Can treatment with Cocculine improve the control of chemotherapy-induced emesis in early breast cancer patients? A randomized, multi-centered, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial.

BMC Cancer (Impact Factor: 3.32). 12/2012; 12(1):603. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-603
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains a major problem that seriously impairs the quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy regimens. Complementary medicines, including homeopathy, are used by many patients with cancer, usually alongside with conventional treatment. A randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a complex homeopathic medicine, Cocculine, in the control of CINV in non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated by standard chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with non-metastatic breast cancer scheduled to receive 6 cycles of chemotherapy including at least three initial cycles of FAC 50, FEC 100 or TAC were randomized to receive standard anti-emetic treatment plus either a complex homeopathic remedy (Cocculine, registered in France for treatment of nausea and travel sickness) or the matching placebo (NCT00409071 The primary endpoint was nausea score measured after the 1st chemotherapy course using the FLIE questionnaire (Functional Living Index for Emesis) with 5-day recall. Secondary endpoints were: vomiting measured by the FLIE score, nausea and vomiting measured by patient self-evaluation (EVA) and investigator recording (NCI-CTC AE V3.0) and treatment compliance. RESULTS: From September 2005 to January 2008, 431 patients were randomized: 214 to Cocculine (C) and 217 to placebo (P). Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 arms. Overall, compliance to study treatments was excellent and similar between the 2 arms. A total of 205 patients (50.9%; 103 patients in the placebo and 102 in the homeopathy arms) had nausea FLIE scores > 6 indicative of no impact of nausea on quality of life during the 1st chemotherapy course. There was no difference between the 2 arms when primary endpoint analysis was performed by chemotherapy stratum; or in the subgroup of patients with susceptibility to nausea and vomiting before inclusion. In addition, nausea, vomiting and global emesis FLIE scores were not statistically different at any time between the two study arms. The frequencies of severe (Grade >= 2) nausea and vomiting were low in our study (nausea: P: 17.6% vs C: 15.7%, p=0.62; vomiting: P: 10.8% vs C: 12.0%, p=0.72 during the first course). CONCLUSION: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised Phase III study showed that adding a complex homeopathic medicine (Cocculine) to standard anti-emetic prophylaxis does not improve the control of CINV in early breast cancer patients.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Development of effective antiemetic therapy depends upon an understanding of both the antiemetic agents and the emetogenic challenges these agents are designed to address. New potential antiemetic agents should be studied in an orderly manner, proceeding from phase I to phase II open-label trials and then to randomized double-blind phase III trials comparing new agents and regimens to best standard therapy. Use of placebos in place of antiemetic therapy against highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy is unacceptable. Nausea and vomiting should be evaluated separately and for both the acute and delayed periods. Defining the emetogenicity of new antineoplastic agents is a challenge, since such data are often not reliably recorded during early drug development. A four-level classification system is proposed for emetogenicity of intravenous antineoplastic agents. A separate four-level classification system for emetogenicity of oral antineoplastic agents, which are often given over an extended period of time, is also proposed.
    Supportive Care Cancer 03/2005; 13(2):80-4. DOI:10.1007/s00520-004-0718-y · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE), a patient-reported outcome measure, was originally developed to assess the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) on patients' daily lives over the 3 days following chemotherapy. More recent studies of CINV include assessments covering the 5 days following chemotherapy in an effort to capture information during both the acute (within 24 h) and delayed (up to 5-7 days) phases of CINV. To assess the measurement characteristics of a modified version of the FLIE with 5-day recall. Instrument reliability, validity, and missing data were assessed. Data were collected from 183 patients receiving cisplatin >or=70 mg/m(2) as part of a phase IIb antiemetic trial of an NK-1 receptor antagonist (MK-0869). Patients recorded the number of vomiting episodes and nausea ratings in a 5-day daily diary. The 5-day FLIE had: (1) excellent internal consistency within FLIE Nausea and Vomiting domains (Cronbach's alpha 0.77-0.78), (2) acceptable construct validity shown by FLIE item-total correlations stronger within domains ( r=0.74-0.97) than across domains ( r=0.52-0.76), and (3) acceptable convergent validity as shown by moderate to strong correlations between FLIE domain scores and independent endpoints of emetic episodes, nausea ratings, and use of rescue medications. The extent of missing data was within acceptable limits with less than 2% of patients missing data. The 5-day FLIE had adequate measurement characteristics for studying the impact of CINV on patients' daily lives during the period covering both the acute and delayed phases.
    Supportive Care Cancer 09/2003; 11(8):522-7. DOI:10.1007/s00520-003-0482-4 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Healthcare providers believe they have a positive impact on controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), yet patients still consider CINV to be one of the most distressing side effects of chemotherapy. The effect of CINV on daily activities has been measured using the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) scale, a validated, nausea- and vomiting-specific, patient-reported outcome instrument comprising nine items in each of two domains. This research explores the potential correlation between reducing CINV and improved quality of life. In clinical trials, patients completed the FLIE questionnaires 24 and 96 hours after receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and antiemetic therapy using a serotonin receptor antagonist (ondansetron, dolasetron, or palonosetron). Significantly more patients given palonosetron had FLIE scores that reflected lessened impact of nausea on daily life during the acute period (0-24 hours) and of nausea/vomiting during both the acute and delayed periods (days 2-4). These findings strongly suggest that better antiemetic prevention allows patients to maintain their functional status for up to 5 days after chemotherapy.
    The journal of supportive oncology 02/2006; 4(1):35-41, 52.

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Aug 20, 2014