Article
Subendometrial microvascularization and uterine artery blood flow in IUD-induced side effects (levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device).
Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina: Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina, 90035-003 UFRGS, Brazil.
Contraception (impact factor:
2.72).
11/2008;
78(4):324-7.
DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.06.013
pp.324-7
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD versus copper IUD in control of dysmenorrhea, satisfaction and quality of life in women using IUD
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background: The levonorgestrel-releasing IUD can help the treatment of dysmenorrhea by reducing the synthesis of endometrial prostaglandins as a conventional treatment. Objective: This study was performed to assess the frequency of dysmenorrhea, satisfaction and quality of life in women using Mirena IUDs as compared to those using copper IUDs. Materials and Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed between 2006 and 2007 on 160 women aged between 20 to 35 years who attended Shahid Ayat Health Center of Tehran, and they were clients using IUDs for contraception. 80 individuals in group A received Mirena IUD and 80 individuals in group B received copper (380-A) IUD. Demographic data, assessment of dysmenorrhea, and follow-up 1, 3 and 6 months after IUD replacement were recorded in questionnaires designed for this purpose. To assess the quality of life, SF36 questionnaire was answered by the attending groups, and to assess satisfaction, a test with 3 questions was answered by clients. Results: Dysmenorrhea significantly was decreased in both groups six months after IUD insertion as compared to the first month (p<0.001). However, statistically, Mirena reduced dysmenorrhea faster and earlier compared to cupper IUD (p<0.003). There isn't any significant difference between these two groups in satisfaction and quality of life outcomes. Conclusion: There is no difference between these two groups in terms of the satisfaction and quality of life, therefor the usage of Mirena IUD is not a preferred contraception method.Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine 02/2012; 10:41-46. · 0.26 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
bleeding patterns
contraception use
endometrial vascularization
future therapeutic treatments
increased subendometrial blood flow
intrauterine device
IUD insertion
IUD type
IUD types
IUD)-induced side effects
IUD-induced side effects
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
pathophysiological changes
power Doppler analysis
prognostic factor
prospective clinical trial design
pulsatility index
severe dysmenorrhea
subendometrial microvascularization
uterine artery blood flow