Article

Are the effects of a non-drug multimodal activation therapy of dementia sustainable? follow-up study 10 months after completion of a randomised controlled trial.

BMC Neurology (Impact Factor: 2.49). 12/2012; 12(1):151. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-151
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term success of non-drug therapies for treating dementia, especially whether the effects are sustained after therapy ends. Here, we examined the effects of a one-year multimodal therapy 10 months after patients completed the therapy. METHODS: This randomised, controlled, single-blind, longitudinal trial involved 61 patients (catamnesis: n = 52) with primary degenerative dementia in five nursing homes in Bavaria, Germany. The highly standardised intervention, MAKS, consisted of motor stimulation, practice of activities of daily living (ADLs), and cognitive stimulation. Each group of 10 patients was treated for 2 h, 6 days a week for 12 months. Control patients received standard nursing home care. At baseline, at the end of therapy (month 12), and 10 months thereafter (month 22), cognitive functioning was assessed using the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, and the ability to perform ADLs was assessed using the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living. RESULTS: During the therapy phase, the MAKS patients maintained their cognitive function and ability to carry out ADLs. After the end of therapy, both the control and the MAKS groups deteriorated in both their cognitive function (control, p = 0.02; MAKS, p < 0.001) and their ability to carry out ADLs (control, p < 0.001; MAKS, p = 0.001). However, in a confound-adjusted multiple regression model, the ability of the MAKS group to perform ADLs remained significantly higher than that of the control group even 10 months after the end of therapy (H0: betaMAKS + betaMAKS month 22 = 0; chi2 = 3.8568, p = 0.0496). Cohen's d for the difference between the two groups in ADLs and cognitive abilities 10 months after the end of therapy was 0.40 and 0.22, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal non-drug therapy of dementia resulted in stabilisation of the ability to perform ADLs, even beyond the end of therapy. To prevent functional decline for as long as possible, therapy should be performed continuously until the benefit for the patient ends. Follow-up studies on larger numbers of patients are needed to definitively confirm these results.Trial registrationhttp://www.isrctn.com Identifier: ISRCTN87391496.

1 Bookmark
 · 
64 Views
  • Source
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 01/2014; 6:212. · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is much interest in early intervention for the prevention or postponement of dementia in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The results of drugs trials in this regard have thus far been disappointing, and non-pharmacological interventions are receiving increased attention. One such intervention is complex cognitive activity. Evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that participation in stimulating mental activities is associated with lowered dementia risk. The introduction of novel and complex cognitive interventions to healthy adults and those with cognitive impairment may represent an efficacious treatment option to improve cognition, lower dementia incidence, and slow rate of decline. This review examines the evidence for restorative cognitive training (CT) and addresses a number of clinically relevant issues regarding cognitive benefit and its transfer and persistence. Although the number of randomized controlled trials is limited, preliminary evidence suggests that CT may provide immediate and longer term cognitive benefits which generalize to non-trained domains and non-cognitive functions, with supervised small group multi-domain training providing greatest benefits. Possible neuroplastic mechanisms are discussed, and recommendations for further research and clinical implementation provided.
    Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD 08/2014; 42(Suppl 4):S551-S559. · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unawareness of deficit has been shown to affect the outcome of targeted cognitive intervention programmes applied to patients with Alzheimer' disease (AD), but the effects on multimodal therapeutic approaches have not yet been explored. This research investigated the efficacy of the Multi-Intervention Programme (MIP) approach on improving cognitive, functional, affective, and behavioural symptoms in people with mild AD. In addition, we examined whether the presence of unawareness influences the MIP outcomes. Sixty-one mild stage AD patients were randomly assigned to either an experimental group which carried out an MIP individually (48 sessions, 16 weeks duration), combining diverse cognitive tasks, training in daily life and recreational activities, or a waiting list group which did not receive any treatment for the same time period. The efficacy of MIP (vs. waiting list) was tested using various standardised neuropsychological, functional, and behavioural outcome measures. Planned analyses were carried out to determine the effect of unawareness versus awareness on such outcomes. The results showed that patients overall benefited from the MIP in terms of both cognitive and non-cognitive symptoms. AD patients with awareness of deficits showed positive effects on all outcome measures in comparison with the waiting list group, while AD patients with unawareness showed improvements in non-cognitive symptoms only. In conclusion, the presence of unawareness reduces the cognitive and functional effects of MIP in patients with mild AD.
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 08/2014; · 2.07 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Download
15 Downloads
Available from
Mar 4, 2015
Available from