Patterns of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Randomized Survey of Oregon Clinicians

Oregon Genetics Program, Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, OR 97232, USA.
Journal of Cancer Epidemiology 10/2012; 2012(2):294730. DOI: 10.1155/2012/294730
Source: PubMed


Introduction. Appropriate use of genetic tests for population-based cancer screening, diagnosis of inherited cancers, and guidance of cancer treatment can improve health outcomes. We investigated clinicians' use and knowledge of eight breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer genetic tests. Methods. We conducted a randomized survey of 2,191 Oregon providers, asking about their experience with fecal DNA, OncoVue, BRCA, MMR, CYP2D6, tumor gene expression profiling, UGT1A1, and KRAS. Results. Clinicians reported low confidence in their knowledge of medical genetics; most confident were OB-GYNs and specialists. Clinicians were more likely to have ordered/recommended BRCA and MMR than the other tests, and OB-GYNs were twice as likely to have ordered/recommended BRCA testing than primary care providers. Less than 10% of providers ordered/recommended OncoVue, fecal DNA, CYP2D6, or UGT1A1; less than 30% ordered/recommended tumor gene expression profiles or KRAS. The most common reason for not ordering/recommending these tests was lack of familiarity. Conclusions. Use of appropriate, evidence-based testing can help reduce incidence and mortality of certain cancers, but these tests need to be better integrated into clinical practice. Continued evaluation of emerging technologies, dissemination of findings, and an increase in provider confidence and knowledge are necessary to achieve this end.


Available from: Amy Zlot, Jun 22, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) has sparked much controversy and undergone dramatic changes in its brief history. Debates over appropriate health policies regarding DTC-GT would benefit from empirical research on its benefits, harms, and limitations. We review the recent literature (2011-present) and summarize findings across (1) content analyses of DTC-GT websites, (2) studies of consumer perspectives and experiences, and (3) surveys of relevant health care providers. Findings suggest that neither the health benefits envisioned by DTC-GT proponents (e.g., significant improvements in positive health behaviors) nor the worst fears expressed by its critics (e.g., catastrophic psychological distress and misunderstanding of test results, undue burden on the health care system) have materialized to date. However, research in this area is in its early stages and possesses numerous key limitations. We note needs for future studies to illuminate the impact of DTC-GT and thereby guide practice and policy regarding this rapidly evolving approach to personal genomics.
    09/2013; 1(3):182-200. DOI:10.1007/s40142-013-0018-2
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Perry Payne argues that the health care system should encourage provision of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for most people in the near future. Payne's essay contains two distinct claims. One claim is that near-universal access to WGS would be beneficial both to individuals and to populations who, without it, could be on the losing end of widening health disparities. The second claim is that the preventive services provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) should be invoked to establish legal entitlements to WGS, without any patient cost sharing. We believe there are strong reasons to reject both of these claims. Indeed, the reasons that count against providing wide access to WGS are the very same reasons that undermine Payne's argument for providing WGS under the preventive services provisions of the ACA.
    Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law 11/2013; 39(1). DOI:10.1215/03616878-2395247 · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer is the most common cancer amongst women in the United States and around the world. Although widespread use of adjuvant chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents has improved mortality from breast cancer, it remains challenging to determine on an individual basis who will benefit from such treatments and who will be likely to encounter toxicities. With the rising costs of healthcare and the introduction of new targeted therapies, use of biomarkers has emerged as a method of assisting with breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of therapeutic response, and surveillance of disease during and after treatment. In the following review, prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers, their utility in the management of patients with breast cancer, and current recommendations regarding their clinical use will be discussed.
    Current pharmaceutical design 11/2013; 20(30). DOI:10.2174/1381612819666131125145517 · 3.45 Impact Factor
Show more