Field experiment estimate of electoral fraud in Russian parliamentary elections

New Economic School, Moscow 117418, Russia.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 12/2012; 110(2). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206770110
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Electoral fraud is a widespread phenomenon, especially outside the developed world. Despite abundant qualitative and anecdotal evidence on its existence from around the world, there is very limited quantitative evidence on the extent of electoral fraud. We exploit random assignment of independent observers to 156 of 3,164 polling stations in the city of Moscow to estimate the effect of electoral fraud on the outcome of the Russian parliamentary elections held on December 4, 2011. We estimate the actual share of votes for the incumbent United Russia party to be at least 11 percentage points lower than the official count (36% instead of 47%). Our results suggest that the extent of the fraud was sufficient to have had a substantial impact on the outcome of the elections; they also confirm that the presence of observers is an important factor in ensuring the integrity of the procedure.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines the effects exerted by different seat allocation methods upon legislative fragmentation, conventionally operationalized as the effective number of parliamentary parties (ENPP), in proportional representation systems. A real-life data set of 191 sub-national elections held in Russia in 2001-13 is used to assess relatively restrictive methods, Imperiali and d'Hondt highest averages, against a more permissive method, Hare largest remainders. Statistical analysis demonstrates that if fragmentation in the electorate and the amount of wasted votes are properly controlled for, the effects of proportional seat allocation rules can be assessed with a high degree of precision. The Imperiali method reduces the ENPP by 0.34 in comparison with the Hare method, while the d'Hondt method makes it smaller by 0.12. Restrictive seat allocation rules suppress legislative fragmentation primarily because they lead to the over-representation of major parties.
    03/2014; 16(2):178-193. DOI:10.1080/23745118.2014.974342
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: After several decades of institutionalization of political science as a scholarly discipline in Russia, its quantitative output is quite impressive. This article offers a critical reconsideration of its substantive impact on scholarship in political science – and considers why that output has not been so impressive in terms of increasing knowledge about politics, both in Russia and beyond. It presents an overview of the state of Russian political science, with an emphasis on its major theoretical, methodological, and empirical shortcomings. It also considers the role of historical, institutional, and political factors for its developmental trajectory, and offers some suggestions for overcoming them.
    European Political Science 03/2015; 14(1). DOI:10.1057/eps.2014.33 · 0.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We hypothesized that if election results are manipulated or forged, then, due to the well-known human attraction to round numbers, the frequency of reported round percentages should be increased. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed raw data from seven federal elections held in the Russian Federation during the period from 2000 to 2012 and found that in all elections since 2004 the number of polling stations reporting turnout and/or leader's result expressed by an integer percentage (as opposed to a fractional value) was much higher than expected by pure chance. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed high statistical significance of the observed phenomenon thereby proving its man-made nature. Geographical analysis showed that this anomaly was concentrated in a specific subset of Russian regions which strongly suggests its orchestrated origin. Unlike previously suggested statistical indicators of alleged electoral falsifications, our observations could hardly be explained differently but by a widespread election fraud, with high integer percentages serving as explicit goals for polling station performance.