Your selected document
Y our selected document
This entry is our account of a study selected by Drug and Alcohol Findings as particularly relevant to improving
outcomes from drug or alcohol interventions in the UK. Unless indicated otherwise, permission is given to
distribute this entry or incorporate passages in other documents as long as the source is acknowledged
including the web address http://findings.org.uk. The original study was not published by Findings; click on the
Title to obtain copies. Free reprints may also be available from the authors – click Request reprint to send or
adapt the pre-prepared e-mail message. Links to source documents are in blue. Hover mouse over orange text
for explanatory notes. The Summary is intended to convey the findings and views expressed in the study. Below
are some comments from Drug and Alcohol Findings.
Click HERE and enter e-mail address to be alerted to new studies and review s
The effectiveness of supported employment in people w ith
Mueser K.T., Campbell K., Drake R.E. Request reprint
J ournal of Dual Diagnosis: 2011, 7( 1–2) , p. 90–102.
Compared to more gradualist approaches, with appropriate support targeted at rapidly
achieving this objective, far more mentally ill problem substance users in the USA were
enabled to find competitive employment in the open labour market rather than sheltered
Summary Controlled research has consistently demonstrated that supported
employment programmes, especially the Individual Placement and Support model, are
more effective at promoting employment than a range of other vocational rehabilitation
approaches such as group skills training, brokered vocational services, or transitional
employment programmes. However, it has not yet been established whether clients
suffering from both psychiatric and substance use problems also have better outcomes in
supported employment programmes. The featured analysis addressed this issue, drawing
on data from four randomised controlled trials of Individual Placement and Support.
All four studies recruited unemployed patients suffering from severe mental illness who
were attending mental health centres, and randomly allocated them to a newly
established Individual Placement and Support programme or to one or more well
established comparison vocational services. All the comparison services were highly
regarded, active programmes, considered at the time to be state-of-the-art. Generally
they shared an emphasis on stepwise entry into competitive employment and brokered
services in which the vocational programme was provided by a separate agency from the
mental health programme.
Importantly, none of the studies excluded clients on the basis of substance use disorders,
illness severity, lack of readiness, poor job history, or other clinical factors. Across the
four studies, about two thirds of the 1063 clients agreed to participate. A few were later
excluded or not followed up, leaving 681 patients in the studies. Of these, 106 'dual
diagnosis' patients also suffered currently or in the past six months from substance abuse
http://findings.org.uk/count/downloads/download.php?file=Mueser_KT_6.txt (1 of 4) [01/10/11 15:47:08]
Your selected document
or dependence, and formed the subgroup for the featured analysis. Typically they were
psychotic single black men around 40 years of age.
Over the 18 months after the studies started, the featured analysis assessed entry in to
competitive employment at prevailing wages in businesses independent of the
rehabilitation service and not provided as part of a rehabilitation package. It found that
on all the measures, the dual diagnosis participants in the studies had significantly better
employment outcomes after being allocated to an Individual Placement and Support
programme than to comparison services. More obtained competitive employment (60%
v. 24% ) and had worked 20 or more hours per week over the 18 months (47% v. 10% ).
On average per person they had also worked on more weeks (20 v. 13) and hours (607
v. 219) in total and earned more ($3050 v. $807) than comparison clients. When the
focus was narrowed to the clients in both groups who worked at some time during the 18
months, it remained the case that more clients allocated to Individual Placement and
Support had worked 20 or more hours per week (78% v. 43% ) and they had also found
their first job sooner (in 133 days v, 252). The other measures all favoured the Individual
Placement and Support clients but not to a statistically significant degree.
The authors' conclusions
Dually diagnosed clients randomly allocated to Individual Placement and Support had
significantly better competitive work outcomes than those offered comparison vocational
services. Despite engaging a greater range of clients in work, including some presumably
at the 'less ready' end of the readiness for work range, Individual Placement and Support
clients were also more likely to work at least half time and on average found a job much
sooner. Afforded the advantages conferred by Individual Placement and Support, the
overall work outcomes of these dually diagnosed clients were comparable to those of
mentally ill patients in general after being offered supported employment programmes.
These results underscore the importance of one of the principles of the approach – that
anyone who wants competitive work should be allowed to participate in supported
employment, regardless of any other challenges they experience, such as symptoms,
recent relapses, cognitive impairment, or substance abuse. There is no need to wait until
these problems have been resolved; in particular, sobriety is not a prerequisite for
benefiting from supported employment. The findings also suggest that supported
employment may be an important rehabilitation adjunct for many people with dual
diagnoses, aiding their recovery. Competitive employment and the income it brings with
it are also often valued outcomes in themselves for the patients and contribute to their
quality of life.
These impressive results suggest that given individualised and intensive
support geared to this objective, some of the most difficult to place patients can
successfully enter the labour market. They are a counter to over-pessimistic or over-
cautious concerns that such people can never be found normal employment, or not until
step by step they have resolved their problems and got used to working through
volunteering and sheltered employment.
