The Influence of Obesity on the Outcome of Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation Analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)

Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, LEB, New Hampshire, United States
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.28). 11/2012; 95A(1). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01558
Source: PubMed


Questions remain as to the effect that obesity has on patients managed for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. The purpose of this study was to determine if obesity affects outcomes following the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.

An as-treated analysis was performed on patients enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A comparison was made between patients with a body mass index of <30 kg/m² (nonobese) (n = 854) and those with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m² (obese) (n = 336). Baseline patient demographic and clinical characteristics were documented. Primary and secondary outcomes were measured at baseline and at regular follow-up time intervals up to four years. The difference in improvement from baseline between operative and nonoperative treatment was determined at each follow-up period for both groups.

At the time of the four-year follow-up evaluation, improvements over baseline in primary outcome measures were significantly less for obese patients as compared with nonobese patients in both the operative treatment group (Short Form-36 physical function, 37.3 compared with 47.7 points [p < 0.001], Short Form-36 bodily pain, 44.2 compared with 50.0 points [p = 0.005], and Oswestry Disability Index, -33.7 compared with -40.1 points [p < 0.001]) and the nonoperative treatment group (Short Form-36 physical function, 23.1 compared with 32.0 points [p < 0.001] and Oswestry Disability Index, -21.4 compared with -26.1 points [p < 0.001]). The one exception was that the change from baseline in terms of the Short Form-36 bodily pain score was statistically similar for obese and nonobese patients in the nonoperative treatment group (30.9 compared with 33.4 points [p = 0.39]). At the time of the four-year follow-up evaluation, when compared with nonobese patients who had been managed operatively, obese patients who had been managed operatively had significantly less improvement in the Sciatica Bothersomeness Index and the Low Back Pain Bothersomeness Index, but had no significant difference in patient satisfaction or self-rated improvement. In the present study, 77.5% of obese patients and 86.9% of nonobese patients who had been managed operatively were working a full or part-time job. No significant differences were observed in the secondary outcome measures between obese and nonobese patients who had been managed nonoperatively. The benefit of surgery over nonoperative treatment was not affected by body mass index.

Obese patients realized less clinical benefit from both operative and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Surgery provided similar benefit over nonoperative treatment in obese and nonobese patients.

7 Reads
  • Source
    • "A previous study comparing perioperative findings between obese and nonobese patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery demonstrated no difference in operation time, EBL, or length of hospital day1). But, other study by Jeffrey et al. demonstrated that obesity leads to increased operation time, EBL, and length of hospital day8). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patients' bod mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes following one-level lumbar microdiscectomy. Methods From June 2003 to March 2007, 129 patients underwent one-level lumbar microdiscectomy performed at a single institution. We divided the patients into 3 groups, depending on BMI. A retrospective study was conducted among the 3 groups. The operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hospital day, recurrent disc herniation, intraoperative durotomy, and postoperative epidural steroid injection were analyzed. Regression models were used to predict the relationship between BMI and surgical outcomes including operation time and EBL. Results As BMI is greater, as the operation time is longer and the EBL is more. In particular, linear regression model analysis implied that 2.35 minute in the operation time is longer and 8.89cc in EBL is more, as BMI of 1 kg/m2 is increased. No statistically relevant differences were observed for postoperative hospital day, recurrent disc herniation, intraoperative durotomy, and postoperative epidural steroid injection. Conclusion The operation time and EBL was significantly increased in obesity, but there were no differences in surgical outcomes. Our results demonstrated that higher BMI are not likely to encounter heightened morbidity in lumbar microdiscectomy.
    06/2014; 11(2):68-73. DOI:10.14245/kjs.2014.11.2.68
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low back pain (LBP) is the world's most debilitating condition. Disk degeneration has been regarded as a strong determinant associated with LBP. Overweight and obesity are public health concerns that affect every population worldwide and whose prevalence continues to rise. Studies have indicated strong associations between overweight/obesity and disk degeneration as well as with LBP. This broad narrative review article addresses the various mechanisms that may be involved leading to disk degeneration and/or LBP in the setting of overweight/obesity. In particular, our goal is to raise awareness of the role of fat cells and their involvement via altered metabolism or the release of adipokines as well as other pathways that may lead to the development of disk degeneration and LBP. Understanding the role of fat in this process may aid in the development of novel biological therapies and technologies to halt the progression or regenerate the disk. Moreover, with genetic advancements and the appreciation of genetic epidemiology, a more personalized approach to spine care may have to consider the role of fat in any preventative, therapeutic, and/or prognosis modalities toward the disk and LBP.
    Global Spine Journal 06/2013; 3(3):133-144. DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1350054
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inconsistent results have been reported in the literature on the association between obesity, expressed as increased body mass index (BMI), and risk for surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery. The objective of this study was to review and quantify the association between increased BMI and risk of spinal SSI in adults. We performed a comprehensive search for relevant studies using PubMed, Embase, and references of published manuscripts. Study-specific risk measures were transformed into slope estimates and combined using the random effects meta-analysis model to establish the risk of SSI associated with every 5-unit increase in BMI. Thirty-four articles underwent full-text review. Variations were noted among these studies in relation to SSI diagnosis criteria and BMI cut-off levels used to define obesity. Data from 12 retrospective studies were included in the analyses. Results showed that BMI was significantly positively associated with the risk of spinal SSI. Unadjusted risk estimates demonstrated that a 5-unit increase in BMI was associated with 13 % increased risk of SSI [Crude odds ratio (OR): 1.13; 95 % CI: 1.07-1.19, p < 0.0001]. Pooling of risk estimates adjusted for diabetes and other confounders resulted in a 21 % increase in risk of spinal SSI for every 5-unit increase in BMI (adjusted OR: 1.21; 95 % CI 1.13-1.29, p < 0.0001). Higher BMI is associated with the increased risk of SSI following spine surgery. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this association and to determine whether other measures of fat distribution are better predictors of risk of SSI.
    European Spine Journal 07/2013; 22(12). DOI:10.1007/s00586-013-2890-6 · 2.07 Impact Factor
Show more