The pathogen protein EspFU hijacks actin polymerization using mimicry and multivalency

Graduate Program in Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University of California, San Francisco, 600 16th Street, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Nature (Impact Factor: 42.35). 07/2008; 454(7207):1005-1008. DOI: 10.1038/nature07170

ABSTRACT Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli attaches to the intestine through actin pedestals that are formed when the bacterium injects its protein EspFU ( also known as TccP) into host cells(1). EspFU potently activates the host WASP ( Wiskott - Aldrich syndrome protein) family of actin- nucleating factors, which are normally activated by the GTPase CDC42, among other signalling molecules. Apart from its amino- terminal type III secretion signal, EspFU consists of five- and- a- half 47- amino- acid repeats. Here we show that a 17- residue motif within this EspFU repeat is sufficient for interaction with N- WASP ( also known as WASL). Unlike most pathogen proteins that interface with the cytoskeletal machinery, this motif does not mimic natural upstream activators: instead of mimicking an activated state of CDC42, EspFU mimics an auto-nhibitory element found within N- WASP. Thus, EspFU activates N- WASP by competitively disrupting the autoinhibited state. By mimicking an internal regulatory element and not the natural activator, EspFU selectively activates only a precise subset of CDC42- activated processes. Although one repeat is able to stimulate actin polymerization, we show that multiple- repeat fragments have notably increased potency. The activities of these EspFU fragments correlate with their ability to coordinate activation of at least two N- WASP proteins. Thus, this pathogen has used a simple autoinhibitory fragment as a component to build a highly effective actin polymerization machine.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are fundamental units of protein function and regulation. Despite their inability to form a unique stable tertiary structure in isolation, many IDRs adopt a defined conformation upon binding and achieve their function through their interactions with other biomolecules. However, this requirement for IDR functionality seems to be at odds with the high entropic cost they must incur upon binding an interaction partner. How is this seeming paradox resolved? While increasing the enthalpy of binding is one approach to compensate for this entropic cost, growing evidence suggests that inherent features of IDRs, for instance repeating linear motifs, minimise the entropic cost of binding. Moreover, this control of entropic cost can be carefully modulated by a range of regulatory mechanisms, such as alternative splicing and post-translational modifications, which enable allosteric communication and rheostat-like tuning of IDR function. In that sense, the high entropic cost of IDR binding can be advantageous by providing tunability to protein function. In addition to biological regulatory mechanisms, modulation of entropy can also be controlled by environmental factors, such as changes in temperature, redox-potential and pH. These principles are extensively exploited by a number of organisms, including pathogens. They can also be utilised in bioengineering, synthetic biology and in pharmaceutical applications such as increasing bioavailability of protein therapeutics.
    Current Opinion in Structural Biology 01/2014; 26:62–72. · 8.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The traditional structure to function paradigm conceives of a protein's function as emerging from its structure. In recent years, it has been established that unstructured, intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins are equally crucial elements for protein function, regulation and homeostasis. In this review, we provide a brief overview of how IDRs can perform similar functions to structured proteins, focusing especially on the formation of protein complexes and assemblies and the mediation of regulated conformational changes. In addition to highlighting instances of such functional equivalence, we explain how differences in the biological and physicochemical properties of IDRs allow them to expand the functional and regulatory repertoire of proteins. We also discuss studies that provide insights into how mutations within functional regions of IDRs can lead to human diseases. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. © 2015 The Protein Society.
    Protein Science 03/2015; 24(6). DOI:10.1002/pro.2674 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are enriched in signaling and regulatory functions because disordered segments permit interaction with several proteins and hence the re-use of the same protein in multiple pathways. Understanding IDP regulation is important because altered expression of IDPs is associated with many diseases. Recent studies show that IDPs are tightly regulated and that dosage-sensitive genes encode proteins with disordered segments. The tight regulation of IDPs may contribute to signaling fidelity by ensuring that IDPs are available in appropriate amounts and not present longer than needed. The altered availability of IDPs may result in sequestration of proteins through non-functional interactions involving disordered segments (i.e., molecular titration), thereby causing an imbalance in signaling pathways. We discuss the regulation of IDPs, address implications for signaling, disease and drug development, and outline directions for future research.
    Current Opinion in Structural Biology 06/2011; 21(3):432-40. DOI:10.1016/ · 8.75 Impact Factor