Article

Anatomic MR Imaging and Functional Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Peripheral Nerve Tumors and Tumorlike Conditions

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, and Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
American Journal of Neuroradiology (Impact Factor: 3.68). 11/2012; 34(4). DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3316
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:A number of benign and malignant peripheral nerve tumor and tumorlike conditions produce similar imaging features on conventional anatomic MR imaging. Functional MR imaging using DTI can increment the diagnostic performance in differentiation of these lesions. Our aim was to evaluate the role of 3T anatomic MR imaging and DTI in the characterization of peripheral nerve tumor and tumorlike conditions.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-nine patients (13 men, 16 women; mean age, 41 ± 18 years; range, 11-83 years) with a nerve tumor or tumorlike condition (25 benign, 5 malignant) underwent 3T MR imaging by using anatomic (n = 29), functional diffusion, DWI (n = 21), and DTI (n = 24) techniques. Images were evaluated for image quality (3-point scale), ADC of the lesion, tractography, and fractional anisotropy of nerves with interobserver reliability in ADC and FA measurements.RESULTS:No significant differences were observed in age (benign, 40 ± 18 versus malignant, 45 ± 19 years) and sex (benign, male/female = 12:12 versus malignant, male/female = 3:2) (P > .05). All anatomic (29/29, 100%) MR imaging studies received "good" quality; 20/21 (95%) DWI and 21/24 (79%) DTI studies received "good" quality. ADC of benign lesions (1.848 ± 0.40 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) differed from that of malignant lesions (0.900 ± 0.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P < .001) with excellent interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.988 [95% CI, 0.976-0.994]). There were no FA or ADC differences between men and women (P > .05). FA of involved nerves was lower than that in contralateral healthy nerves (P < .001) with excellent interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.970 [95% CI, 0.946-0.991]). ADC on DTI and DWI was not statistically different (P > .05), with excellent intermethod reliability (ICC = 0.943 [95% CI, 0.836-0.980]). Tractography differences were observed in benign and malignant lesions.CONCLUSIONS:3T MR imaging and DTI are valuable methods for anatomic and functional evaluation of peripheral nerve lesions with excellent interobserver reliability. While tractography and low FA provide insight into neural integrity, low diffusivity values indicate malignancy in neural masses.

Full-text

Available from: Majid Chalian, Feb 15, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
2,714 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography is useful for isolating white matter (WM) trajectories and exploring microstructural integrity. Tractography can be performed on atypical brain anatomy when landmarks are malformed or displaced but has been criticized for its subjectivity even when investigators have advanced anatomical knowledge. Also, little is known about the variability and reliability of tractography as a tool for assessing white matter damage in clinical populations such as children with pediatric epilepsy. Methods Children diagnosed with epilepsy [N = 43, mean age = 11.7 years, standard deviation = 3.7 years, 53% male] underwent a DTI sequence (6 directions, 2 × 2 × 3 mm voxels). Tractography for six white matter tracts (anterior forceps, fornices, bilateral arcuate fasciculi, and bilateral anterior cingula) was conducted twice by two experienced tractographers. Percent coefficient of variation (CV; for measuring variability) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; for measuring reliability) were calculated for tract volume and diffusion variables (fractional anisotropy [FA], mean diffusivity [MD], axial diffusivity [AD] and radial diffusivity [RD]). Results Diffusion variables showed low variability (CV = 2.7–8.8%) and very high reliability (ICC = .97–.99) except for limbic tracts [fornix (ICC = .75–.94); cingulum (ICC = .71–.98)]. Tract volume measurements showed high variability (CV = 21.9–62.0%) and moderate reliability (ICC = .54–.99). Overall, tract volume measurements were much more variable and less reliable than diffusion characteristics. Limbic structures showed more variability compared with others. Conclusions This suggests that DTI tractography and resulting diffusivity variables can reliably inform on the integrity of WM structures in a clinical sample with pediatric epilepsy and highlights the importance of reporting reliability information in studies that aim to answer clinical questions about WM integrity.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 08/2014; 37:116–122. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.06.020 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Seddon and Sunderland classifications have been used by physicians for peripheral nerve injury grading and treatment. While Seddon classification is simpler to follow and more relevant to electrophysiologists, the Sunderland grading is more often used by surgeons to decide when and how to intervene. With increasing availability of high-resolution and high soft-tissue contrast imaging provided by MR neurography, the surgical treatment can be guided following the above-described grading systems. The article discusses peripheral nerve anatomy, pathophysiology of nerve injury, traditional grading systems for classifying the severity of nerve injury, and the role of MR neurography in this domain, with respective clinical and surgical correlations, as one follows the anatomic paths of various nerve injury grading systems.
    Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 07/2014; 24(3):217-24. DOI:10.4103/0971-3026.137025
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors report an unusual case of ulnar neuropathy caused by granular cell tumor. The report describes the anatomic 3 Tesla MR Neurography and functional diffusion tensor findings of the case, which was subsequently confirmed on surgical excision and histopathology.
    Journal of Radiology Case Reports 06/2014; 8(6):11-7. DOI:10.3941/jrcr.v8i6.1664