Article

Pérdida y fragmentación del bosque nativo en la cuenca del Río Aysén (Patagonia-Chile) durante el siglo XX

Revista de Geoografía Norte Grande 01/2011; 49:125-138. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-34022011000200008

ABSTRACT This work estimates the loss and fragmentation of native forest in the watershed of the river Aysén during the 20th century, as a result of clearance fires induced by land settlers. In order to generate the reconstruction of the native forest cover, several documentary records and GIS ArcView 3.2 were used. Different indexes of landscape changes were applied (area, density and size of the fragment, core area, euclidean distance, shape and aggregation index, and edge length) to estimate the distribution of the native forest between 1900 and 1998, which indicate that the main replacement of the forest was by prairies. A loss of approximately 23% of native forest was registered, also an increase in the number of forest fragments (<100 ha), as a result of the settlement process. Howerer, the increasing number of fragments has a high connectivity, wich was corroborated using different landscape indexes.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Fernando Torrejón, Aug 22, 2015

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Pérdida y fragmentación del bosque nativo en la cuenca del Río Aysén (Patagonia-Chile) durante el siglo XX

2.77 MB

See full-text
2 Followers
 · 
177 Views
  • Source
    • "The cattle industry has promoted the expansion of grassland in the lower and middle valley zones to the detriment of forests that have been limited to the upper slope positions. The environmental consequences of these forest fragmentation and land use changes in the region have been intensive soil erosion and loss of native species associated with original ecosystems (Ortega and Brüning 2004; Bizama et al. 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to develop a general model of aboveground net primary production (ANPP) of herbaceous communities in grazing systems that combine forested and open grasslands in temperate areas, biomass production and a set of biotic and abiotic variables were measured at four adjacent forest and grassland sites in Chile’s northern Patagonia for two consecutive growing seasons. At each site, one transect of 80 m long (40 m in open grassland and 40 m in forest) × 10 m wide was established. ANPP was significantly higher in open grasslands but no gradual change in biomass production was observed from inside the forest towards the open grassland. In open grasslands ANPP was spatially uniform but highly variable between years of contrasting weather conditions, whereas in forests it was more spatially heterogeneous and less variable over time. ANPP was highly correlated with cattle consumption. Structural equation models developed for the whole system confirm that ANPP was driven mainly by photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and available nitrogen. However, we found important differences between forests and the adjacent open grasslands. In forests ANPP was enhanced by positive feedbacks between the amount of transmitted PAR through the canopy and soil nutrient input via cattle dung deposition. In open grasslands nitrogen availability appeared to be the main limiting factor but also influenced by weather conditions (dryer or wetter years). The coexistence of forests and grasslands patches, with different susceptibility of ANPP to meteorological and soil nutrient availability, highlights the importance of implementing an integrated silvopastoral system with lenga (Nothofagus pumilio[Poepp. & Endl.] Krasser) in northern Patagonia.
    Agroforestry Systems 04/2014; 88(3):397-411. DOI:10.1007/s10457-014-9696-3 · 1.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patagonia is commonly seen as an exceptionally pristine area because of its wildlife and practically unpolluted waters. However, during the twentieth century the burning of natural forests was one of the most important human activities in Northern Chilean Patagonia. Some estimations indicate that three million hectares were burned during the first three decades of the century. Hence the objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of the historical fires in Lake Burgos (45º42′S) and Lake Thompson (45º38′S) in Chilean Patagonia. The impact was measured by evaluating chironomid assemblage since they are sensitive enough to be used as an indicator of aquatic ecosystem health. Fires have a direct and drastic effect on a lake watershed but also indirectly affect a lake ecosystem, changing sedimentation patterns or increasing nutrient inputs. In the studied lakes the periods with higher prevalence of fires were identified by charcoal analysis, while organic matter and magnetic susceptibility allowed the confirmation of pre-fire and post-fire periods. The chironomid composition was evaluated through a PCA and an analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) to test the significance among periods while a Detrended Correspondence Analysis was applied to the chironomid assemblage downcore to assess compositional structure and taxa turnover. In Lake Burgos the ANOSIM test indicated significant differences between the pre-fire and fire periods (p < 0.05), while in Lake Thompson differences were not significant. However, in Lake Thompson the PCA clearly separated the pre-fire from the fire period but not the fire from the post-fire periods. In both lakes chironomid composition changed in relation to the period of higher prevalence of fires, which in turn implies catchment changes, pollution, and other anthropogenic impacts. Particularly a marked change in mesotrophic/eutrophic taxa was detected, reflecting an increase in nutrient input due to deforestation. Our findings point out that the lacustrine ecosystems are still affected by the impact of fires and the subsequent increase in nutrient supply that occurred almost 50 years ago. No sign of reverting to pre-disturbance conditions was observed, which makes these lakes highly sensitive to current human-induced impacts.
    Journal of Paleolimnology 06/2013; 50(1). DOI:10.1007/s10933-013-9703-0 · 2.14 Impact Factor