Recommendations for the identification of chronic hepatitis c virus infection among persons born during 1945–1965CDCMMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep20126113222695456

Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, USA.
MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control 08/2012; 61(RR-4):1-32.
Source: PubMed


Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Many of the 2.7-3.9 million persons living with HCV infection are unaware they are infected and do not receive care (e.g., education, counseling, and medical monitoring) and treatment. CDC estimates that although persons born during 1945-1965 comprise an estimated 27% of the population, they account for approximately three fourths of all HCV infections in the United States, 73% of HCV-associated mortality, and are at greatest risk for hepatocellular carcinoma and other HCV-related liver disease. With the advent of new therapies that can halt disease progression and provide a virologic cure (i.e., sustained viral clearance following completion of treatment) in most persons, targeted testing and linkage to care for infected persons in this birth cohort is expected to reduce HCV-related morbidity and mortality. CDC is augmenting previous recommendations for HCV testing (CDC. Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease. MMWR 1998;47[No. RR-19]) to recommend one-time testing without prior ascertainment of HCV risk for persons born during 1945-1965, a population with a disproportionately high prevalence of HCV infection and related disease. Persons identified as having HCV infection should receive a brief screening for alcohol use and intervention as clinically indicated, followed by referral to appropriate care for HCV infection and related conditions. These recommendations do not replace previous guidelines for HCV testing that are based on known risk factors and clinical indications. Rather, they define an additional target population for testing: persons born during 1945-1965. CDC developed these recommendations with the assistance of a work group representing diverse expertise and perspectives. The recommendations are informed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, an approach that provides guidance and tools to define the research questions, conduct the systematic review, assess the overall quality of the evidence, and determine strength of the recommendations. This report is intended to serve as a resource for health-care professionals, public health officials, and organizations involved in the development, implementation, and evaluation of prevention and clinical services. These recommendations will be reviewed every 5 years and updated to include advances in the published evidence.

23 Reads
  • Source
    • "Chronic HCV (CHC) infection is a global public-health problem, with approximately 170 million persons chronically infected [1] who are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality [2] due to liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and extra-hepatic complications that develop. The incidence of cirrhosis and HCC is projected to dramatically increase over the next decade in certain populations such as the U.S. "baby boomer" birth cohort. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Molecular tests that detect and/or quantify HCV RNA are important in the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) undergoing anti-viral therapy. The primary goal of anti-HCV therapy is to achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) defined as "undetectable" Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA in the serum or plasma at 12 to 24 weeks following the end of treatment. HCV RNA viral load (VL) monitoring is used to guide treatment duration where decisions can be made on-therapy and to determine whether or not to stop therapy. In addition, clinicians determine treatment regimen and duration based on the HCV genotype (1-6) as well as the kinetics of HCV RNA levels. As direct acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized hepatitis C treatment, they have also lead to new HCV RNA VL result interpretations. Further, the clinical decisions were different for pegylated-interferon/ribavirin (PEGα/RBV)+ boceprevir or telaprevir-containing regimens approved in 2011 (e.g. one requiring an additional 4 week "lead-in" with PEGα/RBV), each having different HCV RNA values for futility rules, created complexity in clinical decisions. The future pegylated-interferon free DAA- regimens promise significantly improved cure rates along with fixed durations and simpler treatment rules. The intent of this article is to discuss the role of HCV RNA real-time PCR tests used in the management of CHC patients in the past and how this is likely to change in the era of interferon free DAA regimens.
    BMC Infectious Diseases 09/2014; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S8. DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-14-S5-S8 · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "HCV has historically received little attention among public health authorities in the US largely due to limited funding. Viral hepatitis receives less than 3% of the funding HIV receives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).1 Some recent changes, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and new screening recommendations from the CDC and the US Preventive Health Services Task Force (USPSTF),4,5 provide a real opportunity to improve both screening and treatment of HCV. The ACA may increase the number of insured people in the US by as much as 30 million,4 with a principal focus on those with lower incomes and youth, two groups at elevated risk of HCV.6,7 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The US faces at least two distinct epidemics of hepatitis C virus infection (HCV), and due largely to revised screening recommendations and novel therapeutic agents, corresponding opportunities. As only 49%-75% of HCV-infected persons in the US are aware of their infection, any chance of addressing HCV in the US is dependent upon screening to identify undiagnosed infections. Most HCV in the US consists of longstanding infections among persons born during 1945-1965 who are suffering escalating rates of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Mathematical modeling supports aggressive action to reach and treat these persons to minimize the subsequent burden of advanced liver disease on patients and the health care system. Incident infection is primarily among persons who inject drugs, less than 10% of whom have been treated for HCV. Expanded screening and treatment of active persons who inject drugs raises the prospect of utilizing "treatment as prevention" to stem the tide of incident HCV infections in this population. HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) represent a population at risk for sexually transmitted HCV who may also benefit from adjusted screening guidelines to identify both acute and chronic infections. Prisoners also represent a critical population for aggressive screening and treatment. Finally, the two-stage testing algorithm for HCV diagnosis is problematic and difficult for patients and providers to navigate. While emerging therapeutics raise the prospect of reducing HCV-related morbidity and mortality, as well as eliminating new infections, major barriers remain with regard to identifying infections, improving access to treatment, and ensuring payer coverage of costly new therapeutic regimens.
    Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research 07/2014; 6:79-87. DOI:10.2147/HMER.S40940
  • Source
    • "The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Prevention Services (CDC) Task Force recommends routine anti-HCV testing for anyone who has injected drugs and one-time testing for adults born between 1945–1965 [19,20]. Testing for HCV may enhance prevention efforts, improve efforts to identify people eligible for treatment, and increase uptake into care [3,21-24]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background People who inject drugs (PWID) are at highest risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, yet many remain unaware of their infection status. New anti-HCV rapid testing has high potential to impact this. Methods Young adult (<30 years) active PWID were offered either the rapid OraQuick® or standard anti-HCV test involving phlebotomy, then asked to complete a short questionnaire about testing perceptions and preferences. Sample characteristics, service utilization, and injection risk exposures are assessed with the HCV testing choice as the outcome, testing preferences, and reasons for preference. Results Of 129 participants: 82.9% (n = 107) chose the rapid test. There were no significant differences between those who chose rapid vs. standard testing. A majority (60.2%) chose the rapid test for quick results; most (60.9%) felt the rapid test was accurate, and less painful (53.3%) than the tests involving venipuncture. Conclusions OraQuick® anti-HCV rapid test was widely accepted among young PWID. Our results substantiate the valuable potential of anti-HCV rapid testing for HCV screening in this high risk population.
    BMC Public Health 06/2014; 14(1):645. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-645 · 2.26 Impact Factor
Show more