The Individual Placement Support model was the one highlighted in a report on what
might work best in employment support for people with drug and alcohol problems in
http://findings.org.uk/count/downloads/download.php?file=Mueser_KT_6.txt (2 of 4) [01/10/11 15:47:08]
Your selected document
London based on experience in the city and international research with mentally ill
populations. The report said the approach has been found more successful in placing
participants into competitive employment than the traditional 'train and place' approach,
where an individual has a long period of vocational training and voluntary work
experience before attempting to access paid work. In contrast, the Individual Placement
Support model involves rapid job search and minimal pre-vocational training. The
Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health also chose the approach as the most effective method
of helping people with severe mental health problems achieve sustainable competitive
employment and in 2009 declared itself committed to "supporting the implementation of
Individual Placement and Support (IPS) in the UK".
The approach is described as embodying the following key principles:
• It aims to get people into competitive employment.
• It is open to all who want a job.
• It tries to find jobs consistent with people's preferences.
• Job search is rapid.
• Employment specialists are located in clinical teams.
• It provides time-unlimited, individualised support for both employer and employee.
• Welfare benefits counselling is included.
Now the featured analysis has confirmed that in the US context the approach truly is
superior to well established alternatives for problem substance users with severe mental
illness. It should however be remembered that the analysis was not concerned with
employment or productive occupation as such, but with employment closely defined to be
the kind Individual Placement and Support services target. In the four studies which fed
data in to the analysis, sometimes alternative schemes sometimes achieved as high a
rate of employment, but of a different kind. Neither is it necessarily the case that
increased competitive employment rates associated with Individual Placement and
Support also mean this approach leads to greater improvements in functioning and
symptoms and greater job satisfaction, and while clearly applicable to a substantial
proportion of patients, the studies do not provide support for using the approach for
people unwilling to try the open labour market or who are unable to sustain engagement
with psychiatric rehabilitation services. Details below.
In one study Individual Placement and Support was compared against a more traditional approach which placed
severely mentally ill patients in a range of vocational options based on their readiness for work, including
businesses run by or contracted by rehabilitation agencies offering protected employment, and sometimes the
patient-employees were supervised by rehabilitation agency staff. In this study there was the expected
advantage for Individual Placement and Support in helping patients find competitive employment (75% v. 34% )
but the proportions attaining any kind of paid employment were roughly the same at 80% and 75%
respectively. The reason was that the alternative approach placed many more patients in forms of protected
employment run by the rehabilitation agency. In another similar study, 45% of Individual Placement and
Support patients obtained competitive employment but just 8% sheltered employment; for patients offered
alternative vocational services the situation was almost exactly reversed, with just 7% finding competitive
employment but 54% sheltered employment.
Neither is it necessarily the case that increased competitive employment rates associated with Individual
Placement and Support also mean this approach leads to greater improvements in functioning and symptoms
and greater job satisfaction. In one study, generally patients in the two groups were equally satisfied with their
jobs. As well as job satisfaction, other studies (1 2 3) have found that improvements in global functioning,
http://findings.org.uk/count/downloads/download.php?file=Mueser_KT_6.txt (3 of 4) [01/10/11 15:47:09]
Your selected document
quality of life, self-esteem, and psychiatric symptoms did not significantly differ. This finding of equivalence
does however mean that there were no widespread negative psychological consequences of these vulnerable
patients being encouraged to rapidly try competitive employment.
It is also the case that participants in the studies were self-selected as willing and able to join a programme
which might (depending on their random allocation) seek to rapidly insert them in to the competitive labour
market. In two studies (1 2) this was half the patients admitted to the rehabilitation services. Also it is unclear
from the featured report just how severe were the patients' substance use problems; at a minimum they met
the equivalent of standard US criteria for 'abuse' but – especially in a mentally ill population – this need not be
indicative of a problem severely limiting ability to benefit from an employment programme. The four studies
also demonstrate that it can take a year for an Individual Placement and Support service to find its feet and
that it is not always successfully implemented.
The most recently published of the four studies amalgamated in the featured analysis recruited patients
between 1999 and 2002. It must be open to question whether in labour market conditions in Britain today, any
approach will be able to make a big difference to the chances of severely mentally and drug or alcohol
dependent patients finding normal paid employment.
Thanks for their comments on this entry in draft to Kim Mueser of the Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center in
Concord, USA. Commentators bear no responsibility for the text including the interpretations and any remaining
Last revised 26 September 2011
Comment on this entry• Give us your feedback on the site (one-minute survey)
Top 10 most closely related documents on this site. For more try a subject or
free text search
A practical clinical trial of coordinated care management to treat substance use disorders among public
assistance beneficiaries STUDY 2009
Evaluation of the Jobcentre Plus Intensive Activity trial for substance misusing customers STUDY 2011
Improving 24-month abstinence and employment outcomes for substance-dependent women receiving
Temporary Assistance For Needy Families with intensive case management STUDY 2009
Toward cost-effective initial care for substance-abusing homeless STUDY 2008
Long-term outcomes of office-based buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance therapy STUDY 2010
Population estimates of alcohol misusers who access DWP benefits STUDY 2010
Problem drug users' experiences of employment and the benefit system STUDY 2010
Alcohol misusers' experiences of employment and the benefit system STUDY 2010
Dual diagnosis add-on to mental health services improves outcomes STUDY 2004
Self-financing resident-run houses maintain recovery after treatment STUDY 2008
http://findings.org.uk/count/downloads/download.php?file=Mueser_KT_6.txt (4 of 4) [01/10/11 15:47:09]