Article

Cortical Activations in Humans Grasp-Related Areas Depend on Hand Used and Handedness

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 02/2008; 3(10):e3388. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003388
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In non-human primates grasp-related sensorimotor transformations are accomplished in a circuit involving the anterior intraparietal sulcus (area AIP) and both the ventral and the dorsal sectors of the premotor cortex (vPMC and dPMC, respectively). Although a human homologue of such a circuit has been identified whether activity within this circuit varies depending on handedness has yet to be investigated.
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explicitly test how handedness modulates activity within human grasping-related brain areas. Right- and left-handers subjects were requested to reach towards and grasp an object with either the right or the left hand using a precision grip while scanned. A kinematic study was conducted with similar procedures as a behavioral counterpart for the fMRI experiment. Results from a factorial design revealed significant activity within the right dPMC, the right cerebellum and AIP bilaterally. The pattern of activity within these areas mirrored the results found for the behavioral study.
Data are discussed in terms of an handedness-independent role for the right dPMC in monitoring hand shaping, the need for bilateral AIP activity for the performance of precision grip movements which varies depending on handedness and the involvement of the cerebellum in terms of its connections with AIP. These results provide the first compelling evidence of specific grasping related neural activity depending on handedness.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Wolfgang Grodd, Jul 01, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
128 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sequencing of finger positions reflects a prototype of skilled behaviour. In order to perform sequencing, cognitive control supports the requirements and postural transitions. In this electroencephalography (EEG) study, we evaluate the effects of hand dominance and assess the neural correlates of unimanual and bimanual sequencing in left- and right-handers. The behavioural measurements provided an index of response planning (response time to first key press) and response execution (time between successive key presses, taps/s and percentage of correct responses), whereas the neural dynamics was determined by means of EEG coherence, expressing the functional connectivity between brain areas. Correlations between brain activity and behaviour were calculated for exploring the neural correlates that are functionally relevant for sequencing. Brain-behavioural correlations during response planning and execution revealed the significance of circuitry in the left hemisphere, underlining its significant role in the organisation of goal-directed behaviour. This lateralisation profile was independent of intrinsic constraints (hand dominance) and extrinsic demands (task requirements), suggesting essential higher-order computations in the left hemisphere. Overall, the observations highlight that the left hemisphere is specialised for sequential motor organisation in left- and right-handers, suggesting an endogenous hemispheric asymmetry for compound actions and the representation of skill; processes that can be separated from those that are involved in hand dominance. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Behavioural Brain Research 01/2015; 283. DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.021 · 3.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence from recent neurophysiological studies on non-human primates as well as from human behavioural studies suggest that actions with similar kinematic requirements but different end-state goals are supported by separate neural networks. It is unknown whether these different networks supporting seemingly similar reach-to-grasp actions are lateralized, or if they are equally represented in both hemispheres. Recently published behavioural evidence suggests certain networks are lateralized to the left hemisphere. Specifically, when participants used their right hands their maximum grip aperture (MGA) was smaller when grasping-to-eat food items than when grasping-to-place the same items. Left-handed movements showed no difference between tasks. The present study investigates whether the differences between grasp-to-eat and grasp-to-place actions are driven by an intent to eat, or if placing an item into the mouth (sans ingestion) is sufficient to produce asymmetries. Twelve right-handed adults were asked to reach-to-grasp food items to either a) eat them, b) place them in a bib, or c) place them between their lips, then toss/spit them into a nearby receptacle. Participants performed each task with large and small food items, using both their dominant and non-dominant hands. The current study replicated the previous finding of smaller MGAs for the eat condition during right-handed, but not left-handed grasps. MGAs in the eat and spit conditions did not significantly differ from each other, suggesting that eating and bringing a food item to the mouth both utilize similar motor plans, likely originating within the same neural network. Results are discussed in relation to neurophysiology and development.
    Journal of Neurophysiology 07/2014; 112(8). DOI:10.1152/jn.00295.2014 · 3.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine movement variability in the more-affected upper-extremity in chronic stroke survivors. We investigated two hypotheses: (1) individuals with stroke will have increased amount of variability and altered structure of variability in upper-extremity joint movement patterns as compared to age-matched controls; and (2) the degree of motor impairment and joint kinematics will be correlated with the temporal structure of variability. METHODS: Sixteen participants with chronic stroke and nine age-matched controls performed three trials of functional reach-to-grasp. The amount of variability was quantified by computing the standard deviation of shoulder, elbow, wrist and index finger flexion/extension joint angles. The temporal structure of variability was determined by calculating approximate entropy in shoulder, elbow, wrist and index finger flexion/extension joint angles. FINDINGS: Individuals with stroke demonstrated greater standard deviations and significantly reduced approximate entropy values as compared to controls. Furthermore, motor impairments and kinematics demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with temporal structure of variability. INTERPRETATION: Changes in the temporal structure of variability in upper-extremity joint angles suggest that movement patterns used by stroke survivors are less adaptable. This knowledge may yield additional insights into the impaired motor system and suggest better interventions that can enhance upper-extremity movement adaptability.
    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 01/2013; 28(2). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.11.006 · 1.88 Impact Factor

Similar Publications