Parkinson disease and driving An evidence-based review

From the Departments of Aging and Geriatric Research (A.M.C.) and Occupational Therapy (A.M.C., S.C.)
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 11/2012; 79(20):2067-2074. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182749e95
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The growing literature on driving in Parkinson disease (PD) has shown that driving is impaired in PD compared to healthy comparison drivers. PD is a complex neurodegenerative disorder leading to motor, cognitive, and visual impairments, all of which can affect fitness to drive. In this review, we examined studies of driving performance (on-road tests and simulators) in PD for outcome measures and their predictors. We searched through various databases and found 25 (of 99) primary studies, all published in English. Using the American Academy of Neurology criteria, a study class of evidence was assigned (I-IV, I indicating the highest level of evidence) and recommendations were made (Level A: predictive or not; B: probably predictive or not; C: possibly predictive or not; U: no recommendations). From available Class II and III studies, we identified various cognitive, visual, and motor measures that met different levels of evidence (usually Level B or C) with respect to predicting on-road and simulated driving performance. Class I studies reporting Level A recommendations for definitive predictors of driving performance in drivers with PD are needed by policy makers and clinicians to develop evidence-based guidelines.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aims: Factors related to fall risk (balance confidence, motor, visual, and cognitive deficits) may also affect the driving practices of people with Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of this study was to explore these potential associations. Methods: A sample of 11 self-reported fallers (mean age 72.3 ± 6.0 years; 55% men) and 16 non-fallers (mean age 71.1 ± 7.2 years; 100% men) were assessed on a battery of clinical measures and brake reaction and response time. Electronic devices were installed in vehicles to examine naturalistic driving practices. Results: In the sample overall, lower balance confidence scores were associated with worse contrast sensitivity, higher levodopa equivalency dosage, and more reported driving avoidance. Fallers had significantly lower balance confidence (p < 0.01), more episodes of hard braking (p < 0.05), and drove at slower speeds (km/hour) on most roadways (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Researchers and clinicians should consider mobility problems, particularly recurrent falls and balance confidence, which may influence driving practices.
    Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 12/2014; DOI:10.3109/02703181.2014.991057
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Systematic reviews of literature relevant to driving and community mobility for older adults are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for the systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy assessments and interventions for driving and community mobility for older adults. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review, a summary of the themes of the results, the strengths and limitations of the findings, and the implications for practice, education, and research are presented.
    The American journal of occupational therapy.: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 11/2014; 68(6):657-661. DOI:10.5014/ajot.2014.013425 · 1.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For mobility impaired people with Parkinson's disease (PD), driving a car is important to maintain independency. But driving ability is getting worse with disease progression. Meanwhile surgical treatment with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus is done routinely in advanced PD, but it is unknown how DBS might affect driving. In a driving simulator setting, we found PD patients undergone DBS surgery to drive safer than even less clinically affected PD patients treated with medication alone. Furthermore, patients with DBS surgery drove better under stimulation than under medication. In conclusion, DBS of the subthalamic nucleus appears to be beneficial for driving in PD patients, potentially due to non-motor effects on controlling the vehicle in the simulator setting. Nevertheless, results of this first pilot study on driving in PD patients with DBS should not encourage patients or physicians to consider DBS only to improve or regain driving competence.
    Expert Review of Medical Devices 06/2014; 11(5):1-3. DOI:10.1586/17434440.2014.929495 · 1.78 Impact Factor


Available from
May 29, 2014