Exploring the reasons for delay in treatment of oral cancer.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif. 94143-0440, USA.
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) (Impact Factor: 2.24). 11/2008; 139(10):1346-52. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0046
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Oral cancer continues to be diagnosed and treated at a late stage, which has a negative effect on outcomes. This study identified and quantified delays in diagnosis and treatment.
The authors conducted a study that included all new patients seen in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, between 2003 and 2007 who had a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. They identified the time intervals for six stages, beginning with the time at which patients first became aware of symptoms and ending with the time at which definitive treatment began.
The total time from patients' first sign or symptoms to commencement of treatment was a mean of 205.9 days (range, 52-786 days). The longest delay was from the time symptoms first appeared to the initial visit to a health care professional (mean time, 104.7 days; range, 0-730 days).
Health care professionals need to place greater emphasis on patient education to encourage early self-referrals.
Patients should be encouraged to visit a health care professional when signs or symptoms of oral cancer first develop.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives The aim of the present study was to assess the levels of awareness, knowledge about signs and risk factors of mouth (oral) cancer, and attitudes towards early diagnosis and treatment among dental outpatients.Material and methodsA total of 1,200 adult outpatients attending dental clinics at the University of Jordan Hospital for dental examination and treatment were randomly selected to participate in the study. An 18-item pretested close-ended questionnaire was used for the study. Descriptive statistics were generated and chi-square tests, t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Spearman's rho test were used to examine differences between groups.ResultsOnly 45.6% of the subjects had heard about oral cancer. Some 66.9% and 33.8%, respectively, were able to correctly identify tobacco and alcohol as risk factors. Some 24.1% had no knowledge about any signs of oral cancer. Male subjects, smokers, alcohol drinkers, older participants (>40 years), and participants with less than a university education were significantly less aware, and had much less knowledge, of the signs and risk factors of oral cancer (P < 0.05).Conclusion Awareness about oral cancer among Jordanian dental outpatients is low. These dental patients, especially those in high-risk groups for mouth cancer and those of lower socio-economic status (SES), are less well informed about the signs and risk factors of oral cancer. Interventions to improve public knowledge about oral cancer and attitudes towards early diagnosis and treatment are urgently indicated.
    11/2014; DOI:10.1111/idj.12140
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stage of disease at the diagnosis of oral cancer is thought to be a significant factor in prognosis and outcome (International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, 2014). Unfortunately, we continue to diagnose almost 2/3 of these cancers at advanced stages of disease despite the ongoing research for devices/methods to aid the clinicians in detection and accurate oral mucosal lesion diagnosis. This paper explores both the nature of oral cancer and the adjuncts available for detection, and presents the current issues in diagnostic delays of oral cancer detection.
    Oral Oncology 09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.09.005 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to describe oral mucosal screening and referral attitudes of Australian oral health therapists (OHTs) and dental hygienists (DHs).
    International Journal of Dental Hygiene 08/2014; DOI:10.1111/idh.12103 · 0.68 Impact Factor

Zachary S Peacock