Article

Primary care for adults with physical disabilities: perceptions from consumer and provider focus groups.

Program in Geriatrics, University of California, 101 City Drive South, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 0.85). 11/2008; 40(9):645-51.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Family physicians lack data on how best to address the needs of adults with physical disabilities. We undertook this study to understand how consumers, educators, and other professionals perceive primary care for people with disabilities.
We conducted six focus groups, three with 27 health professionals in primary care practices affiliated with an urban university medical center and three with 19 local adults, ages 21-64 years, with physical disabilities. From transcribed recordings, three investigators conducted separate content analyses. Independent author reviews and participant review confirmed saturation and agreement for major themes.
All groups perceived that generalist physicians and other health professionals need more education about disability issues. Multiple barriers limit care, including physical access and transportation, funding, limitations in professionals' knowledge and attitudes, communication gaps, and health systems failures. Both consumers and professionals recommended reducing barriers by educating professionals and trainees about disabilities and resources, improving provider-patient communication, enhancing physical access (eg, high-low examination tables, wide automatic doors, high-contrast signs and lighting, wheelchair scales), and increasing appointment times.
Primary care must address the unmet needs of people with disabilities. Family medicine educators can begin by teaching learners how to coordinate care, access resources, and communicate about disability issues.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Laura Mosqueda, Dec 26, 2013
1 Follower
 · 
100 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is generally accepted that the therapeutic relationship between professionals and patients is one of trust. Nonetheless, some patient groups carry certain social vulnerabilities that can be exacerbated when they extend trust to health-care professionals. In exploring the epistemic and ethical implications of expert status, this paper examines how calls to trust may increase epistemic oppression and perpetuate the vulnerability of people with impairments. It critically evaluates the processes through which epistemic communities are formed or determined, and examines the institutional structure and power relations that contribute to or sustain such self-affirming ideological communities. It also argues for a two-way collaborative approach between professionals and people with impairments that recognizes the role of local knowledge in enhancing professionals' own understanding of their theoretical framework and promoting responsive practices and policies.
    International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10/2011; 4(2):102-123. DOI:10.1353/ijf.2011.0020
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The performances of maximum-ratio (MRC) and optimum diversity combining schemes in the presence of ISI due to cochannel interference (CCI) in flat Rayleigh fading channels are analyzed and compared. In flat fading environments, ISI can be generated by co-channel interferers due to the random symbol and phase offsets between the desired signal and the cochannel interferers. With these two random-valued offsets, the CCI is shown as a wide-sense stationary process (WSS) and then an optimal diversity can be applied. Several fading conditions experienced by desired and interfering signals are considered. The performance using the Gaussian interference model is also provided for comparison. An accurate error rate is obtained by using the moment method for each time-varying channel in Monte-Carlo simulations.
    Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004 IEEE 60th; 10/2004
  • Source
    Family medicine 11/2008; 40(9):665-7. · 0.85 Impact Factor