Article

Epidemiology of Ornithodoros brasiliensis (mouro tick) in the southern Brazilian highlands and the description of human and animal retrospective cases of tick parasitism

Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor (IPVDF), Fundação Estadual de Pesquisa Agropecuária (FEPAGRO), Eldorado do Sul, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: .
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases (Impact Factor: 2.88). 12/2012; 4(1-2). DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.09.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ornithodoros brasiliensis, also known as the "mouro" tick, is an argasid tick found exclusively in the southern Brazilian highlands. O. brasiliensis parasitism is frequently associated with severe symptoms directly induced by the tick bite, a condition compatible with the definition of tick toxicosis. The objectives of this work include (i) the determination of the distribution of O. brasiliensis in farms located in the tick-endemic region, (ii) the description of the characteristics of O. brasiliensis habitats, (iii) the analysis of risk factors associated with O. brasiliensis, and (iv) the retrospective description of cases of human and animal parasitism by O. brasiliensis. Of the 30 farms included in this study, O. brasiliensis was identified on 5 farms (frequency 16.7%), in which several ticks found in high density buried in soil were collected. Information regarding the tick habitats and the local population was recorded. The data indicated that O. brasiliensis feeds on humans, dogs, armadillos (Dasypus hybridus), and possibly skunks (Conepatus chinga). The analysis of risk factors indicated that the presence of house basements with an unpaved (natural soil) floor on farms and insufficient sanitary conditions significantly enhanced the probability of identifying O. brasiliensis. Additionally, we describe retrospectively cases of tick parasitism in 28 humans and 11 dogs including the most common symptoms associated with tick toxicosis. This is the first study concerning O. brasiliensis epidemiology, distribution, and habitat, and the report represents the most comprehensive characterization of Ornithodoros bite-associated toxicosis syndrome.

1 Follower
 · 
85 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction As an ecological adaptation venoms have evolved independently in several species of Metazoa. As haematophagous arthropods ticks are mainly considered as ectoparasites due to directly feeding on the skin of animal hosts. Ticks are of major importance since they serve as vectors for several diseases affecting humans and livestock animals. Ticks are rarely considered as venomous animals despite that tick saliva contains several protein families present in venomous taxa and that many Ixodida genera can induce paralysis and other types of toxicoses. Tick saliva was previously proposed as a special kind of venom since tick venom is used for blood feeding that counteracts host defense mechanisms. As a result, the present study provides evidence to reconsider the venomous properties of tick saliva. Results Based on our extensive literature mining and in silico research, we demonstrate that ticks share several similarities with other venomous taxa. Many tick salivary protein families and their previously described functions are homologous to proteins found in scorpion, spider, snake, platypus and bee venoms. This infers that there is a structural and functional convergence between several molecular components in tick saliva and the venoms from other recognized venomous taxa. We also highlight the fact that the immune response against tick saliva and venoms (from recognized venomous taxa) are both dominated by an allergic immunity background. Furthermore, by comparing the major molecular components of human saliva, as an example of a non-venomous animal, with that of ticks we find evidence that ticks resemble more venomous than non-venomous animals. Finally, we introduce our considerations regarding the evolution of venoms in Arachnida. Conclusions Taking into account the composition of tick saliva, the venomous functions that ticks have while interacting with their hosts, and the distinguishable differences between human (non-venomous) and tick salivary proteins, we consider that ticks should be referred to as venomous ectoparasites.
    Frontiers in Zoology 07/2014; 11. DOI:10.1186/1742-9994-11-47 · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The abundance and activity of ectoparasites and its hosts are affected by various abiotic factors, such as climate and other organisms (predators, pathogens and competitors) presenting thus multiples forms of association (obligate to facultative, permanent to intermittent and superficial to subcutaneous) developed during long co-evolving processes. Ticks are ectoparasites widespread globally and its eco epidemiology are closely related to the environmental conditions. They are obligatory hematophagous ectoparasites and responsible as vectors or reservoirs at the transmission of pathogenic fungi, protozoa, viruses, rickettsia and others bacteria during their feeding process on the hosts. Ticks constitute the second vector group that transmit the major number of pathogens to humans and play a role primary for animals in the process of diseases transmission. Many studies on bioecology of ticks, considering the information related to their population dynamics, to the host and the environment, comes possible the application and efficiency of tick control measures in the prevention programs of vector-borne diseases. In this review were considered some taxonomic, morphological, epidemiological and clinical fundamental aspects related to the tick-borne infections that affect human and animal populations. How to cite this article: Brites-Neto J, Duarte KMR, Martins TF (2015) Tick-borne infections in human and animal population worldwide, Veterinary World 8(3):301-315.
    Veterinary World 03/2015; 8(3):301-315. DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2015.301-315
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ornithodoros brasiliensis, also known as the mouro tick, is an argasid tick only found in the highlands of Southern Brazil. O. brasiliensis parasitism is associated with severe reactions in its hosts ranging from local pruritus and pain to systemic disturbances. Recently, the re-emergence of O. brasiliensis parasitism in humans and dogs drew attention to the clinical findings induced by its bite, which are poorly understood and described. Moreover, rare experimental data about tick bite effects under controlled conditions were available. Thus, this study aimed to describe clinical and pathological findings induced by O. brasiliensis bites in experimentally parasitized rats. Ticks feed for ∼40 minutes in rats, and their weight increased by approximately four times after the blood meal. Rats bitten by five adult ticks showed hyperemia of the oral/ocular mucosa, piloerection, tachypnea, claudication, ocular and nasal discharge, pruritus, and swollen and erythemic lesions. A large hemorrhagic lesion was observed on rat skin in tick attachment sites, reaching ∼17 mm in diameter 12 hours after a bite. Bitten rats also presented an increased bleeding tendency (∼50%) 6 hours after a tick bite, evaluated by the tail-cut rat model of bleeding. Blood samples of bitten rats were taken, and clinical pathology analysis showed significant alterations in the eosinophil and basophil counts, in creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and CPK MB fraction, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, and fibrinogen level. Histopathological analysis revealed marked subcutaneous hemorrhage, edema and slight muscle degeneration at the bite site. Also, muscle degeneration and necrosis were observed in the myocardium of bitten rats 72 hours after bites by histopathology and immunohistochemistry against troponin C. This work showed the ability of O. brasiliensis to cause severe disturbances in experimentally parasitized rats, compatible with a tick toxicosis syndrome. This observation associated with the re-emergence of O. brasiliensis parasitism makes this parasite as a public health hazard in southern Brazil.
    Toxicon 06/2014; 88. DOI:10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.06.017 · 2.58 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
48 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014