Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: Issues and examples.

Adam Wright, David W Bates, Blackford Middleton, Tonya Hongsermeier, Vipul Kashyap, Sean M Thomas, Dean F Sittig

Clinical Informatics Research & Development, Partners Healthcare System, 93 Worcester St., Wellesely, Boston, MA 02481, USA; Division of General Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Journal Article: Journal of Biomedical Informatics (impact factor: 2.43). 11/2008; DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.09.003

Abstract

Clinical decision support is a powerful tool for improving healthcare quality and patient safety. However, developing a comprehensive package of decision support interventions is costly and difficult. If used well, Web 2.0 methods may make it easier and less costly to develop decision support. Web 2.0 is characterized by online communities, open sharing, interactivity and collaboration. Although most previous attempts at sharing clinical decision support content have worked outside of the Web 2.0 framework, several initiatives are beginning to use Web 2.0 to share and collaborate on decision support content. We present case studies of three efforts: the Clinfowiki, a world-accessible wiki for developing decision support content; Partners Healthcare eRooms, web-based tools for developing decision support within a single organization; and Epic Systems Corporation's Community Library, a repository for sharing decision support content for customers of a single clinical system vendor. We evaluate the potential of Web 2.0 technologies to enable collaborative development and sharing of clinical decision support systems through the lens of three case studies; analyzing technical, legal and organizational issues for developers, consumers and organizers of clinical decision support content in Web 2.0. We believe the case for Web 2.0 as a tool for collaborating on clinical decision support content appears strong, particularly for collaborative content development within an organization.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

case studies
 
Clinical decision support
 
clinical decision support content
 
clinical decision support systems
 
comprehensive package
 
decision support content
 
decision support interventions
 
Epic Systems Corporation's Community Library
 
healthcare quality
 
online communities
 
organizational issues
 
Partners Healthcare eRooms
 
powerful tool
 
sharing decision support content
 
single clinical system vendor
 
single organization
 
Web 2.0 framework
 
Web 2.0 methods
 
Web 2.0 technologies
 
world-accessible wiki