[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This review presents an update on classification, diagnosis and potentially 'drugable' molecular alterations of small cell carcinoma (SCC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung.
The main controversies in the classification of lung neuroendocrine tumors are: whether SCC and LCNEC should remain separated or should be unified into a high-grade category; and what the role is of Ki67 as an adjunct to the classical parameters (mitotic rate and necrosis). Regarding the diagnosis of SCC and LCNEC, in difficult cases it requires the combined evaluation of clinical-radiological data, histological and cytological material and selected immunostains. The prognosis of both tumors remains very poor. Despite the promising identification of potential molecular targets on preclinical studies, including antiangiogenetic drugs and tricyclic antidepressants, at the moment no specific molecular-driven therapy is available.
The field of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas remains complex in several respects, and studies on molecular targets are urgently needed.
Current opinion in pulmonary medicine 05/2014; 20(4). DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000061 · 2.76 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.