Article

Comparing Trends in BMI and Waist Circumference

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 4.39). 06/2010; 19(1):216-219. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.149

ABSTRACT The nature of excess body weight may be changing over time to one of greater central adiposity. The aim of this study is to determine whether BMI and waist circumference (WC) are increasing proportionately among population subgroups and the range of bodyweight, and to examine the public health implications of the findings. Our data are from two cross-sectional surveys (the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Studies (NHANES) in 1988–1994 (NHANES III) and 2005–2006), from which we have used samples of 15,349 and 4,176 participants aged ≥20 years. Between 1988–1994 and 2005–2006 BMI increased by an average of 1.8 kg/m2 and WC by 4.7 cm (adjusted for sex, age, race-ethnicity, and education). The increase in WC was more than could be attributed simply to increases in BMI. This independent increase in WC (of on average, 0.9 cm) was consistent across the different BMI categories, sexes, education levels, and race-ethnicity groups. It occurred in younger but not older age groups. Overall in each BMI category, the prevalence of low-risk WC decreased and the prevalence of increased-risk or substantially increased-risk WC increased. These results suggest that the adverse health consequences associated with obesity may be increasingly underestimated by trends in BMI alone. Since WC is closely linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, it is important to know the prevailing trends in both of these parameters.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Anna Peeters, Aug 21, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
269 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Besides measuring blood pressure and glucose levels, assessing the lipid spectrum is the method most commonly used to identify individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), as well as those who are likely to benefit most from lipid-lowering therapy. Although lowering LDL-cholesterol levels is the primary target of therapy in most clinical guidelines, accumulating evidence indicates that other lipoprotein-lipid measurements could provide a predictive value over and above that of LDL-cholesterol levels. For example, individuals treated with statins who achieve low LDL-cholesterol levels, but have high concentrations of either non-HDL cholesterol or apolipoprotein (apo) B, remain at increased cardiovascular risk. Similarly, individuals with low levels of either HDL cholesterol or apo A-I are also likely to experience cardiovascular events, despite having normal LDL-cholesterol levels. The residual cardiovascular risk, beyond that characterized by LDL-cholesterol levels alone, is exacerbated by physical inactivity and abdominal obesity, which are both increasingly prevalent risk factors for CVD. In this Review, we discuss the measurement of various lipoprotein-lipid parameters for the prediction of CVD risk, and their importance in identifying those patients who are likely to benefit from lipid-lowering therapy. The impact of recent studies on clinical guidelines is also considered.
    Nature Reviews Cardiology 02/2011; 8(4):197-206. DOI:10.1038/nrcardio.2010.223 · 10.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rising prevalence of generalized obesity is well documented, but less is known about trends in abdominal obesity. Levels of abdominal obesity and overweight are reported for adults in the Health Survey for England (HSE) by survey year and age for 1993-2008. HSE is a nationally representative cross-sectional population survey using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and measurement of waist circumference (WC) by nurse, allowing calculation of abdominal overweight and obesity (≥94 cm and ≥102 cm in men, and ≥80 cm and ≥88 cm in women). A total of 40,001 men and 46,397 women aged 18-67 provided data on WC in this period. Between 1993 and 2008 abdominal overweight rose from 44.9% to 62.3% in men, and from 46.6% to 66.8% in women, while abdominal obesity rose from 19.2% to 35.7% in men, and from 23.8% to 43.9% women. However, the rates of increase over time in England appear to be slowing down: curves with a less than linear increase each year were a better fit to the data than a linear trend. There was some variation across the age range in the time trend in abdominal obesity and overweight, in that the absolute increases over time were slightly less for younger adults.
    Obesity 05/2011; 20(8):1750-2. DOI:10.1038/oby.2011.127 · 4.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A number of studies have compared proportional increases over time in waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI). However this method is flawed. Here, we explain why comparisons of WC and BMI must take into account the relationship between them. We used data from two cross-sectional US surveys (NHANES 1988-94 and 2005-06), and calculated the percentage change in the average BMI and the average WC between the two surveys, comparing the results with a regression analysis of changes in WC relative to BMI. The crude percentage change in BMI (5.8%) was marginally greater than for WC (5.1%). But these percentages cannot be directly compared, as the relationship between the measures is described by a regression equation with an intercept term that does not equal zero. The coefficient of time from the regression equation will determine whether or not WC is on average larger for a given BMI at the second compared with the first time point. Differences in the percentage change in WC and the percentage change in BMI cannot be usefully directly compared. Comparisons of increases in the two measures must account for the relationship between them as described by the regression equation.
    BMC Research Notes 05/2011; 4:145. DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-4-145
Show more