La evaluacion del desarrollo profesional docente: de la cantidad a la calidad

Revista Brasileira de Formação de Professores 01/2009; 1.
Download full-text


Available from: Carlos Marcelo, Jun 29, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research spanning more than two decades points to the benefits of vigorous collegial communities, yet relatively little research examines specifically how professional communities supply intellectual, social and material resources for teacher learning and innovations in practice. This paper examines the theory-building potential of audio- and videotaped records of situated interaction among teachers in the course of everyday work. The paper employs a small segment of a larger data set to chronicle analytic dilemmas and opportunities and to introduce a scheme for theorizing about the nature and significance of professional community for teacher development and school reform.
    Teaching and Teacher Education 11/2002; 18(8-18):917-946. DOI:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This report examines effects of structural and process features of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice and efficacy. It is based on four recent (2002-2003) studies undertaken through the Australian Government Quality Teacher Programme, designed to enhance teacher quality. The total data set for the survey study includes 3,250 teachers who had participated in eighty individual professional development1 activities within these studies. Teachers were surveyed at least three months after participating in an activity, which provided them with the opportunity to gauge the impact of programs on their practice. To investigate factors affecting impact, a theoretical model was developed based on recent research into the characteristics of effective professional development and tested using blockwise regression analysis. The model included contextual factors (e.g., school support), structural features of programs (e.g. ,length), process features (e.g., emphasis on content; active learning; examination of student work; feedback; follow-up), a mediating variable (level of professional community generated), and four outcome measures (knowledge; practice; student learning and efficacy). Consistent significant direct effects were found across the four studies for the impact of content focus, active learning, and follow-up on knowledge and professional community. Feedback was rarely incorporated into program design. Impact on efficacy was strongly related to the perceived impact of activities on teachers' practice and student learning outcomes.
    Education Policy Analysis Archives 01/2005; 13. DOI:10.14507/epaa.v13n10.2005
  • Source
    Teachers College Record 12/2001; 103(6). DOI:10.1111/0161-4681.00141