Article

Cognitive decline in older adults with a history of traumatic brain injury.

Traumatic Brain Injury Research Laboratory, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA.
The Lancet Neurology (Impact Factor: 21.82). 12/2012; 11(12):1103-12. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70226-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important public health problem with potentially serious long-term neurobehavioural sequelae. There is evidence to suggest that a history of TBI can increase a person's risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. However, individuals with dementia do not usually have a history of TBI, and survivors of TBI do not invariably acquire dementia later in life. Instead, a history of traumatic brain injury, combined with brain changes associated with normal ageing, might lead to exacerbated cognitive decline in older adults. Strategies to increase or maintain cognitive reserve might help to prevent exacerbated decline after TBI. Systematic clinical assessment could help to differentiate between exacerbated cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment, a precursor of Alzheimer's disease, with important implications for patients and their families.

1 Follower
 · 
139 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The long-term effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) can resemble those observed in normal ageing, suggesting that TBI may accelerate the ageing process. We investigate this using a neuroimaging model that predicts brain age in healthy individuals and then apply it to TBI patients. We define individuals' differences in chronological and predicted structural ‘brain age', and test whether TBI produces progressive atrophy and how this relates to cognitive function.MethodsA predictive model of normal ageing was defined using machine learning in 1537 healthy individuals, based on MRI-derived estimates of grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM). This ageing model was then applied to test 99 TBI patients and 113 healthy controls to estimate ‘brain age'.ResultsThe initial model accurately predicted age in healthy individuals (r = 0.92). TBI brains were estimated to be ‘older', with a mean predicted age difference (PAD) between chronological and estimated brain age of 4.66 years (± 10.8) for GM and 5.97 years (± 11.22) for WM. This PAD predicted cognitive impairment and correlated strongly with the time since TBI, indicating that brain tissue loss increases throughout the chronic post-injury phase.InterpretationTBI patients' brains were estimated to be ‘older' than their chronological age. This discrepancy increases with time since injury, suggesting that TBI accelerates the rate of brain atrophy. This may be an important factor in the increased susceptibility in TBI patients for dementia and other age-associated conditions, motivating further research into the ‘age-like' effects of brain injury and other neurological diseases. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Annals of Neurology 01/2015; 77(4). DOI:10.1002/ana.24367 · 11.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Network science provides theoretical, computational, and empirical tools that can be used to understand the structure and function of the human brain in novel ways using simple concepts and mathematical representations. Network neuroscience is a rapidly growing field that is providing considerable insight into human structural connectivity, functional connectivity while at rest, changes in functional networks over time (dynamics), and how these properties differ in clinical populations. In addition, a number of studies have begun to quantify network characteristics in a variety of cognitive processes and provide a context for understanding cognition from a network perspective. In this review, we outline the contributions of network science to cognitive neuroscience. We describe the methodology of network science as applied to the particular case of neuroimaging data and review its uses in investigating a range of cognitive functions including sensory processing, language, emotion, attention, cognitive control, learning, and memory. In conclusion, we discuss current frontiers and the specific challenges that must be overcome to integrate these complementary disciplines of network science and cognitive neuroscience. Increased communication between cognitive neuroscientists and network scientists could lead to significant discoveries under an emerging scientific intersection known as cognitive network neuroscience.
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 03/2015; DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00810 · 4.69 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
195 Downloads
Available from
May 17, 2014