Fossil Folklore from India: The Siwalik Hills and the Mahâbhârata

Folklore 04/2008; 119(1):71-92. DOI: 10.1080/00155870701806225


All over the world, from antiquity to the present, people have often explained fossil discoveries as proof of the historical truth of legends and myths, or used them as a basis for a new legend. Most often, large vertebrate fossils have been explained as bones and teeth of giant humans, dragons and monsters, saints and heroes. Smaller invertebrate fossils were often interpreted as sacred or curious relics based upon their resemblance to familiar or sacred objects. India is no exception to this practice. Fossil ammonites (salagramas), for example, are worshipped as the disc (chakra) of the Hindu god Vishnu. The Siwalik Hills, below the Himalayas, are strewn with impressive Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate fossils. This paper suggests that the region was seen as the historical stage for the legendary battle as described in the Indian epic Mahâbhârata, during which hundreds of mighty, and sometimes gigantic, heroes, horses, and war elephants are said to have died. Their remains are seen in the fossil bones, skulls, jaws, and tusks of hippopotamuses (Hexaprotodon), proboscideans (Stegodon, Archidiskodon), four-horned giraffes (Sivatherium, Giraffokeryx), giant tortoises (Geochelone), sabre-toothed cats (Paramachairodus), camels (Camelus), and other species found on the surface of the Siwalik Hills. Moreover, thousands of ancient bronze javelins and spears are also found there after rains. These archaeological artefacts, along with the paleontological remains, appear to have influenced the setting and context of the great battle in the Indian epic.

Download full-text


Available from: Alexandra Anna van der Geer,
  • Source
    • "The use of fossils for traditional remedies is an underexplored aspect of ethnopharmacology. Fossils are found in the myths and narratives of many different cultures and are used for traditional medicinal practices around the world [7] [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There have been very few ethnopharmacological studies performed on the traditional use of fossil species, although a few records have been conducted in Asia, Africa, and Europe. This study is the first ever to be performed on the use of Testudine (turtle) fossils for folk medicine in Latin America. An investigation was conducted in the Araripe Basin, which is one of the most important fossil-bearing reserves in the world due to the diversity, endemism, and quality of preservation of its fossils. We propose the formalization of a new discipline called ethnopaleontology, which will involve the study of the dynamic relationship between humans and fossils, from human perception to direct use.
    Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 01/2012; 2012(1741-427X):691717. DOI:10.1155/2012/691717 · 1.88 Impact Factor

  • Myth & Symbol 11/2009; 5(2):58-74. DOI:10.1080/10223820902723254
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the first decades of the twentieth century, the fragmentary remains of a huge prehistoric ungulate were unearthed in scientific expeditions in India, Turkestan and Mongolia. Following channels of formal and informal empire, these were transported to collections in Britain, Russia and the United States. While striking and of immense size, the bones proved extremely difficult to interpret. Alternately naming the creature Paraceratherium, Baluchitherium and Indricotherium, paleontologists Clive Forster-Cooper, Alexei Borissiak and Henry Fairfield Osborn struggled over the reconstruction of this gigantic fossil mammal. However, despite these problems, shared work on the creature served as a focus for collaboration and exchange rather than rivalry between these three scientific communities. Not only did the initial interpretation and analysis depend on pre-existing connections between British and American paleontological institutions, but the need for comparative material, recognition and contacts brought British and American scholars into communication and exchange with their counterparts in the Soviet Union. This article examines these processes. It first uses these excavations as a comparative case-study of different manifestations of colonial science in this period, examining how scholars in the Britain, the Russian Empire and the United States used formal and informal colonial links to Asia to pursue new research. It then moves to examine how the common problem of reconstructing this giant animal drew metropolitan scientific communities together, at least for a time. The construction of the Baluchitherium and Indricotherium illustrates the drives to expand research both imperially and internationally in the early-twentieth century, but also the continual problems in resources, institutionalization, transport and communication that could run up against scientific work.
    Journal of the History of Biology 12/2014; 48(2). DOI:10.1007/s10739-014-9395-y · 0.45 Impact Factor