Timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis

College of Medicine-Jeddah, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and Department of OB/GYN, King Abdulaziz Medical City-WR, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Impact Factor: 3.45). 11/2012; 120(6). DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12036
Source: PubMed


Prophylactic antibiotics reduce infectious morbidity from caesarean section. The timing of their administration, however, is a matter of controversy.
To examine maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity in women receiving preoperative prophylaxis compared with those receiving intraoperative administration.
Medline, Embase, Current Controlled Trials and Cochrane Central were searched from their inception dates to December 2011.
Randomised controlled trials of a single dose of any antibiotic comparing preoperative with intraoperative administration were selected.
Trial characteristics, outcomes and quality measures, based on the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, were independently extracted. The random effect model of DerSimonian and Laird to estimate relative risks (RRs) for maternal and neonatal outcomes was used.
Six trials met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 2313 women and 2345 newborns. Preoperative administration was associated with a significant 41% reduction in the rate of endometritis compared with intraoperative administration (RR 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.37–0.94; I2 0%). In the preoperative group, there were nonsignificant reductions in the rates of wound infection (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44–1.14; I2 0%), maternal febrile morbidity (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.46–1.95; I2 0%), neonatal sepsis (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.47–1.41; I2 0%), neonatal septic work-up (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.71–1.21; I2 0%) and neonatal intensive-care unit admission (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.65–1.28; I2 0%). There were nonsignificant increases in the rates of maternal pyelonephritis (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.49–2.43; I2 0%) and neonatal pneumonia (RR 3.36; 95% CI 0.55–20.47; I2 0%).
Compared with intraoperative administration, preoperative antibiotics significantly reduce the rate of endometritis. The lack of neonatal adverse effects should be cautiously interpreted given the limited power of the trials to detect such effects.


Available from: Hassan Said Ba'aqeel
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria received antibiotics 30-60 minutes before skin incision while others received antibiotics after umbilical cords clamping. For the meta-analysis, studies were identified from the database of PUBMED, Cochrane Library and EMbase and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Four hundred and ten patients were randomized to receive antibiotics before skin incision (n = 205) or after umbilical cords clamping (n = 205). There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), wound infection (RR = 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.69) and total puerperal morbidity (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.22). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), septic workup (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.26) was observed. The meta-analysis involving nine RCTs showed that no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the risk of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.39, 1.36), wound infection (RR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.55, 1.17), or puerperal morbidity (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.70, 1.13). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.20), septic workup (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.54), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.18) was observed. For elective caesarean delivery, the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and after umbilical cord clamping were equal. Both antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and that after umbilical cord clamping were recommended for elective caesarean delivery. The outcome of further studies should address both maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity as well as long-term neonatal follow up. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-11001853.
    PLoS ONE 07/2015; 10(7):e0129434. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0129434 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, the purpose is to arrange information to understand at one view. The proposed summarization frame technology is a system to hierarchically arrange and classify information by targeting content and level of importance in sentences. Moreover, the technique in which the Concept Base, the Degree of Association Algorithm, the Time Judgment system and the Place judgment system are used to understand content of sentences is proposed. The Concept Base generates semantics from a certain word, and the Degree of Association Algorithm uses the results of the semantics expansion to express the relationship between one word and another as a numeric value. Only needed information like the number of strokes limitation etc. can be easily extracted by hierarchically arranging information in the document summary. Moreover, the speed-up of the retrieval can be expected by narrowing the retrieval object in information retrieval. An answer matched to TPO can be expected to be achieved in a QA system. Sentences are classified according to the content. Each classification is classified into a more detailed field. Important keywords are extracted from the sentences classified into the field. Moreover, the extracted keywords are classified into common and peculiar word for the sentences in the field. In addition, sentences of each field hierarchize sentences to three stages according to the importance of the content. In addition, the sentences of each field are hierarchized at three levels according to the importance of the content.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sepsis is a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. In the UK, sepsis is now the leading cause of direct maternal deaths. Raising awareness among healthcare professionals about the risks of maternal sepsis and the importance of early management is urgently needed. The challenge in the management of maternal sepsis is the translation of the vast knowledge gained from sequential confidential enquiries into maternal death and research findings, into clinical practice, to ensure an improvement in patient quality of care and maternal mortality and morbidity. In this chapter, I give an overview of the management of the risks of sepsis, and discuss implementation strategies that may reduce these risks.
    Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 04/2013; 27(4). DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.04.003 · 1.92 Impact Factor
Show more