Article

Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment.

Department of Medical Oncology and Center for Psycho-Oncology and Palliative Care Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 550 Shields Warren, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 11/2008; 300(14):1665-73. DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.14.1665
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Talking about death can be difficult. Without evidence that end-of-life discussions improve patient outcomes, physicians must balance their desire to honor patient autonomy against a concern of inflicting psychological harm.
To determine whether end-of-life discussions with physicians are associated with fewer aggressive interventions.
A US multisite, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers (n = 332 dyads), September 2002-February 2008. Patients were followed up from enrollment to death, a median of 4.4 months later. Bereaved caregivers' psychiatric illness and quality of life was assessed a median of 6.5 months later.
Aggressive medical care (eg, ventilation, resuscitation) and hospice in the final week of life. Secondary outcomes included patients' mental health and caregivers' bereavement adjustment.
One hundred twenty-three of 332 (37.0%) patients reported having end-of-life discussions before baseline. Such discussions were not associated with higher rates of major depressive disorder (8.3% vs 5.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-3.32), or more worry (mean McGill score, 6.5 vs 7.0; P = .19). After propensity-score weighted adjustment, end-of-life discussions were associated with lower rates of ventilation (1.6% vs 11.0%; adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83), resuscitation (0.8% vs 6.7%; adjusted OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.80), ICU admission (4.1% vs 12.4%; adjusted OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.90), and earlier hospice enrollment (65.6% vs 44.5%; adjusted OR, 1.65;95% CI, 1.04-2.63). In adjusted analyses, more aggressive medical care was associated with worse patient quality of life (6.4 vs 4.6; F = 3.61, P = .01) and higher risk of major depressive disorder in bereaved caregivers (adjusted OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.12-10.13), whereas longer hospice stays were associated with better patient quality of life (mean score, 5.6 vs 6.9; F = 3.70, P = .01). Better patient quality of life was associated with better caregiver quality of life at follow-up (beta = .20; P = .001).
End-of-life discussions are associated with less aggressive medical care near death and earlier hospice referrals. Aggressive care is associated with worse patient quality of life and worse bereavement adjustment.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Susan D Block, Jun 18, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
118 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Previous studies regarding patients' end of life (EOL) preparation have focused mainly on practical tasks, such as advance directives. In this study, we investigate the relational and personal aspects of EOL preparation, using a patient-completed questionnaire, and examine associations with clinician–patient communication (CPC) and other variables.Methods Patients with advanced cancer but with good performance status were recruited from 24 medical oncology clinics, to participate in a cluster-randomised controlled trial of early palliative care intervention. Measures included the Quality of Life at the End of Life preparation for EOL subscale, and measures of CPC, functional status, comorbidity, spiritual well-being and symptom severity. Using chi-squared tests, t-tests and multivariate regression analyses, we examined the variables associated with preparation for EOL. We also examined the frequency distributions of individual EOL preparation items and used logistic regression to examine their associations with adequacy of CPC.ResultsIn the 469 patients, characteristics associated with better EOL preparation were better CPC, older age, living alone, less symptom burden and better spiritual well-being. Thirty-one per cent agreed that they worried ‘quite a bit’ or ‘completely’ about their family's preparation to cope with the future, and 27% agreed that they would be a burden to their family. All preparation items except regrets about life were associated with adequacy of communication.ConclusionsA substantial minority of patients with advanced cancer but with good performance status are concerned about EOL preparation, particularly in relation to their families. Better CPC may help patients prepare not only practically but also personally and socially in relation to the dying process and the welfare of their families. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Psycho-Oncology 08/2012; 21(8). DOI:10.1002/pon.1995 · 4.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article provides an overview of quality of life (QOL) and end-of-life issues that pertain to older patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices. Most patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) enjoy similar QOL to that of other patients with cardiac diseases, especially in the absence of ICD shocks. Conventional pacemakers, as well as devices incorporating cardiac resynchronization, can improve QOL in appropriately selected patients regardless of age. In patients approaching the end of life, all devices, but especially ICDs, can adversely impact QOL in patients and families. All patients should have the opportunity to discuss the option of device deactivation.
    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 11/2012; 28(4):693-702. DOI:10.1016/j.cger.2012.07.005 · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To identify the attitudes, knowledge and practices regarding advance care planning (ACP) in palliative care. Methods A nationwide online survey was distributed to Australian palliative care services associated with the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (n=105). Seventy-three health professionals (HPs) and 59 service managers completed the survey. Results Regarding ACP, 51% of service managers reported relevant policies and procedures were in place in their service and 44% included ACP in job descriptions. Most HPs were confident in undertaking ACP, including initiating discussions with patients and complying with documents; however, only 44% reported receiving ACP specific training. Although 58% of HPs reported having conversations about ACP with more than 11 patients in the past 6 months, only 44% of managers report that it is offered to most patients. Thirty per cent of HPs were aware of others not adhering to patient wishes in the past 6 months and only 43% of HPs (and 37% of managers) believed ACP is done well within their service. Conclusions This first national survey examining ACP in palliative care services demonstrates there is a need to improve systems to support ACP and to understand circumstances in which ACP wishes are not followed. What is known about the topic? ACP is increasingly recognised as an important part of care of people in hospital and community settings. However, currently there is no empirical evidence about the national uptake and quality of ACP in palliative care settings specifically. What does this paper add? This nationwide survey shows improvements on past small-scale research showing that ACP is supported by palliative care health professionals; however, the organisational ACP processes and systems did not support best practice in this regard. What are the implications for practitioners? Palliative care organisations should incorporate ACP systems (including greater access to ACP policies and guidelines) that support health professionals to complete ACP with clients who want to. Greater access to support, such as ACP training and resources, would assist with development of ACP documentation and adherence.
    Australian health review: a publication of the Australian Hospital Association 01/2015; 39(2). DOI:10.1071/AH14118 · 1.00 Impact Factor