Article

Biomechanical Evaluation of Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: Do Anchors Really Matter?

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.7). 12/2012; DOI: 10.1177/0363546512469092
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND:Suture anchor fixation has become the preferred method for arthroscopic repairs of rotator cuff tears. Recently, newer arthroscopic repair techniques including transosseous-equivalent repairs with anchors or arthroscopic transosseous suture passage have been developed. PURPOSE:To compare the initial biomechanical performance including ultimate load to failure and localized cyclic elongation between transosseous-equivalent repair with anchors (TOE), traditional transosseous repair with a curved bone tunnel (TO), and an arthroscopic transosseous repair technique utilizing a simple (AT) or X-box suture configuration (ATX). STUDY DESIGN:Controlled laboratory study. METHODS:Twenty-eight human cadaveric shoulders were dissected to create an isolated supraspinatus tear and randomized into 1 of 4 repair groups (TOE, TO, AT, ATX). Tensile testing was conducted to simulate the anatomic position of the supraspinatus with the arm in 60° of abduction and involved an initial preload, cyclic loading, and pull to failure. Localized elongation during testing was measured using optical tracking. Data were statistically assessed using analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons. RESULTS:The TOE repair demonstrated a significantly higher mean ± SD failure load (558.4 ± 122.9 N) compared with the TO (325.3 ± 79.9 N), AT (291.7 ± 57.9 N), and ATX (388.5 ± 92.6 N) repairs (P < .05). There was also a significantly larger amount of first-cycle excursion in the AT group (8.19 ± 1.85 mm) compared with the TOE group (5.10 ± 0.89 mm). There was no significant difference between repair groups in stiffness during maximum load to failure or in normalized cyclic elongation. Failure modes were as follows: TOE, tendon (n = 4) and bone (n = 3); TO, suture (n = 6) and bone (n = 1); AT, tendon (n = 2) and bone (n = 3) and suture (n = 1); ATX, tendon (n = 7). CONCLUSION:This study demonstrates that anchorless repair techniques using transosseous sutures result in significantly lower failure loads than a repair model utilizing anchors in a TOE construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:Suture anchor repair appears to offer superior biomechanical properties to transosseous repairs regardless of tunnel or suture configuration.

1 Bookmark
 · 
114 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The transosseous approach has been well known for a long time as a valid repair approach. Over time various criticisms have been raised over this technique principally classifiable in two main categories: technical difficulty and related reproducibility in an arthroscopic environment, and repair stability (in the suture-bone contact area). About cyclic performance several authors have conceived tests set up with the aim of simulating a real environment in dynamic load conditions. The aim of this study is to monitor gap formation in a cyclic test set up. Methods The performance (measured as gap formation) has been monitored as a function of bone density to verify the effect of the latter. The test blocks have been shaped by sawbones® test bricks (Malmo, Sweden) of different densities and the following values have been tested: 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 pcf. Findings The comparison has been made between the two groups, traditional transosseous and new approach with an interposed device. Regarding the traditional transosseous approach in a 10 pcf environment not even the first loading cycle was completed, the whole bone bridge was destroyed in the first loading ramp and no further loading capability was present in the repair. By increasing the block density the surface damage in the suture-block contact decreased. Interpretation With this work it has been demonstrated how the traditional transosseous approach is strongly influenced by the bone quality up to the point where, in certain conditions, a safe and reliable repair is not guaranteed.
    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 04/2014; 29(4). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.01.008 · 1.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rotator cuff disease is common and may be clinically silent or a cause of shoulder pain. Evaluation of the rotator cuff before and after surgery is challenging for the orthopedic surgeon, but the radiologist can make an accurate diagnosis and facilitate appropriate management. This article reviews the current concepts on imaging diagnosis of rotator cuff disease, beginning with a discussion of the complex anatomy of the rotator cuff, continuing into the normal and pathologic MR imaging appearances of the rotator cuff including tendinosis and tearing, and concluding with a review of the postoperative cuff after various surgical repair techniques.
    Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology 09/2014; 18(4):412-24. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1384830 · 0.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An ideal rotator cuff repair maximizes the tendon-bone interface and has adequate biomechanical strength that can withstand a high level of demand. Arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repairs have become popular and have been shown to be superior to many other methods of fixation. We present an alternative method of repair for large crescent rotator cuff tears that combines 2 well-known methods of fixation: modified SpeedBridge (Arthrex, Naples, FL) and double-pulley techniques. These 2 repair constructs were combined to provide the greatest amount of compression across the footprint while also providing rigid fixation. Ultimately, this can provide an optimal environment for healing in otherwise significant injuries.
    06/2014; 3(3). DOI:10.1016/j.eats.2014.04.001