Questioning the utility of self‐efficacy measurements for Indians

International Journal of Research & Method in Education 07/2007; 30(2):193-206. DOI: 10.1080/17437270701383339


This study examined the influence of academic self‐efficacy and social support on the academic success of Indian‐American and Caucasian‐American undergraduate students. 200 Indian‐American and Caucasian‐American students completed a demographic form and five surveys. The data showed that academic self‐efficacy had a significant effect on college grade point averages (GPA) for Caucasians, but not for Indians. Regarding social support, the quality of mentoring relationships was found to be twice as high for Indians than Caucasians. The total number of mentors, however, was significantly higher for Caucasians. The results of this study support theories that highlight the importance of social support on Indians’ academic success, and of academic self‐efficacy on Caucasians’ academic success. This study also provides support of the existing literature that the construct of self‐efficacy is culturally biased, and questions the utility of self‐efficacy measurements for the Indian ethnicity.

4 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study utilizes a multilevel approach to investigate the relative impact of individual (psychological climate, occupational self-efficacy) and organizational (human resource development climate quality and climate strength) factors on employees’ work engagement. In addition, the study attempts to unfurl the mechanisms underlying the relationships among study variables by proposing and testing cross-level mediation and moderation hypotheses. Data were collected from a total of 375 employees nested within 30 different business organizations in India. Study hypotheses were tested using hierarchical linear modeling and bootstrapping techniques. Results of the study provide significant insights into dynamics of relationship among study variables. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    The Psychologist-Manager Journal 05/2014; 17(2):128. DOI:10.1037/mgr0000017
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine the cyberbullying sensitivity levels of high school students and their perceived social supports levels, and analyze the variables that predict cyberbullying sensitivity. In addition, whether cyberbullying sensitivity levels and social support levels differed according to gender was also investigated. While current communication technologies such as mobile phones, the Internet and social network sites provide new opportunities for learning and interaction, they may also pose a threat to personal security. The rapid increase in access to information and communication technologies by young people can also cause those technologies to be used for bullying their peers – called cyberbullying. Design/methodology/approach – In this study, the cyberbullying sensitivity levels of high school students and their perceived social support levels were determined, and some variables (perceived social support, gender and academic success) which predicted sensitivity related to cyberbullying were analyzed. A total of 433 students studying in a large public high school located at the middle part of Turkey voluntarily participated in this study. Findings – The findings of this research show that both the cyberbullying sensitivities of the students and their levels of the perceived social support were high and that both the cyberbullying sensitivities of the female students and their perceived social support levels were higher than the ones of the male students. Based on the result of stepwise regression analysis that investigate the predicting factors related to cyberbullying sensitivities of the students, perceived social support was found to be the strongest predicting factor. Originality/value – It can be seen that most young people have little information about cyberbullying and they lack information about basic e-security applications. Accordingly, most young people are victims or potential victims of cyberbullying. In conclusion, to remove victimhood due to cyberbullying or reduce it to a minimum from an optimistic point of view, not only risky processes but also how the environment should protect young people from developing incompatible behaviors and how to increase their sensitivity should be taken into consideration. It may be said that the findings that we obtained in our research may contribute to relevant studies from the point of developing preventive programs against cyberbullying.
    Interactive Technology and Smart Education 04/2015; 12(1):44-61. DOI:10.1108/ITSE-07-2014-0016


4 Reads