Standard Operating Procedures for Vascular Surgery in Erectile Dysfunction: Revascularization and Venous Procedures
Department of Urology, Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany San Diego Sexual Medicine, Alvarado Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA Andromeda Andrology Center, Hyderabad, AP, India.Journal of Sexual Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.15). 11/2012; 10(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02997.x
Introduction. The impact of penile blood supply on erectile function was recognized some 500 years ago. At the turn of the 20th century first results of penile venous ligation were published and in 1973 the first surgical attempts to restore penile arterial inflow were undertaken. Numerous techniques were published in the meantime, but inclusion criteria, patient selection, and success evaluation differed extremely between study groups. Aim. To develop evidence-based standard operating procedures (SOPs) for vascular surgery in erectile dysfunction, based on recent state of the art consensus reports and recently published articles in peer-reviewed journals. Methods. Based on the recent publication of the consensus process during the 2009 International Consultation on Sexual Medicine in Paris, recommendations are derived for diagnosis and surgical treatment of vascular erectile dysfunction. In addition several recent publications in this field not mentioned in the consensus statements are included in the discussion. Main Outcome Measure. The Oxford system of evidence-based review was systematically applied. Due to the generally low level of evidence in this field expert opinions were accepted, if published after a well-defined consensus process in peer-reviewed journals. Results. Referring to penile revascularization it may be concluded, that in the face of missing randomized trials, only recommendations grade D may be given: this kind of surgery may be offered to men less than 55 years, who are nonsmokers, nondiabetic, and demonstrate isolated arterial stenoses in the absence of generalized vascular disease. The evidence level for recommendations concerning penile venous ligations may be even lower. Too many unsolved controversies exist and universal diagnostic criteria for patient selection as well as operative technique selection have not been unequivocally established. This kind of surgery is still considered investigational but may be offered in special situations on an individualized basis in an investigational or research setting after obtaining written consent, using both pre- and postoperatively validated measuring instruments of success evaluation. Conclusions. SOPs for penile revascularization procedures can be developed, concerning a highly selected patient group with isolated arterial stenoses. Based on the available data it is not yet possible to define SOPs for surgical treatment of corporal veno-occlusive dysfunction. Sohn M, Hatzinger M, Goldstein I, and Krishnamurti S. Standard operating procedures for vascular surgery in erectile dysfunction: Revascularization and venous procedures. J Sex Med **;**:**-**.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: IntroductionPenile revascularization is a surgical treatment option for erectile dysfunction (ED) in healthy individuals due to a focal arterial occlusion in the absence of generalized vascular disease. Most described failures have been attributed to graft stenosis or disruption of the anastomosis.AimWe report a novel phenomenon called Penile Artery Shunt Syndrome that contributed to persistent ED in a patient after penile microvascular arterial bypass surgery.MethodsA 26-year-old man presented for evaluation of long-standing ED, which was attributed to trauma sustained 12 years earlier. He had difficulty obtaining and maintaining erections despite oral pharmacotherapy. Clinical data related to the case were studied, analyzed, and reviewed with urologic and radiologic specialists at multiple centers that collaborated in the care of this patient.Main Outcome MeasuresPenile duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocities and five-item International Index for Erectile Function questionnaire scores were the main outcome measures.ResultsInitial diagnostic workup of the patient confirmed severe insufficiency of the left cavernosal artery, with no evidence of venous leak. The patient underwent penile microvascular arterial bypass surgery with anastomosis of the left inferior epigastric artery to the left dorsal penile artery. The patient had persistence of severe ED despite patent anastomosis by penile duplex ultrasound. Subsequent arteriography revealed an arterial shunt due to an aberrant obturator artery arising from the donor inferior epigastric artery. The patient underwent embolization of the aberrant obturator artery, with resolution of the shunt and marked improvement in erectile function.Conclusions The presence of an aberrant obturator artery arising from the inferior epigastric artery