Acute enhancement of lower-extremity dynamic strength and flexibility with whole-body vibration.

Exercise Science and Health Promotion Department, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, Florida, USA.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (Impact Factor: 1.86). 10/2008; 23(1):51-7. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181839f19
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this investigation was to examine the acute effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) on muscular strength, flexibility, and heart rate (HR). Twenty adults (10 men, 10 women) untrained to WBV participated in the study. All subjects completed assessment of lower-extremity isokinetic torque, flexibility, and HR immediately before and after 6 minutes of WBV and 6 minutes of leg cycling ergometry (CYL), in randomized order. During WBV, subjects stood upright on a vibration platform for a total of 6 minutes. Vibration frequency was gradually increased during the first minute to a frequency of 26 Hz, which was maintained for the remaining 5 minutes. During CYL, power output was gradually increased to 50 W during the first minute and maintained at that power output for the remaining 5 minutes. Lower-extremity flexibility was determined using the sit-and-reach box test. Peak and average isokinetic torque of knee extension and flexion were measured by means of a motor-driven dynamometer with velocity fixed at 120 degrees .s. Change scores for the outcome measures were compared between treatments using Student's paired t-tests. Analysis revealed significantly greater HR acceleration with CYL (24.7 bpm) than after WBV (15.8 bpm). The increase of sit-and-reach scores after WBV (4.7 cm) was statistically greater (p < 0.05) than after CYL (0.8 cm). After WBV, increases in peak and average isokinetic torque of knee extension, 7.7% and 9.6%, were statistically greater than after CYL (p < 0.05). Average torque of knee flexion also increased more with WBV (+7.8%) than with CYL (-1.5%) (p < 0.05). The findings of this study indicate that short-term WBV standing elicits acute enhancements of lower-extremity muscular torque and flexibility, suggesting the application of this technology as a preparatory activity before more intense exercise.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vibration is a mechanical phenomenon whereby oscillations occur about an equilibrium point.Vibration platform uses machine, control system and information technologies to optimize human performance. In order to explore the mechanical effect of vibration based on machines and control systems on human performance, twenty participants were voluntarily involved in this trial. The findings of this study indicated that automation vibration has significant difference on human performance. It has a positive effect on human body. Therefore, vibration can be used in auto regulation.
    10/2013; 443:281-284. DOI:10.4028/
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vibration exercise (VbX) has gained popularity as a warm-up modality to enhance performance in golf, baseball and sprint cycling but little is known about the efficacy of using VbX as a warm-up prior to resistance exercise, such as deadlifting. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a deadlift (DL) specific warm-up, VbX warm-up and Control on DL power output. The DL warm-up included 10, 8, and 5 repetitions performed at 30%, 40%, and 50% 1 repetition maximum (RM), respectively, where the number of repetitions was matched by body weight squats performed with vibration and without vibration (Control). The warm-up conditions were randomised and performed at least 2 days apart. Peak power, mean power, rate of force development, and electromyography (EMG) were measured during the concentric phase of two consecutive deadlifts (75% 1 RM) at 30 s and 2:30 min following the warm-up conditions. There was no significant (p > 0.05) main effect or interaction effect between the DL warm-up, VbX warm-up and Control for peak power, mean power, rate of force development, and EMG. VbX warm-up did not exhibit an ergogenic effect to potentiate muscle activity more than the specific deadlift warm-up and Control. Therefore, DL PO is affected to a similar extent, irrespective of the type of stimuli, when the warm-up is not focused on raising muscle temperature.
    The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 10/2014; 29(4). DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000738 · 1.86 Impact Factor