Proteomic approaches to the study of papillomavirus-host interactions.

Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, NRB Room 950, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: .
Virology (Impact Factor: 3.28). 01/2013; 435(1):57-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.046
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The identification of interactions between viral and host cellular proteins has provided major insights into papillomavirus research, and these interactions are especially relevant to the role of papillomaviruses in the cancers with which they are associated. Recent advances in mass spectrometry technology and data processing now allow the systematic identification of such interactions. This has led to an improved understanding of the different pathologies associated with the many papillomavirus types, and the diverse nature of these viruses is reflected in the spectrum of interactions with host proteins. Here we review a history of proteomic approaches, particularly as applied to the papillomaviruses, and summarize current techniques. Current proteomic studies on the papillomaviruses use yeast-two-hybrid or affinity purification-mass spectrometry approaches. We detail the advantages and disadvantages of each and describe current examples of papillomavirus proteomic studies, with a particular focus on the HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Viruses have developed numerous and elegant strategies to manipulate the host cell machinery in order to establish a productive infectious cycle. The interaction of viral proteins with host proteins plays an important role in infection and pathogenesis, often bypassing traditional host defenses such as the interferon response and apoptosis. Host-viral protein interactions can be studied using a variety of proteomic approaches ranging from genetic and biochemical to large-scale high-throughput technologies. Protein interactions between host and viral proteins are greatly influenced by host signal transduction pathways. In this review we will focus on comparing proteomic information obtained through differing technologies and how their integration can be used to determine the functional aspect of the host response to infection. We will briefly review and evaluate techniques employed to elucidate viral-host interactions with a primary focus on Protein Microarrays (PMA) and Mass Spectrometry (MS) as potential tools in the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. As many potential molecular markers and targets are proteins, proteomic profiling is expected to yield both clearer and more direct answers to functional and pharmacologic questions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Pathogens and disease. 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The DNA of equine papillomavirus type 2 (EcPV2) is consistently found in equine papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas, indicating a causal association of EcPV2 in the pathogenesis of these tumours; however, little is known about the prevalence of this virus.
    Veterinary Dermatology 06/2014; 25(3). · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Avian poxvirus (Avipox) is widely reported from avian species causing, cutaneous or mucosal lesions. Mortality rates of up to 100% are recorded in some hosts. Three major Avipox clades are recognized. Several diagnostic techniques have been reported, with molecular techniques only used recently. Avipox has been reported from 278 different avian species, but only 111 of these involved sequence and/or strain identification. Collecting samples from wild birds is challenging as only few wild bird individuals or species may be symptomatic. Also sampling regimes are tightly regulated and the most efficient sampling method, whole bird collection, is ethically challenging. In this study, three alternative sampling techniques (blood, cutaneous swabs and tissue biopsies) from symptomatic wild birds were examined. PCR was used to detect Avipox virus and avian papillomavirus (which also induces cutaneous lesions in birds). Four out of 14 tissue samples were positive but all 29 blood and 22 swab samples were negative for papillomavirus. All 29 blood samples were negative but 6/22 swabs and 9/14 tissue samples were Avipox positive. The difference between the numbers of positives generated from tissue samples and from swabs was not significant. The difference in the Avipox positive specimens in paired swab (4/6) and tissue samples (6/6) was also not significant. Therefore these results do not show the superiority of swab or tissue samples over each other. However, both swab (6/22) and tissue (8/9) samples yielded significantly more Avipox positives than blood samples, which are therefore not recommended for sampling these viruses.
    Avian Pathology 01/2014; · 2.04 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 6, 2014