Flawed meta-analysis of a flawed literature: commentary on Versteeg et al
Health Psychology Section, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.European journal of preventive cardiology 12/2012; 19(6):1381-2. DOI: 10.1177/2047487312437716
Full-textDOI: · Available from: Jacob De Voogd, Oct 07, 2015
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Finally, an additional criticism of Type D research is that the majority of studies investigating the influence of Type D on adverse clinical coronary outcomes have been conducted by a single group (Coyne et al., 2011; Smith, 2011). A recent meta-analysis which found support for a relationship between Type D personality and health status in coronary patients (Versteeg, Spek, Pedersen, & Denollet, 2012) was over-represented by studies from Denollet's group, whom also conducted the meta-analysis itself (Coyne & de Voogd, 2012). However, this same criticism cannot be levelled at the body of research which has investigated the relationship between Type D and physiological functioning in healthy individuals, which has been conducted by several different research groups. "
ABSTRACT: Abstract Previous research investigating the influence of Type D personality on cardiovascular reactivity to stress in healthy young adults is somewhat mixed. The present study sought to investigate this question using an ecologically valid laboratory stressor. Beat-to-beat blood pressure and heart rate were measured in 77 healthy young adults during exposure to multitasking stress. Mood and background stress were both associated with Type D personality when Type D was conceptualised as a dimensional construct, with less robust findings observed using the traditional dichotomous typological approach. However, the continuous Type D construct added limited predictive value of the self-report measures above that of its constituent components, negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI). Further, an inverse relationship between the continuous Type D construct and blood pressure reactivity to multitasking stress was observed. In summary, our findings suggest that Type D personality is predictive of blunted cardiovascular reactivity to stress in healthy individuals when Type D is considered as a dimensional construct and the independent influence of NA and SI is controlled for. Further, our findings suggest that Type D does not predict additional variance in mood and background stress above that of NA and SI when these constituent factors are considered independently.Psychology & Health 04/2014; 29(10):1-38. DOI:10.1080/08870446.2014.915970 · 1.95 Impact Factor