Efficacy of an Ibuprofen/Codeine Combination for Pain Management in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department with a Limb Injury: A Pilot Study.

Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Journal of Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.18). 12/2012; 44(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.06.027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Fractures and severe sprains generate moderate to severe pain (>3/10). Despite this fact, pain management in children presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a musculoskeletal trauma is still suboptimal. Few studies have focused on the efficacy of a combination of an opioid with an anti-inflammatory drug to relieve this type of pain. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a combination of codeine with ibuprofen to ibuprofen alone on the intensity of pain experienced by children presenting to the ED with a musculoskeletal trauma to a limb. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included patients aged 6 to 18 years. After triage, subjects were randomized to either ibuprofen (10 mg/kg, max 600 mg) and codeine (1 mg/kg, max 60 mg) orally, or ibuprofen (10 mg/kg, max 600 mg) and a placebo orally. Pain was assessed with the visual analog scale (0 to 10) at triage, and at 60, 90, and 120 min after medication administration. Differences on mean pain scores were compared between groups over time. RESULTS: We recruited 81 patients, 40 in the experimental group and 41 in the control group. No significant differences were observed in mean pain scores between groups at any time point. Mean pain scores were moderate at 90 min in both experimental and control groups (4.0 ± 2.4 vs. 4.1 ± 2.0, respectively). Side effects were minimal. CONCLUSION: The addition of codeine to ibuprofen did not significantly improve pain management in children with musculoskeletal trauma to a limb. Pain control provided by the medications remained suboptimal for most patients.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the frequency of emergency department analgesic use in children with presumably painful fractures who are also at risk for associated multiple injuries and to determine whether there are specific factors that distinguish those who are prescribed analgesics from those who are not. Descriptive, retrospective review of a computerized trauma registry. Regional pediatric ED and trauma center. Four hundred thirty-three injured children met trauma team activation criteria from January 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992. Of these 433, we selected the 121 children who had fractures of the pelvis, long bones, ankle, wrist, or clavicle. Of these 121, we excluded the 22 children who underwent endotracheal intubation. Trauma registry data from the prehospital and ED phases of care from the remaining 99 children were reviewed for this study. None. Of the study group, 53% (52 of 99) received analgesics, all narcotics. Excluding the 46 children with multi-system injuries, only 62% (33 of 53) received analgesics. Patients in both the analgesic (52) and no-analgesic groups (47) were mildly to moderately injured based on initial ED trauma scores and vital signs. No statistical or clinical significant differences were found between the analgesic group and the no-analgesic group when comparing age, sex, race, mechanism of injury, vehicle speed, height of fall, time elapsed from injury until arrival at the ED, transport method, prehospital analgesic use, mortality, Injury Severity Score, and initial ED vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale, Trauma Score, and Pediatric Trauma Score. Fifty-nine percent (ten of 17) of the children with associated internal injuries limited to the chest or abdomen received analgesics compared with 62% (33 of 53) in those with isolated fracture (P = .8). Those with an associated head injury (31%, nine of 29) received analgesics less frequently than those with isolated fracture (62%, 33 of 53) (P = .01). Our results suggest that ED analgesic use was low in these mildly to moderately injured children with presumably painful fractures who are also at risk for associated multiple injuries. Head injury was associated with especially low analgesic use. We did not identify other specific factors that distinguished those who received analgesics from those who did not. Further investigation is required to determine if after the initial evaluation, a larger proportion of mildly to moderately injured trauma victims with fractures are appropriate candidates for ED analgesic use.
