A holistic view of happiness: Belief in the negative side of happiness is more prevalent in Japan than in the united states

PSYCHOLOGIA (Impact Factor: 0.09). 01/2011; 53(4):236-245. DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2010.236


Two studies tested the hypothesis that while Americans believe that happiness is an enduring positive state to be pursued by each individual, Japanese believe that it is a positive, but transitory interpersonal moment fraught with negative consequences such as others' envy and a reduced ability to attend to one's surroundings. Study 1 used a standard questionnaire method to show that people in Japanese cultural contexts have a more holistic concept of happiness than do people in European-American cultural contexts. Study 2 showed that this Japanese holistic view of happiness is associated with a holistic worldview rather than personal subjective well-being. This suggests that the holistic view of happiness is related to a dialectic thinking style prevalent in Japanese culture and unrelated to individual levels of subjective well-being. One Japanese woman was in a favorable situation. She was recently married, had a new job, and was living in a new and beautiful city. One day, however, she was injured. As a result, she was unable to walk for a month and had a difficult time completing the daily tasks many people take for granted, such as shopping and commuting to work. Such "lay theories" of happiness are quite prevalent in Japanese culture because people in that cultural context frequently believe that having too many positive outcomes is a sign of "negative things to come." In addition, they worry about negative consequences of feeling happiness, including the jealousy of others or a loss of motivation. For example, many Japanese think that if they feel happy, they will no longer put forth their greatest effort, thus diminishing their capacity for self-improvement. Notably, however, this kind of lay theory, called the holistic view of happiness, would be less likely to be accepted by European-American cultures than Japanese culture.

Download full-text


Available from: Yukiko Uchida,
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although lower dialectical thinking has been associated with greater extremity in consumer responses to univalent information, we demonstrate that low, as compared to high, dialectical thinkers express more moderate attitudes when they result from processing contradictory information. Specifically, our studies find that contradictory product information is less fluently processed by consumers low (vs. high) in dialectical thinking, which reduces their judgmental confidence and, in turn, generates more moderate attitudes. We contribute to the literature by showing that in contexts of contradictory information integration, current theory regarding the consequences of dialectical thinking needs to be extended to include not only an attenuation of the extremity effect prior research has found, but a complete reversal. Our results further imply that processing fluency not only impacts attitude valence but, more generally, attitude extremity.
    Journal of Consumer Psychology 04/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.03.001 · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite recent intense interest, happiness studies have been impeded by some conceptual and methodological problems, including viewing happiness (well-being/welfare) as different over different persons, as relative, multi-dimensional, non-cardinally measurable, interpersonally non-comparable and using non-cardinal and interpersonally non-comparable methods of happiness measurement. Using the evolutionary biology of happiness, this paper argues that happiness is absolute, universal, and uni-dimensional and is also cardinally measurable and interpersonally comparable. This is needed to make choices motivated by reward (pleasure) and punishment (pain) consistent with fitness maximization. However, happiness indices obtained by virtually all existing methods of happiness measurement are largely non-cardinal and non-comparable, making the use of averaging in group happiness indices of dubious philosophical validity. A method of measuring happiness to give cardinal and interpersonally comparable indices is discussed. These may contribute towards the more scientific study of happiness that is based on sounder methodological grounds as well as yielding more useful results.
    The Singapore Economic Review 09/2015; 60(4):1540001. DOI:10.1142/S0217590815400019 · 0.14 Impact Factor