Deslorelin implants control fertility in urban brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) without negatively influencing their body-condition index

CSIRO Wildlife Research (Impact Factor: 1.19). 01/2009; 36(4):324–332. DOI: 10.1071/WR08050

ABSTRACT Wild brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) occur in large numbers in the grounds of Perth Zoo, Western Australia. These possums are a problem because they consume feed the zoo buys for its captive animals, damage seedlings and trees and many need to be treated for injuries sustained during fights with conspecifics. A contraceptive implant, which contains the gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist deslorelin, could be a potential method of managing this population. We tested the efficacy of the implant and its impact on the body-condition index of treated possums with Kaplan–Meier analysis and a mixed model with residual maximum likelihood. We implanted 60 female possums with deslorelin and monitored reproductive success of treated and untreated possums for the following 18 months. At the conclusion of the study, 80% of 20 treated females recaptured had shown no evidence of breeding activity, giving an average minimum duration of effective contraception of 381 days. The implant did not have a negative impact on the body-condition index of treated possums during the course of the study. Our results suggest that deslorelin implants could be an effective management tool for brushtail possums at Perth Zoo and in other urban environments.


Available from: Roberta Bencini, Jun 07, 2015
  • CSIRO Wildlife Research 07/2013; 40(5):403-412. DOI:10.1071/WR13050 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hormonally-induced fertility control is increasingly used to manage overabundant wildlife where political or ethical considerations exclude culling or translocations. By altering reproductive rates, fertility control risks accelerating the loss of genetic variation from isolated wildlife populations if control is biased against particular genotypes. This is most likely in spatially structured populations, but information on patterns of genetic exchange can be difficult to ascertain by observation or trapping. Fertility control was proposed to manage an isolated but overabundant population of the black-flanked rock-wallaby, Petrogale lateralis lateralis, at Mt Caroline Nature Reserve, south-western Australia. This species typically inhabits large granite outcrops, where refuges within outcrops are often patchily distributed, and there is strong potential for population structure. We used fine-scale analysis of microsatellite DNA variation to establish the pre-fertility control extent of population structuring and the relative extent of gene flow in males and females in an isolated population of black-flanked rock-wallabies. Bayesian model-based clustering and fixation statistics revealed that overall gene flow is extensive, but two areas of refuge were genetically distinct from distant neighbours. Spatial autocorrelation analyses indicated that female-mediated gene flow was less extensive than male-mediated gene flow. Our results indicate that it would be desirable to apply fertility control to female rock wallabies within defined genetic isolates, but fertility control could be applied in a spatially random manner to males.
    Conservation Genetics 10/2014; 15(5). DOI:10.1007/s10592-014-0598-8 · 1.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As human populations grow, conflicts with wildlife increase. Concurrently, concerns about the welfare, safety and environmental impacts of conventional lethal methods of wildlife management restrict the options available for conflict mitigation. In parallel, there is increasing interest in using fertility control to manage wildlife. The present review aimed at analysing trends in research on fertility control for wildlife, illustrating developments in fertility-control technologies and delivery methods of fertility-control agents, summarising the conclusions of empirical and theoretical studies of fertility control applied at the population level and offering criteria to guide decisions regarding the suitability of fertility control to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts. The review highlighted a growing interest in fertility control for wildlife, underpinned by increasing numbers of scientific studies. Most current practical applications of fertility control for wild mammals use injectable single-dose immunocontraceptive vaccines mainly aimed at sterilising females, although many of these vaccines are not yet commercially available. One oral avian contraceptive, nicarbazin, is commercially available in some countries. Potential new methods of remote contraceptive delivery include bacterial ghosts, virus-like particles and genetically modified transmissible and non-transmissible organisms, although none of these have yet progressed to field testing. In parallel, new species-specific delivery systems have been developed. The results of population-level studies of fertility control indicated that this approach may increase survival and affect social and spatial behaviour of treated animals, although the effects are species-and context-specific. The present studies suggested that a substantial initial effort is generally required to reduce population growth if fertility control is the sole wildlife management method. However, several empirical and field studies have demonstrated that fertility control, particularly of isolated populations, can be successfully used to limit population growth and reduce human–wildlife conflicts. In parallel, there is growing recognition of the possible synergy between fertility control and disease vaccination to optimise the maintenance of herd immunity in the management of wildlife diseases. The review provides a decision tree that can be used to determine whether fertility control should be employed to resolve specific human–wildlife conflicts. These criteria encompass public consultation, considerations about animal welfare and feasibility, evaluation of population responses, costs and sustainability.
    CSIRO Wildlife Research 01/2014; 41:1-21. DOI:10.1071/WR13141 · 1.19 Impact Factor