Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics

Educational Psychologist (Impact Factor: 3.29). 01/2012; 47(3):189-203. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2012.667065

ABSTRACT This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this cross-national study is to understand teachers’ views about the meaning of instructional coherence and the ways to achieve instructional coherence. With respect to the meaning of instructional coherence, whereas the majority of U.S. teachers paid attention to connections between teaching activities, lessons, or topics, the majority of Chinese teachers emphasized the interconnected nature of mathematical knowledge beyond the teaching flow. U.S. teachers expressed their views about ways to achieve instructional coherence through managing a complete lesson structure. In contrast, Chinese teachers emphasized pre-design of teaching sequences, transitional language and questioning based on the study of textbooks and students beforehand. Moreover, they emphasized addressing student thinking and dealing with emerging events in order to achieve “real” coherence. The findings of the study contribute to our understanding about the meaning of instructional coherence and ways to achieve instructional coherence in different cultural contexts.
    Educational Studies in Mathematics 01/2014; · 0.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proportional reasoning as the capacity to compare situations in relative (multiplicative) rather than absolute (additive) terms is an important outcome of primary school mathematics. Research suggests that students tend to see comparative situations in additive rather than multiplicative terms and this thinking can influence their capacity for proportional reasoning in later years. In this paper, excerpts from a classroom case study of a fourth-grade classroom (students aged 9) are presented as they address an inquiry problem that required proportional reasoning. As the inquiry unfolded, students' additive strategies were progressively seen to shift to proportional thinking to enable them to answer the question that guided their inquiry. In wrestling with the challenges they encountered, their emerging proportional reasoning was supported by the inquiry model used to provide a structure, a classroom culture of inquiry and argumentation, and the proportionality embedded in the problem context.
    Mathematics Education Research Journal 01/2014; 26(1):1-31.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research in both cognitive and educational psychology has explored the effect of different types of external knowledge representations (e.g., manipulatives, graphical/pictorial representations, texts) on a variety of important outcome measures. We place this large and multifaceted research literature into an organizing framework, classifying three categories of external knowledge representations along a dimension of groundedness: (1) idealized, (2) grounded and including only relevant features, and (3) grounded and including irrelevant features. This organizing framework allows us to focus on the implications of these characteristics of external knowledge representations on three important educational outcomes: learning and immediate performance using the target knowledge, the degree to which that knowledge can transfer flexibly, and the interest engendered by the learning materials. We illustrate the framework by mapping a wide body of research from educational and cognitive psychology onto its dimensions. This framework can aid educators by clearly stating what the research literature says about these characteristics of external knowledge representations and how they activate and support the construction of internal knowledge representations. In particular, it will speak to how to best structure instruction using external knowledge representations with different characteristics, depending on the learning objective. Researchers will benefit from the analysis of the current state of knowledge and by the description of what open questions still remain.
    Educational Psychology Review 01/2014; · 2.40 Impact Factor


Available from
May 31, 2014