Article

Cell elongation is an adaptive response for clearing long chromatid arms from the cleavage plane.

Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064.
The Journal of Cell Biology (Impact Factor: 9.69). 11/2012; 199(5):745-53. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201208041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chromosome segregation must be coordinated with cell cleavage to ensure correct transmission of the genome to daughter cells. Here we identify a novel mechanism by which Drosophila melanogaster neuronal stem cells coordinate sister chromatid segregation with cleavage furrow ingression. Cells adapted to a dramatic increase in chromatid arm length by transiently elongating during anaphase/telophase. The degree of cell elongation correlated with the length of the trailing chromatid arms and was concomitant with a slight increase in spindle length and an enlargement of the zone of cortical myosin distribution. Rho guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (Pebble)-depleted cells failed to elongate during segregation of long chromatids. As a result, Pebble-depleted adult flies exhibited morphological defects likely caused by cell death during development. These studies reveal a novel pathway linking trailing chromatid arms and cortical myosin that ensures the clearance of chromatids from the cleavage plane at the appropriate time during cytokinesis, thus preserving genome integrity.

0 Followers
 · 
159 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pericentric heterochromatin, while often considered as "junk" DNA, plays important functions in chromosome biology. It contributes to sister chromatid cohesion, a process mediated by the cohesin complex that ensures proper genome segregation during nuclear division. Long stretches of heterochromatin are almost exclusively placed at centromere-proximal regions but it remains unclear if there is functional (or mechanistic) importance in linking the sites of sister chromatid cohesion to the chromosomal regions that mediate spindle attachment (the centromere). Using engineered chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster, we demonstrate that cohesin enrichment is dictated by the presence of heterochromatin rather than centromere proximity. This preferential accumulation is caused by an enrichment of the cohesin-loading factor (Nipped-B/NIPBL/Scc2) at dense heterochromatic regions. As a result, chromosome translocations containing ectopic pericentric heterochromatin embedded in euchromatin display additional cohesin-dependent constrictions. These ectopic cohesion sites, placed away from the centromere, disjoin abnormally during anaphase and chromosomes exhibit a significant increase in length during anaphase (termed chromatin stretching). These results provide evidence that long stretches of heterochromatin distant from the centromere, as often found in many cancers, are sufficient to induce abnormal accumulation of cohesin at these sites and thereby compromise the fidelity of chromosome segregation.
    PLoS Biology 10/2014; 12(10):e1001962. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001962 · 11.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Here we discuss a "chromosome separation checkpoint" that might regulate the anaphase-telophase transition. The concept of cell cycle checkpoints was originally proposed to account for extrinsic control mechanisms that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Several checkpoints have been shown to regulate major cell cycle transitions, namely at G1-S and G2-M. At the onset of mitosis, the prophase-prometaphase transition is controlled by several potential checkpoints, including the antephase checkpoint, while the spindle assembly checkpoint guards the metaphase-anaphase transition. Our hypothesis is based on the recently uncovered feedback control mechanism that delays chromosome decondensation and nuclear envelope reassembly until effective separation of sister chromatids during anaphase is achieved. A central player in this potential checkpoint is the establishment of a constitutive, midzone-based Aurora B phosphorylation gradient that monitors the position of chromosomes along the spindle axis. We propose that this surveillance mechanism represents an additional step towards ensuring mitotic fidelity. © 2014 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.
    BioEssays 12/2014; DOI:10.1002/bies.201400140 · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How organelle size is regulated is a fundamental question in cell biology. Cell sizes vary dramatically across different species and in different tissue types, and changes in cell size are especially dramatic during early development when cell division frequently occurs in the absence of cell growth. A largely unanswered question is how the sizes of organelles and subcellular structures are regulated relative to cell size, a phenomenon we refer to as scaling. In general, organelle size and/or number are proportionately greater in larger cells to accommodate increased metabolic or specific functional requirements of the cell. These correlations are not absolute and have not been investigated for some organelles, still the phenomenon of scaling provides a useful framework for understanding organelle size control. In this chapter, we review recent studies that have utilized different Xenopus systems to illuminate physiological mechanisms of organelle size regulation. The first half of the chapter discusses the characteristics of two related Xenopus species that exhibit size differences and describes how comparisons of in vitro egg extracts from these two species have contributed to our understanding of size regulation of the nucleus and mitotic spindle. In the second half of the chapter we focus on Xenopus developmental scaling when dramatic reductions in cell size occur and highlight how this system has informed size regulation of the nucleus, spindle, and mitotic chromosomes. We conclude with a discussion of the functional implications of organelle scaling and some future prospects about how these Xenopus systems might be used to elucidate size control of other organelles and subcellular structures.
    Xenopus Development, Edited by Malgorzata Kloc, Jacek Z. Kubiak, 03/2014: chapter 17: pages 325-345; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.., ISBN: 978-1-118-49281-9

Preview

Download
2 Downloads
Available from