Article

Demystifying Intuition: What It Is, What It Does, and How It Does It

Psychological Inquiry (Impact Factor: 6.65). 10/2010; 21:295-312. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2010.523875

ABSTRACT Definitions of intuition are discussed and two working definitions are proposed. This is followed by a list of eight unresolved problems concerning intuition. It is suggested that all of these problems can be resolved by cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST), a dual-process theory of personality according to which people process information with two systems, an experiential/intuitive system that is an associative learning system that humans share with other animals and a uniquely human verbal reasoning system. Intuition is considered to be a subsystem of the experiential/ intuitive system that operates by exactly the same principles and attributes but has narrower boundary conditions. The next section includes a presentation of the most relevant aspects of CEST with an emphasis on the operating rules and attributes of the experiential/intuitive system. This is followed by demonstrating how the operation of the experiential/intuitive system can resolve each of the unresolved problems concerning intuition. The article closes with a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the experiential/intuitive and rational/analytic systems. It is concluded that neither system is generally superior to the other, as each has important advantages and disadvantages.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
156 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major challenge for Dual Process Theories of reasoning is to predict the circumstances under which intuitive answers reached on the basis of Type 1 processing are kept or discarded in favour of analytic, Type 2 processing (Thompson 2009). We propose that a key determinant of the probability that Type 2 processes intervene is the affective response that accompanies Type 1 processing. This affective response arises from the fluency with which the initial answer is produced, such that fluently produced answers give rise to a strong feeling of rightness. This feeling of rightness, in turn, determines the extent and probability with which Type 2 processes will be engaged. Because many of the intuitions produced by Type 1 processes are fluent, it is common for them to be accompanied by a strong sense of rightness. However, because fluency is poorly calibrated to objective difficulty, confidently held intuitions may form the basis of poor quality decisions.
    Mind & Society 01/2012; 11(1).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationality in decision making is commonly assessed by comparing choice performance against normative standards. We argue that such a performance-centered approach blurs the distinction between rational choice and adaptive behavior. Instead, rational choice should be assessed with regard to the way individuals make analytic decisions. We suggest that analytic decisions can be made in two different modes in which control processes are directed at different levels. In a RUN mode, thought is directed at controlling the operation of a decision strategy. In the JUMP mode, the individual analyses the interpretation of the decision situation as well as the appropriateness of alternative strategies. We suggest that a decision should be considered “rational” when an individual is able to switch between these modes and balance their interaction.
    Mind & Society 01/2011; 11(1).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: • Eine empirische Untersuchung und Praxisbeispiele zeigen, dass Führungskräfte sowohl analytische als auch intuitive Entscheidungen treffen. • Ob sie sich auf Zahlen und Fakten oder auf ihre Intuition stützen, ist allerdings in hohem Maße von der Entscheidungssituation und dem jeweiligen Entscheidungsträger abhängig. • Da Intuition unbewusst ist, benötigen Führungskräfte insbesondere bei intuitiven Entscheidungen die Unterstützung durch das Controlling. • Die Aufgabe des Controllings ist dabei, Führungskräfte bei kontrollierbarem Risiko zu intuitiven Entscheidungen zu ermutigen und gleichzeitig Intuitionsdefekte aufzudecken und einzugrenzen. • Harte Fakten und Analysen sind für gute Unternehmensentscheidungen ebenso wichtig wie Intuition. • Je größer die Erfahrung und das Wissen der Führungskräfte, desto verlässlicher sind ihre intuitiven Entscheidungen. • Die besten Entscheidungen werden getroffen, wenn das Bauchgefühl durch Zahlen und Analysen bestätigt wird. • Das Controlling soll Führungskräfte situationsabhängig zu intuitiven Entscheidungen ermutigen und bei Selbstüberschätzung Intuition einbremsen.
    Controlling & Management Review. 06/2013; 57(3):14-22.

Full-text

View
4 Downloads
Available from
Jul 8, 2014