Planned home birth: the professional responsibility response-a midwifery response Reply

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.97). 11/2012; 209(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This article addresses the recrudescence of and new support for midwife-supervised planned home birth in the United States and the other developed countries in the context of professional responsibility. Advocates of planned home birth have emphasized patient safety, patient satisfaction, cost effectiveness, and respect for women's rights. We provide a critical evaluation of each of these claims and identify professionally appropriate responses of obstetricians and other concerned physicians to planned home birth. We start with patient safety and show that planned home birth has unnecessary, preventable, irremediable increased risk of harm for pregnant, fetal, and neonatal patients. We document that the persistently high rates of emergency transport undermines patient safety and satisfaction, the raison d'etre of planned home birth, and that a comprehensive analysis undermines claims about the cost-effectiveness of planned home birth. We then argue that obstetricians and other concerned physicians should understand, identify, and correct the root causes of the recrudescence of planned home birth; respond to expressions of interest in planned home birth by women with evidence-based recommendations against it; refuse to participate in planned home birth; but still provide excellent and compassionate emergency obstetric care to women transported from planned home birth. We explain why obstetricians should not participate in or refer to randomized clinical trials of planned home vs planned hospital birth. We call on obstetricians, other concerned physicians, midwives and other obstetric providers, and their professional associations not to support planned home birth when there are safe and compassionate hospital-based alternatives and to advocate for a safe home-birth-like experience in the hospital.


Available from: Laurence B Mccullough, Jun 02, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study exposes doctors' and midwives' perceptions and misperceptions regarding home birth by exam-ining their views on childbirth in general and on risk associated with home births in particular. It relies on an approach of risk communication and an anthropological framework. In a qualitative-constructive study, 19 in-depth interviews were conducted with hospital doctors, hospital midwives, home-birth midwives, and a home-birth obstetrician. Our findings reveal that hospital midwives and doctors suffer from lack of exposure to home births, leading to disagreement regarding norms and risk; it also revealed sexist or patri-archal worldviews. Recommendations include improving communication between home-birth midwives and hospital counterparts; increased exposure of hospital doctors to home birth, creating new protocols in collaboration with home-birth midwives; and establishing a national database of home births.
    Journal of Perinatal Education 01/2015; 24(1):25-36. DOI:10.1891/1058-1243.24.1.25
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Even though vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) is recommended, an out-of-hospital setting is discussed controversially. First of all, uterine rupture and placental complications are named. Nevertheless, an increasing number of women with a prior Caesarean section decide to give birth in an out-of-hospital setting. What is the maternal and neonatal outcome in international studies in these cases? Method: The databases of Medline, Cinahl, Embase and Cochrane Library on vaginal birth after Caesarean section in out-of-hospital settings were searched. Included are studies in German and English language without a limit on year of publication, which describe maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results: 5 studies were found. All of them describe a high VBAC rate (73.5-98 %). Only one study found uterine ruptures. Haemorrhage/placental complications were described in 2 studies (0.5 and 1.7 %). None of the studies found maternal deaths. Neonatal death was described in 3 studies in a range from 0-1.7 %. Discussion: There is a wide difference in the population of the studies. An important difference is the parity of the women and the prior mode of birth. 4 of the 5 studies do not see a reason not to try VBAC in an out-of-hospital setting. Further studies are necessary to inform the increasing number of women who decide to try VBAC in an out-of-hospital setting.
    Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie 10/2014; 218(5):195-202. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1385919 · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Women's heightened interest in choice of birthplace and increased rates of planned home birth in the United States have been well documented, yet there remains significant public and professional debate about the ethics of planned home birth in jurisdictions where care is not clearly integrated across birth settings. Simultaneously, the quality of interprofessional interactions is recognized as a predictor of health outcomes during obstetric events. When care is transferred across birth settings, confusion and conflict among providers with respect to roles and responsibilities can adversely affect both outcomes and the experience of care for women and newborns. This article reviews findings of recent North American studies that examine provider attitudes toward planned home birth, differing concepts of safety of birthplace as reported by women and providers, and sources of conflict among maternity care providers during transfer from home to hospital. Emerging evidence and clinical exemplars can inform the development of systems for seamless transfer of women and newborns from planned home births to hospital and improve experience and perceptions of safety among families and providers. Three successful models in the United States that have enhanced multidisciplinary cooperation and coordination of care across birth settings are described. Finally, best practice guidelines for roles, communication, and mutual accommodation among all participating providers when transfer occurs are introduced. Research, health professional education, and policy recommendations for incorporation of key components into existing health care systems in the United States are included. © 2014 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
    Journal of midwifery & women's health 11/2014; 59(6):624-34. DOI:10.1111/jmwh.12251 · 1.04 Impact Factor