IGF-1 and BRCA1 signaling pathways in familial cancer

Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: .
The Lancet Oncology (Impact Factor: 24.73). 12/2012; 13(12):E537-44. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70362-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system has a direct effect on cellular proliferation and survival, and interacts with genetic and environmental factors implicated in causing cancer. Experimental, clinical, and epidemiological evidence show that the IGF signalling pathways are important mediators in the biochemical and molecular chain of events that lead from a phenotypically normal cell to one harbouring neoplastic traits. BRCA1 and BRCA2 have an important role in the development of hereditary and sporadic breast and ovarian cancer. Recent evidence suggests that risk of cancer conferred by BRCA mutations can be modified by genetic and environmental factors, including ambient concentrations of IGF-1 and polymorphisms in IGF system components. This Review addresses interactions between the IGF and BRCA1 signalling pathways, and emphasises the convergence of IGF-1-mediated cell survival, proliferative pathways, and BRCA1-mediated tumour protective pathways. Understanding the complex interactions between these signalling pathways might improve our understanding of basic molecular oncology processes and help to identify new molecular targets, predictive biomarkers, and approaches for optimising cancer therapies.

  • Source
    • "In addition to breast cancer, BRCA1 was identified as a transcriptional repressor of the IGF1R gene in prostate and endometrial cancer cells [45] [46]. AKT, a downstream target of IGF1, was shown to regulate BRCA1 stability [39]. Finally, studies revealed that IGF1 and IGF2 regulate BRCA1 levels at the transcriptional level [47] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IGF1R plays an important role in protection from apoptosis, regulation of cell growth, differentiation and oncogenic transformation. IGF1R aberrations lead to intrauterine and postnatal growth failure, microcephaly, mental retardation and deafness. High levels of IGF1R are detected in a diversity of human tumors. IGF1R gene transcription is controlled by complex interactions involving DNA-binding and non DNA-binding transcription factors. This review highlights selected examples of a series of tumor suppressors, including the breast cancer gene-1 (BRCA1), p53, the Wilm’s tumor protein-1 (WT1) and the von Hippel-Lindau gene (VHL), whose mechanisms of action involve regulation of IGF1R gene expression. IGF1R gene transcription is also dependent on the presence of stimulatory nuclear proteins, including zinc-finger protein Sp1, EWS-WT1, E2F1, Krüppel-like factor-6 (KLF6), high-mobility group A1 (HMGA1), and others. Loss-of-function of tumor suppressor genes, usually caused by mutations, may result in non-functional proteins unable to control IGF1R promoter activity. Impaired regulation of the IGF1R gene is linked to defective cell division, chromosomal instability and increased incidence of cancer.
    Growth Hormone & IGF Research 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ghir.2014.03.006 · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The specificity of the insulin receptor (InsR) and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) signaling pathways has been the focus of significant debate over the past few years. Recent evidence showing nuclear import and a direct transcriptional role for both InsR and IGF1R adds a new layer of complexity to this dialog. Hence, in addition to the classical roles associated with cell-surface receptors (eg, ligand binding, autophosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase domain, activation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and additional substrates, protein-protein interactions with membrane and cytoplasm components), new data are consistent with nuclear (genomic) role(s) for both InsR and IGF1R. The present review provides a brief overview of the physical and functional similarities and differences between InsR and IGF1R and describes data from a number of laboratories providing evidence for a new layer of signaling regulation (ie, the ability of InsR and IGF1R to translocate to the cell nucleus and to elicit genomic activities usually associated with transcription factors). The ability of InsR and IGF1R to function as transcription factors, although poorly understood, constitutes a new paradigm in signal transduction. Although research on the role of nuclear InsR/IGF1R is still in its infancy, we believe that this rapidly developing area may have a major basic and translational impact on the fields of metabolism, diabetes, and cancer. (Endocrinology 154: 1672-1679, 2013)
    Endocrinology 03/2013; 154(5):1672-1679. DOI:10.1210/en.2012-2165 · 4.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment of drug-resistant cancer is a clinical challenge, and thus screening for novel anticancer drugs is critically important. We recently demonstrated a strong enhancement of the antitumor activity of snake (Walterinnesia aegyptia) venom (WEV) in vitro in breast carcinoma, prostate cancer and multiple myeloma cell lines but not in normal cells when the venom was combined with silica nanoparticles (WEV+NP). In the present study, we investigated the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of WEV+NP in breast cancer- and prostate cancer-bearing experimental mouse models. Xenograft breast and prostate tumor mice models were randomized into 4 groups for each cancer model (10 mice per group) and were treated with vehicle (control), NP, WEV or WEV+NP daily for 28 days post tumor inoculation. The tumor volumes were monitored throughout the experiment. On day 28 post tumor inoculation, breast and prostate tumor cells were collected and either directly cultured for flow cytometry analysis or lysed for Western blot and ELISA analysis. Treatment with WEV+NP or WEV alone significantly reduced both breast and prostate tumor volumes compared to treatment with NP or vehicle alone. Compared to treatment with WEV alone, treatment of breast and prostate cancer cells with WEV+NP induced marked elevations in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), hydroperoxide and nitric oxide; robust reductions in the levels of the chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL12, CXCL13 and CXCL16 and decreased surface expression of their cognate chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5 and CXCR6; and subsequent reductions in the chemokine-dependent migration of both breast and prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, we found that WEV+NP strongly inhibited insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)- and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-mediated proliferation of breast and prostate cancer cells, respectively, and enhanced the induction of apoptosis by increasing the activity of caspase-3,-8 and -9 in both breast and prostate cancer cells. In addition, treatment of breast and prostate cancer cells with WEV+NP or WEV alone revealed that the combination of WEV with NP robustly decreased the phosphorylation of AKT, ERK and IκBα; decreased the expression of cyclin D1, survivin and the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and Mcl-1; markedly increased the expression of cyclin B1 and the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members Bak, Bax and Bim; altered the mitochondrial membrane potential; and subsequently sensitized tumor cells to growth arrest. Our data reveal the therapeutic potential of the nanoparticle-sustained delivery of snake venom against different cancer cell types.
    Free Radical Biology and Medicine 06/2013; 65. DOI:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.06.018 · 5.71 Impact Factor
Show more