may predispose to persistent ED after revascularization due to the creation of a shunt phenomenon. Pelvic arteriography may be useful in identifying anomalous anatomic considerations prior to penile revascularization and to evaluate patients with persistent postoperative ED. Pavlinec JG, Hakky TS, Yang C, Massis K, Munarriz R, and Carrion RE. Penile Artery Shunt Syndrome: A novel cause of erectile dysfunction after penile revascularization surgery. J Sex Med **;**:**–**.Journal of Sexual Medicine 05/2014; 11(9). DOI:10.1111/jsm.12543 · 3.15 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: IntroductionComplications of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) are rare, nevertheless can be grave. In cases with veno-occlusive dysfunction (VOD), alternative surgical techniques such as dorsal vein ligation (DVL) are controversial. Some patients may opt for trial at DVL to avoid the possible complications of PPI. However, this may be associated with disappointment if DVL fails and another procedure is required.AimThe aim if this study is to evaluate the results of a combined approach involving DVL, same-session testing by intracavernous injection (ICI) of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), and immediate implantation of a penile prosthesis (PPI) in case of poor response to DVL.Main Outcome MeasuresLong-term erectile function in cases with favorable intraoperative response to DVL.Methods Twenty-six patients with refractory VOD were operated upon. Through a peno-pubic incision, DVL was performed, followed by ICI of 20 µg PGE1 in two divided doses, 10 µg each, 15 minutes apart. Group 1 exhibited full rigidity in response to the first dose. Group 2 exhibited full rigidity in response to the second dose. PPI was not performed for either. Group 3 exhibited suboptimal response to both doses, and PPI was performed through the same incision. Patients were followed up from 24 to 48 months using International Index of Erectile Function-5 scoring.ResultsFor Group 1 (n = 8), six patients experienced normal erectile function following DVL throughout the whole follow-up period of 48 months (23.1% of all patients), and two patients relapsed. Group 2 (n = 6) (23.1%) reported normal erectile function for an average of 6 months, then relapsed. Group 3 (n = 12) had a penile prosthesis implanted in the same setting.Conclusion Combined DVL-ICI-PPI can spare around 23.1% of young patients with VOD from PPI, at no additional risk. Full response to 10 µg PGE1 at intraoperative testing carries good prognosis to DVL on the long run. Investigation of a larger number of patients is necessary before reaching a final conclusion.Journal of Sexual Medicine 06/2014; 11(9). DOI:10.1111/jsm.12582 · 3.15 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: IntroductionPenile revascularization (PR) is a potentially curative procedure for young men with isolated arteriogenic erectile dysfunction. Standard preoperative evaluation is erectile hemodynamics (HDX) using duplex Doppler penile ultrasound (DUS) and/or cavernosometry (DIC) and assessment of cavernosal arterial anatomy by selective internal pudendal arteriography (SIPA).AimThe aim of this study was to review our experience with men who sought a second opinion from us regarding their candidacy for PR.Method Study population consisted of men (i) who presented to us for a second opinion regarding PR; (ii) who had DUS/DIC and SIPA; and (iii) had been advised by outside surgeon to undergo PR. Review of the HDX study and SIPA was conducted. Discrepancies between these studies resulted in repeating the DIC in men with normal SIPA or repeating the SIPA in men with normal HDX studies.Main Outcome MeasuresDiscrepancies between HDX and SIPA and the results of repeat HDX or SIPA were the main outcome measures.ResultForty-five patients participated in the study; mean age was 33 years with 4% ≥50 years old. Median vascular risk factor number was 1 (ranged 0–3). A credible trauma history was present in 11%. Thirty-three percent had prior DIC and 49% of patients had a significant discrepancy between HDX study and SIPA, including all patients seen by a community urologist. Thirty-eight percent had a discrepancy between side of abnormality on HDX and SIPA where both studies were abnormal (group A). Seven percent had abnormal HDX and normal SIPA (group B). Four percent had a normal HDX study with an abnormal SIPA (group C). Repeat DIC (n = 20) was conducted in groups A + B and was normal in 70% of cases. Repeat SIPA (n = 2) was conducted in group C and was normal in both patients.Conclusion Almost one half of patients had a significant discrepancy between HDX and SIPA. Of these, 73% had normal repeat studies, making them no longer candidates for penile revascularization. Dabaja AA, Teloken P, and Mulhall JP. A critical analysis of candidacy for penile revascularization. J Sex Med **;**:**–**.Journal of Sexual Medicine 06/2014; 11(9). DOI:10.1111/jsm.12594 · 3.15 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.