Article

CT Colonography Pitfalls in Interpretation

Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA. Electronic address: .
Radiologic Clinics of North America (Impact Factor: 1.83). 01/2013; 51(1):69-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.09.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As with any radiologic imaging test, there are several potential interpretive pitfalls at CT colonography that need to be recognized and handled appropriately. Perhaps the single most important step in learning to avoid most of these diagnostic traps is simply to be aware of their existence. With a little experience, most of these potential pitfalls are easily recognized. This article systematically covers the key pitfalls confronting the radiologist at CT colonography interpretation, primarily dividing them into those related to technique and those related to underlying anatomy. Tips and pointers for how to effectively handle these potential pitfalls are included.

0 Followers
 · 
73 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To perform an objective, intra-individual comparison of residual colonic fluid volume and attenuation associated with the current front-line laxative magnesium citrate (MgC) versus the former front-line laxative sodium phosphate (NaP) at CT colonography (CTC).
    Clinical Radiology 09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2014.08.001 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this review is to provide an update on important recent advances in radiologic colorectal imaging, with emphasis on detection, staging, and surveillance of colorectal neoplasia.
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 11/2014; DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000141 · 3.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To objectively compare residual colonic fluid volume and attenuation of oral sulfate solution (OSS) with four different established cathartic regimens using an automated volumetric software tool at CT colonography (CTC). This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval. Volumetric analysis of residual contrast-tagged colonic fluid was performed on CTC studies in 263 adults (mean age 60.1 years; 137M/126F) using an automated volumetric software tool. Twenty-three patients receiving 177 mL OSS (SUPREP; single-bottle purgation) were compared with 60 patients each receiving 45 mL sodium phosphate (NaP), 90 mL NaP (2x NaP), 592 mL (two bottles) magnesium citrate (MgC), and 4,000 mL polyethylene glycol (PEG). All patients received oral contrast cleansing after catharsis. Data were analyzed with unpaired t test with Welch correction and F test. The mean volume of residual colonic fluid was less with OSS (125 +/- A 60 mL) than for established cathartic agents: 2x NaP (206 +/- A 125 mL, P < 0.0001), MgC (184 +/- A 125 mL, P < 0.01), PEG (166 +/- A 114 mL, P < 0.05), and NaP (165 +/- A 135 mL, P = 0.067). Variance of volumes was also significantly lower for OSS (range 28-251 mL) than for established agents (range 4-853 mL) (all P < 0.01). Mean fluid attenuation was higher with OSS (956 +/- A 168 HU) than for established agents (all P < 0.05): 2x NaP (455 +/- A 191 HU), MgC (691 +/- A 154 HU), NaP (779 +/- A 127 HU), and PEG (843 +/- A 193 HU). Automated volumetry allows rapid objective assessment of bowel preparation quality at CTC. Purgation with the novel oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) consistently resulted in less residual colonic fluid and higher fluid attenuation compared with established cathartic regimens.
    Abdominal Imaging 06/2014; 40(1). DOI:10.1007/s00261-014-0186-x · 1.73 Impact Factor