Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making

Psychological Inquiry (Impact Factor: 4.73). 10/2010; 21:338-353. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2010.520260

ABSTRACT Intuition represents an enormous challenge for research on decision making. What is intuition? How does it modify our appreciation of cognitive abilities? When should people trust intuition? These questions set the agenda for this article, which (a) defines intuition, (b) comments on how intuition has been viewed across time in the decision making literature, (c) stresses the need to specify different types of intuition, (d) discusses when intuition is likely to lead to good decisions, and (e) presents four challenges. These are, first, elucidating the evolution of preferences; second, illuminating culturally acquired values such as morals; third, the need to educate intuitive responses; and fourth, problems in using intuition for decision making in a changing world. However, the major challenge facing intuition research is the need for conceptual work to define the nature and scope of different intuitive phenomena. To be useful, the concept should not become too broad.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major challenge for Dual Process Theories of reasoning is to predict the circumstances under which intuitive answers reached on the basis of Type 1 processing are kept or discarded in favour of analytic, Type 2 processing (Thompson 2009). We propose that a key determinant of the probability that Type 2 processes intervene is the affective response that accompanies Type 1 processing. This affective response arises from the fluency with which the initial answer is produced, such that fluently produced answers give rise to a strong feeling of rightness. This feeling of rightness, in turn, determines the extent and probability with which Type 2 processes will be engaged. Because many of the intuitions produced by Type 1 processes are fluent, it is common for them to be accompanied by a strong sense of rightness. However, because fluency is poorly calibrated to objective difficulty, confidently held intuitions may form the basis of poor quality decisions.
    Mind & Society 01/2012; 11(1).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: • Eine empirische Untersuchung und Praxisbeispiele zeigen, dass Führungskräfte sowohl analytische als auch intuitive Entscheidungen treffen. • Ob sie sich auf Zahlen und Fakten oder auf ihre Intuition stützen, ist allerdings in hohem Maße von der Entscheidungssituation und dem jeweiligen Entscheidungsträger abhängig. • Da Intuition unbewusst ist, benötigen Führungskräfte insbesondere bei intuitiven Entscheidungen die Unterstützung durch das Controlling. • Die Aufgabe des Controllings ist dabei, Führungskräfte bei kontrollierbarem Risiko zu intuitiven Entscheidungen zu ermutigen und gleichzeitig Intuitionsdefekte aufzudecken und einzugrenzen. • Harte Fakten und Analysen sind für gute Unternehmensentscheidungen ebenso wichtig wie Intuition. • Je größer die Erfahrung und das Wissen der Führungskräfte, desto verlässlicher sind ihre intuitiven Entscheidungen. • Die besten Entscheidungen werden getroffen, wenn das Bauchgefühl durch Zahlen und Analysen bestätigt wird. • Das Controlling soll Führungskräfte situationsabhängig zu intuitiven Entscheidungen ermutigen und bei Selbstüberschätzung Intuition einbremsen.
    Controlling & Management Review. 06/2013; 57(3):14-22.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using the critical incident technique, we investigated how 88 loan officers at four Swedish banks perceived their decision making in evaluations of commercial loan applications. First, we found that our sample of loan officers primarily used deliberation and less intuition when making decisions. Second, that the loan officers had greater difficulty in making decisions that involved soft information (e.g., client relationships) than decisions that involved hard information (e.g., financial information). Third, most decision making situations involved existing rather than new clients and low rather than high risk levels. Finally, we found a potential effect of organizational factors such as lending practices on lending decisions. Our findings have general implications for research on decision making processes. For the banking industry, this research identifies and elucidates the difficulties loan officers face in decision making of commercial loans.
    European Management Journal 04/2014; 32(2):362–372. · 0.80 Impact Factor