Article

Biomechanic evaluation of upper-extremity symmetry during manual wheelchair propulsion over varied terrain.

College of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.18). 11/2008; 89(10):1996-2002. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.03.020
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate upper-extremity symmetry during wheelchair propulsion across multiple terrain surfaces.
Case series.
A biomechanics laboratory and the general community.
Manual wheelchair users (N=12).
Not applicable.
Symmetry indexes for the propulsion moment, total force, tangential force, fractional effective force, time-to-peak propulsion moment, work, length of push cycle, and power during wheelchair propulsion over outdoor and indoor community conditions, and in laboratory conditions.
Upper-extremity asymmetry was present within each condition. There were no differences in the magnitude of asymmetry when comparing laboratory with indoor community conditions. Outdoor community wheelchair propulsion asymmetry was significantly greater than asymmetry measured during laboratory conditions.
Investigators should be aware that manual wheelchair propulsion is an asymmetrical act, which may influence interpretation when data is collected from a single limb or averaged for both limbs. The greater asymmetry identified during outdoor versus laboratory conditions emphasizes the need to evaluate wheelchair biomechanics in the user's natural environment.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
126 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Handrim wheelchair propulsion is a complex bimanual motor task. The bimanually applied forces on the rims determine the speed and direction of locomotion. Measurements of forces and torques on the handrim are important to study status and change of propulsion technique (and consequently mechanical strain) due to processes of learning, training or the wheelchair configuration. The purpose of this study was to compare the simultaneous outcomes of two different measurement-wheels attached to the different sides of the wheelchair, to determine measurement consistency within and between these wheels given the expected inter- and intra-limb variability as a consequence of motor control. METHODS: Nine able-bodied subjects received a three-week low-intensity handrim wheelchair practice intervention. They then performed three four-minute trials of wheelchair propulsion in an instrumented hand rim wheelchair on a motor-driven treadmill at a fixed belt speed. The two measurement-wheels on each side of the wheelchair measured forces and torques of one of the two upper limbs, which simultaneously perform the push action over time. The resulting data were compared as direct output using cross-correlation on the torque around the wheel-axle. Calculated push characteristics such as power production and speed were compared using an intra-class correlation. RESULTS: Measured torque around the wheel axle of the two measurement-wheels had a high average cross-correlation of 0.98 (std=0.01). Unilateral mean power output over a minute was found to have an intra-class correlation of 0.89 between the wheels. Although the difference over the pushes between left and right power output had a high variability, the mean difference between the measurement-wheels was low at 0.03 W (std=1.60). Other push characteristics showed even higher ICC's (>0.9). CONCLUSIONS: A good agreement between both measurement-wheels was found at the level of the power output. This indicates a high comparability of the measurement-wheels for the different propulsion parameters. Data from both wheels seem suitable to be used together or interchangeably in experiments on motor control and wheelchair propulsion performance. A high variability in forces and timing between the left and right side were found during the execution of this bimanual task , reflecting the human motor control process.
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 01/2013; 10(1):9. · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study design:Repeated cross-sectional study.Objectives:To compare the effects of rolling resistances (RRs) on handrim kinetic intensity at the non-dominant upper limb and on handrim kinetic symmetry during wheelies performed by manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Pathokinesiology Laboratory.Methods:Sixteen individuals with SCI who were able to perform wheelies participated in this study. During a laboratory assessment, participants randomly performed wheelies on four RRs: natural high-grade composite board, 5-cm thick soft foam, 5-cm thick memory foam, and with the rear wheels blocked by wooden blocks. Four trials were conducted for each of the RRs. Participant's wheelchair was equipped with instrumented wheels to record handrim kinetics, whereas the movements of the wheelchair were recorded with a motion analysis system.Results:The net mean and peak total forces, including its tangential and mediolateral components, were greater during take-off compared with the other phases of the wheelie, independently of RR. During take-off, the greatest net mean and peak total and tangential forces were reached with the wheels blocked. Symmetrical tangential and mediolateral force intensities were applied at the dominant and non-dominant handrims.Conclusion:Wheelies performed on low or moderate density foam generate similar forces at the handrim than on a natural surface and significantly less forces than with the wheels blocked. Hence, when teaching individuals with an SCI to perform a stationary wheelie, the use of low or moderate density foam represents a valuable alternative for minimizing upper limb effort and may also optimize quasi-static postural steadiness.Spinal Cord advance online publication, 27 November 2012; doi:10.1038/sc.2012.140.
    Spinal Cord 01/2013; 51:245-251. · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current methods for evaluating upper extremity (UE) dynamics during pediatric wheelchair use are limited. We propose a new model to characterize UE joint kinematics and kinetics during pediatric wheelchair mobility. The bilateral model is comprised of the thorax, clavicle, scapula, upper arm, forearm, and hand segments. The modeled joints include: sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, glenohumeral, elbow and wrist. The model is complete and is currently undergoing pilot studies for clinical application. Results may provide considerable quantitative insight into pediatric UE joint dynamics to improve wheelchair prescription, training and long term care of children with orthopaedic disabilities.
    Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference 08/2012; 2012:4788-91.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
1 Download
Available from
Jul 21, 2014