrasound-based methods for plaque characterization are limited to visual assessment of plaque morphology and new quantitative methods are needed. In this study, shear wave elastography (SWE) was used to characterize hard and soft plaque mimicking inclusions in six common carotid artery phantoms by using phase velocity analysis in static and dynamic environments. The results were validated with mechanical tensile testing. In the static environment, SWE measured a mean shear modulus of 5.8 ± 0.3 kPa and 106.2 ± 17.2 kPa versus 3.3 ± 0.5 kPa and 98.3 ± 3.4 kPa measured by mechanical testing in the soft and hard plaques respectively. Furthermore, it was possible to measure the plaques’ shear moduli throughout a simulated cardiac cycle. The results show good agreement between SWE and mechanical testing and indicate the possibility for in vivo arterial plaque characterization using SWE.
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 03/2015; 60(8-8):3151. DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/3151 · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Stroke 01/2014; 45(3). DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004393 · 6.02 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
22 Downloads
Available from
Jul 17, 2014