Chronotype and time-of-day influences on the alerting, orienting, and executive components of attention

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona Campus, 3000 Ivyside Park, Altoona, PA 16601, USA.
Experimental Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2.17). 10/2008; 192(2):189-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1567-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent research on attention has identified three separable components, known as alerting, orienting, and executive functioning, which are thought to be subserved by distinct neural networks. Despite systematic investigation into their relatedness to each other and to psychopathology, little is known about how these three networks might be modulated by such factors as time-of-day and chronotype. The present study administered the Attentional Network Test (ANT) and a self-report measure of alertness to 80 participants at 0800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 hours on the same day. Participants were also chronotyped with a morningness/eveningness questionnaire and divided into evening versus morning/neither-type groups; morning chronotypes tend to perform better early in the day, while evening chronotypes show enhanced performance later in the day. The results replicated the lack of any correlations between alerting, orienting, and executive functioning, supporting the independence of these three networks. There was an effect of time-of-day on executive functioning with higher conflict scores at 1200 and 1600 hours for both chronotypes. The efficiency of the orienting system did not change as a function of time-of-day or chronotype. The alerting measure, however, showed an interaction between time-of-day and chronotype such that alerting scores increased only for the morning/neither-type participants in the latter half of the day. There was also an interaction between time-of-day and chronotype for self-reported alertness, such that it increased during the first half of the day for all participants, but then decreased for morning/neither types (only) toward evening. This is the first report to examine changes in the trinity of attentional networks measured by the ANT throughout a normal day in a large group of normal participants, and it encourages more integration between chronobiology and cognitive neuroscience for both theoretical and practical reasons.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individual preferences in morningness-eveningness rhythms modulate temporal fluctuations of cognitive performance over a normal day. Besides enhanced cognitive performance at individual’s peak time as derived from morningness-eveningness questionnaires, a few studies have shown increased implicit memory abilities at a non-optimal time of day. Various subjective factors might also determine the clock time for high or low cognitive efficiency. Using an artificial grammar learning task, we show enhanced implicit learning of high-order information at non-optimal (versus optimal) time of day as subjectively defined by participants, irrespective of morningness-eveningness scores. Our results suggest that subjectively defined efficiency periods are a modulating factor in the testing of cognitive functions.
    Cortex 09/2014; 58. DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.006 · 6.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Confession evidence is highly incriminating in court. We examined the interaction between chronotype and time of day on the confession decisions of 60 participants using an experimental paradigm. Pre-identified morning-and evening-type people were randomly assigned to participate in morning or evening sessions. Results supported an interactional asynchrony hypothesis that individuals are more likely to confess during "off-peak'' periods (i.e., evening-types in the morning and morning-types in the evening). This interaction was obtained for both high-and low-seriousness transgressions. These results suggest that chronotype asynchrony constitutes a significant risk factor for false confessions and the wrongful convictions that often follow.
    Basic and Applied Social Psychology 07/2014; 36(4):321-328. DOI:10.1080/01973533.2014.917974 · 0.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Students suffering from subjective psychosomatic disorder often have basic lifestyle problems. We examined 30 healthy students aged 21–22 years old. Salivary samples were collected from the subjects at home five times per day (20:00, 24:00, 04:00, 08:00 and 12:00 h). We assessed melatonin secretion patterns by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay and cortisol secretion by ELISA. We assigned the subjects to regular, semi-regular and irregular circadian rhythm groups based on whether melatonin secretion was high until midnight. A self-assessment questionnaire addressing psychosomatic disorder was completed by the same students. The subjects rated their psychosomatic symptoms twice per day (08:00 and 20:00 h). The irregular group showed lower cortisol awakening response, but high cortisol concentrations at 12:00 h; this group also reported more subjective health complaints related to psychosomatic stress compared with the regular group. Our findings suggest that psychosomatic disorder is associated with circadian rhythms in Japanese students.
    Biological Rhythm Research 01/2014; 45(1). DOI:10.1080/09291016.2013.842380 · 1.22 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014