    Annals of Emergency Medicine 03/1994; 23(2):203-7. DOI:10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70031-1 · 4.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We analyze records of all emergency department (ED) patients with extremity or clavicular fractures to describe analgesic use, compare analgesia between adults and children, and compare analgesia between the subset of these adults and children with documented moderate or severe pain. Among children, we compare treatment between pediatric and nonpediatric facilities. Analysis of the ED component of the National Center for Health Statistics National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 1997 through 2000 was conducted. The proportion of patients with closed extremity and clavicular fracture that received any analgesic and narcotic analgesic medications was determined for each age category. Survey-adjusted regression analyses compared pain and narcotic medications by age and ED type (pediatric versus other). Analyses were repeated for the subset of patients with moderate or severe pain severity scores. Of 2,828 patients with isolated closed fractures of the extremities or clavicle, 64% received any analgesic and 42% received a narcotic analgesic. Pain severity scores were recorded for 59% of visits overall, 47% of children younger than 4 years, and 34% of children younger than 1 year. Among patients with documented moderate or severe pain, 73% received an analgesic and 54% received a narcotic analgesic. Compared with adults, a lower proportion of children (< or = 15 years) received either any analgesic or a narcotic analgesic (P <.001). After adjustment for confounders and survey design, the proportion of patients aged 0 to 3, 4 to 8, 9 to 15, 16 to 29, 30 to 69, and 70 years and older who received any analgesic was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41% to 67%), 63% (95% CI 57% to 68%), 60% (95% CI 57% to 64%), 67% (95% CI 62% to 73%), 68% (95% CI 64% to 72%), and 58% (95% CI 52% to 65%), respectively; the proportion who received a narcotic analgesic was 21% (95% CI 11% to 31%), 30% (95% CI 22% to 37%), 27% (95% CI 23% to 32%), 47% (95% CI 40% to 54%), 51% (95% CI 46% to 56%), and 41% (95% CI 35% to 48%), respectively. Compared with children treated in other EDs, children treated in pediatric EDs were about as likely to receive any analgesia (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.1; 95% CI 0.9 to 1.3) or narcotic analgesia (adjusted RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.2). In pediatric and adult patients, pain medications were frequently not part of ED treatment for fractures, even for visits with documented moderate or severe pain. Pain severity scores were often not recorded. Pediatric patients were least likely to receive analgesics, especially narcotics.
    Annals of Emergency Medicine 09/2003; 42(2):197-205. DOI:10.1067/mem.2003.275 · 4.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children's pain in emergency departments (EDs) is poorly managed by nurses, despite evidence that pain is one of the most commonly presenting complaints of children attending the ED. Our objectives were 2-fold: to verify if tailored educational interventions with emergency pediatric nurses would improve nurses' knowledge of pain management and nurses' pain management practices (documentation of pain, administration of analgesics, nonpharmacological interventions). This intervention study with a pre-post design (baseline, immediately after the intervention [T-2], and 6 months after intervention [T-3]) used a sample of nurses (N = 50) and retrospective chart reviews of children (N = 450; 150 charts reviewed each at baseline, T-2, and T-3) who presented themselves in the ED with a diagnosis known to generate moderate to severe pain (burns, acute abdominal pain, deep lacerations, fracture, sprain). Principal outcomes: nurses' knowledge of pain management (Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Survey [PNKAS] on pain) and nurses' clinical practices of pain management (Pain Management Experience Evaluation [PMEE]). Response rate on the PNKAS was 84% (42/50) at baseline and 50% (21/42) at T-2. Mean scores on PNKAS were 28.2 (SD, 4.9; max, 42.0) at baseline and 31.0 (SD, 4.6) at T-2. Results from paired t test showed significant difference between both times (t = -3.129, P = 0.005). Nurses who participated in the capsules improved their documentation of pain from baseline (59.3%) to T-2 (80.8%; chi = 12.993, P < 0.001) as well as from baseline (59.3%) to T-3 (89.1%; chi = 29.436, P < 0.001). In addition, nurses increased their nonpharmacological interventions from baseline (16.7%) to T-3 (31.9%; chi = 8.623, P = 0.003). Finally, we obtained significant differences on pain documentation between the group of nurses who attended at least 1 capsule and the group of nurses who did not attend any capsule at both times (T-2 and T-3; chi = 20.424, P < 0.001; chi = 33.333, P < 0.001, respectively). The interventions contributed to the improvement of the nurses' knowledge of pain management and some of the practices over time. We believe that an intervention tailored to nurses' needs and schedule has more impact than just passive diffusion of educational content.
    Pediatric emergency care 07/2009; 25(8):498-503. DOI:10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b0a0af · 0.92 Impact Factor