Article

Pediatric Standard and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A Comparative Single Institution Study.

Division of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
The Journal of urology (Impact Factor: 3.75). 11/2012; DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT PURPOSE: We report our experience and compare the outcomes between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all children who underwent standard or robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction at a single institution from October 2007 to January 2012. Indications for surgery included symptomatic obstruction and abnormal diuretic renal scan. A successful outcome was defined as resolution of clinical symptoms, improvement of hydronephrosis on ultrasound, stable ultrasound with resolution of symptoms or improvement of the drainage curve on diuretic renal scan. RESULTS: We reviewed 18 patients (median age 8.1 years) who underwent standard and 46 (8.8 years) who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (p = 0.194). Median operative time was 298 minutes (range 145 to 387) for standard and 209 minutes (106 to 540) for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (p = 0.008). Mean hospitalization was similar between the groups (1 day for standard vs 2 days for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, p = 0.246). Narcotic use was similar between the groups. Median followup was 43 months for standard and 22 months for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (p <0.01). Renal ultrasound showed postoperative improvement of hydronephrosis in 85% and stable disease in 15% of patients following robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and improvement in 89.5% and stable disease in 10.5% after standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Symptoms resolved in 100% of patients (38 of 38) after robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and 87.5% of patients (7 of 8) after standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty are effective techniques to correct ureteropelvic junction obstruction, with similar outcomes. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty had a shorter operative time, and its success and complication rates are comparable to standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Edward Riachy, Jun 05, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
137 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We performed a population-based study comparing trends in perioperative outcomes and cost for open (OP), laparoscopic (LP), and robotic (RP) pediatric pyeloplasty. Specific billing items contributing to cost were also investigated. Using the Premier Perspective database, we identified 12,662 pediatric patients who underwent open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty (ICD-9 55.87) in the United States from 2003 - 2010. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to evaluate perioperative outcomes, complications, and costs for the competing surgical approaches. Propensity weighting was employed to minimize selection bias. Sampling weights were used to yield a nationally representative sample. A decrease in OP and a rise in minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) was observed. All procedures had low complication rates. Compared to OP, LP and RP had longer median operating room (OR) times (240 minutes, p<0.0001 and 270 minutes, p<0.0001, respectively). There was no difference in median length of stay (LOS). The median total cost was lower among patients undergoing OP versus RP ($7,221 vs $10,780, p<0.001). This cost difference was largely attributable to robotic supply costs. During the study period, OP made up a declining majority of cases. LP utilization plateaued, while RP increased. OR time was longer for MIP, while LOS was equivalent across all procedures. A higher cost associated with RP was driven by OR use and robotic equipment costs, which abrogated low room and board cost. This study reflects an adoption period for RP. With time, perioperative outcomes and cost may improve.
    The Journal of urology 10/2013; 191(4). DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.077 · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: We sought to determine current and longitudinal trends in the usage of open (OP), laparoscopic (LP), and robotic pyeloplasties. (RALP) Furthermore, we aimed to describe patient and hospital level characteristics associated with the use of minimally invasive pyeloplasties (MIP) and to compare basic utilization metrics for each approach. Materials/methods: The 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009 Kid's Inpatient Databases (KID) were used to determine current and longitudinal trends. As a result of a specific billing code for robotic surgery introduced in 2008, the 2009 KID database was used for analysis of RALP. Patient and hospital characteristics examined included: age, gender, race, insurance status, hospital location, and academic status. Utilization metrics of length of stay (LOS) and cost were determined from each modality. Results: In 2009, there were 3354 pediatric pyeloplasties performed in the USA (85% OP, 3% LP, 12% RP). Compared with 2000, this represents an 11.7% decrease in the overall number of pyeloplasties but a progressive increase in MIP from 0.34% in 2000 to 11.7%. Mean patient age was 3.7 years for OP, 9.3 years for LP and 9.9 years for RALP. MIP was more commonly performed in females, Caucasians, patients with private insurance, at urban hospitals and at teaching hospitals. Although length of stay (LOS) in days was statistically lower for MIP (3.46 OP, 2.86 LP, 1.96 RP, p < 0.001), total cost between the groups was not statistically different. On multi-variable logistic regression analysis, age (OR 1.17, p < 0.001) increased the odds of MIP whereas lack of private insurance decreased the odds of MIP (OR 0.62, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Although utilization of MIP is increasing in the USA, especially in older children, OP remains predominant. MIP was associated with a decrease in LOS. The odds of MIP were higher in older children, whereas the lack of private insurance decreased the odds of MIP.
    Journal of Pediatric Urology 07/2014; 10(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.06.010 · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To present our experience with infant pyeloplasty, comparing outcomes between robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and open pyeloplasty (OP). A retrospective review was performed of all children <1 year of age who underwent unilateral dismembered pyeloplasty at a single pediatric institution since January 2007. Patients with standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty were excluded. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, narcotic usage, and complications were reviewed. A total of 70 infants (51 boys and 19 girls) were identified, with nine RALP and 61 OP performed. Median age was 9.2 months (range, 3.7-11.9 months) for RALP and 4.1 months (range, 1.0-11.6 months) for OP (p = 0.005). Median weight was 8 kg (range, 5.8-10.9 kg) for RALP and 7 kg (range, 4-14 kg) for OP (p = 0.163). Median operative time was 115 min (range, 95-205 min) for RALP and 166 min (range, 79-300 min) for OP (p = 0.028). Median hospital stay was 1 day (range, 1-2 days) for RALP and 3 days (range, 1-7 days) for OP (p < 0.001). Median postoperative narcotic use of morphine equivalent was <0.01 mg/kg/day (range, 0-0.1 mg/kg/day) for RALP and 0.05 mg/kg/day (range, 0-2.2 mg/kg/day) for OP (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 7.2-17.8 months) for RALP and 43.6 months (3.4-73.8 months) for OP (p < 0.001). The success rate was 100% for RALP and 98% for OP. Infant RALP was observed to be feasible and efficacious with shorter operative time, hospital stay, and narcotic utilization than OP.
    Journal of pediatric urology 11/2013; 10(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.10.016 · 1.41 Impact Factor