Native anterior cruciate ligament obliquity versus anterior cruciate ligament graft obliquity: an observational study using navigated measurements.

Shoulder and Sports Medicine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.7). 10/2008; 37(1):114-9. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508323257
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The goal of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is to attain a graft that closely resembles the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy. By reconstructing the original anatomy, one hopes to eliminate issues related to graft elongation, impingement, and excessive tension while achieving ideal knee kinematics.
Clinical grafts placed using the transtibial technique will differ in the sagittal and coronal planes when compared with obliquity of the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament.
Controlled laboratory study/case series; Level of evidence, 4.
With the assistance of computer navigation, our study compared the anterior cruciate ligament orientation of 5 cadaver knees with 12 clinical anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees using the transtibial technique. Results: Clinical graft obliquity differed from the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament in all flexion angles: 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees. In the sagittal plane, the clinical graft obliquity differed from the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament by 13.6 degrees, 12.7 degrees, 16.7 degrees, and 17 degrees, respectively. In the coronal plane, the clinical graft obliquity differed from the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament by 4.9 degrees, 7.6 degrees, 8.9 degrees, and 12.7 degrees, respectively. Paired t tests demonstrated that the difference between the clinical and anatomic anterior cruciate ligament was significant (P <.05), except in the coronal plane at 0 degrees of flexion. In spite of this, all patients demonstrated a negative pivot shift and Lachman at the conclusion of their reconstructions and at 6-month follow-up.
The sagittal and coronal plane obliquity of well-functioning grafts placed using the transtibial technique were more vertical than anatomic fibers.
Graft obliquity, in both the coronal and sagittal plane, may be an important means to target appropriate anterior cruciate ligament graft position and can be monitored using surgical navigation systems.


Available from: Fatima Cody Stanford, May 04, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using 3-dimensional high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we sought to compare femoral and tibial tunnel position and resultant graft obliquity with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using transtibial (TT) or anteromedial (AM) portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques. Thirty patients were prospectively enrolled after primary, autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction by 2 groups of high-volume, fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons. With the TT technique, an external starting point was used to maximize graft obliquity and femoral footprint capture. By use of high-resolution MRI and imaging analysis software, bilateral 3-dimensional knee models were created, mirrored, and superimposed. Differences between centroids for each femoral and tibial insertion, as well as corresponding ACL/graft obliquity, were evaluated with paired t tests and 2-sided Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests, with P < .05 defined as significant. No significant differences were observed between groups in position of reconstructed femoral footprints. However, on the tibial side, AM centroids averaged 0.8 ± 1.9 mm anterior to native ACL centroids, whereas the TT group centered 5.23 ± 2.4 mm posterior to native ACL centroids (P < .001). Sagittal obliquity was closely restored with the AM technique (mean, 52.2° v. 53.5° for native ACL) but was significantly more vertical (mean, 66.9°) (P = .0001) for the TT group. In this clinical series, AM portal femoral tunnel reaming more accurately restored native ACL anatomy than the TT technique. Although both techniques can capture the native femoral footprint with similar accuracy, the TT technique requires significantly greater posterior placement of the tibial tunnel, resulting in decreased sagittal graft obliquity. When a tibial tunnel is drilled without the need to accommodate subsequent femoral tunnel reaming, more accurate tibial tunnel position and resultant sagittal graft obliquity are achieved. Level III, retrospective comparative study.
    Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 09/2011; 27(11):1511-22. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.007 · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the end-to-end distance changes in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) fibers during flexion/extension and internal/external rotation of the knee. The positional relation between the femur and tibia of 10 knees was digitized on a robotic system during flexion/extension and with an internal/external rotational torque (5 Nm). The ACL insertion site data, acquired by 3-dimensional scanning, were superimposed on the positional data. The end-to-end distances of 5 representative points on the femoral and tibial insertion sites of the ACL were calculated. The end-to-end distances of all representative points except the most anterior points were longest at full extension and shortest at 90°. The distances of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles were 37.2 ± 2.1 mm and 27.5 ± 2.8 mm, respectively, at full extension and 34.7 ± 2.4 mm and 20.7 ± 2.3 mm, respectively, at 90°. Only 4 knees had an isometric point, which was 1 of the 3 anterior points. Under an internal torque, both bundles became longer with statistical meaning at all flexion angles (P = .005). The end-to-end distances of all points became longest with internal torque at full extension and shortest with an external torque at 90°. Only 4 of 10 specimens had an isometric point at a variable anterior point. The end-to-end distances of the AM and PL bundles were longer in extension and shorter in flexion. The nonisometric tendency of the ACL and the end-to-end distance change during knee flexion/extension and internal/external rotation should be considered during ACL reconstruction to avoid overconstraint of the graft.
    Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 06/2012; 28(10):1524-32. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.004 · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effect of coronal- and sagittal-plane anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft obliquity on tibial rotation (TR) range of motion (ROM) during dynamic pivoting activities after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. We evaluated 19 ACL-reconstructed patients (mean age, 29 years; age range, 18 to 38 years; mean time interval postoperatively, 19.9 months) and 19 matched control subjects (mean age, 30.6 years; age range, 24 to 37 years) using motion analysis during (1) descending a stairway and pivoting and (2) landing from a jump and pivoting. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the coronal and sagittal ACL graft angle. The dependent variables were TR ROM during pivoting and the side-to-side difference (SSD) in TR ROM between the reconstructed knee and the contralateral intact knee. TR ROM of the ACL-reconstructed knee was significantly increased compared with both the contralateral intact knee and the healthy control knee (P < .05). A significant positive correlation was observed between TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.727, P = .0006 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.795, P = .0001 for landing and pivoting) as well as between SSD of TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.789, P < .0001 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.799, P < .0001 for landing and pivoting). No correlation was found with the sagittal ACL graft angle. After ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft, patients' knees showed higher TR values than their uninjured knees and the knees of uninjured control volunteers during dynamic pivoting activities. The findings of this study show that TR was better restored in ACL-reconstructed patients with a more oblique graft in the coronal plane. A similar relation was not observed for graft orientation in the sagittal plane. Although these data do not imply a cause-and-effect relation between the 2 variables, they may indicate that a more oblique placement of a single BPTB ACL graft in the coronal plane is correlated with better control of TR. Level IV, case series.
    Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 11/2011; 28(2):234-46. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.285 · 3.19 Impact Factor