Use of respiratory impedance in prehospital care of hypotensive patients associated with hemorrhage and trauma: A case series

Tactical Combat Casualty Care Research Program, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA.
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 08/2012; 73(2 Suppl 1):S54-9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182606124
Source: PubMed


The respiratory pump can be optimized to enhance circulation in patients with hypotension by having patients spontaneously breathe through a low level of inspiratory resistance. This can be achieved with an impedance threshold device (ITD) designed to provide 7 cm H2O resistance during spontaneous inspiration with minimal resistance during expiration. Little is known about the effects of harnessing this physiological concept to increase blood pressure (BP) in the prehospital setting of care for patients with hypotension caused by blood loss or trauma. In this case series, we report on the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of rapidly deploying the ITD by first responders to treat hypotension secondary to blood loss and trauma in the urban setting by emergency medical services personnel.
Hemodynamic data from hypotensive patients (pretreatment systolic BP [SBP] <100 mm Hg) from 3 U.S. cities where the ITD is deployed were evaluated. The primary end point was maximum change in SBP and diastolic BP (DBP) from before to during ITD use in patients with hypotension secondary to documented blood loss or trauma. Secondary end points were device tolerance, whether the patient felt "better," change in heart rate, O2 saturation, and adverse events.
Of the 255 hypotensive patients treated, there were 26 categorized with blood loss and 13 with trauma. In this 39-patient subgroup, the SBP and DBP (mean ± SD) increased from 79 ± 14 mm Hg and 48 ± 12 mm Hg before ITD placement to 110 ± 17 mm Hg and 66 ± 14 mm Hg after ITD placement (p < 0.001). Breathing through the ITD resulted in no reported adverse events, was well tolerated, and resulted in feeling "better" in more than 85% of the patients.
Use of an ITD by emergency medical services personnel on hypotensive spontaneously breathing patients secondary to blood loss and trauma increased SBP and DBP and was feasible, well tolerated, and not associated with adverse effects (e.g., increased bleeding).

1 Follower
6 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Impedance threshold device technology harnesses the patient's normal physiological mechanisms to increase circulation during hypotensive crises. We report the first clinical use of one version of this device on a spontaneously breathing hypotensive pregnant woman. Objective: The objective of our study was to report this case to help Emergency Medical Service rescue personnel to noninvasively treat hypotensive but conscious spontaneously breathing patients. Case report: A 28-year-old woman who was 21 weeks pregnant developed frank syncope at home but recovered spontaneously. When Emergency Medical Service paramedics arrived, her initial blood pressure and heart rate were 115/80 mm Hg and 125 beats/min, respectively. She suddenly complained of feeling anxious and developed profound bradycardia and hypotension, followed by 20 s of asystole. An impedance threshold device (ResQGARD™) with -7 cmH2O resistance to inspiration was rapidly applied using a facemask. After four spontaneous breaths, blood pressure increased from 62/40 mm Hg to 106/66 mm Hg. She was hemodynamically stable thereafter. Conclusions: In this case report, the multiple physiological effects of inspiration through -7 cmH2O resistance helped this pregnant hypotensive patient to rapidly and noninvasively restore adequate perfusion and reduced the duration of her hypotensive episode. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this technology in a pregnant hypotensive but spontaneously breathing patient.
    Journal of Emergency Medicine 06/2013; 45(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.03.036 · 0.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: One approach to improve outcomes after trauma and hemorrhage is to follow the principles of permissive hypotension by avoiding intravascular overpressure and thereby preventing dislodgement of platelet plugs early in the clotting process. We hypothesized that augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure (nITP) by treatment with an impedance threshold device would improve hemodynamics without compromising permissive hypotension or causing hemodilution, whereas aggressive fluid resuscitation with normal saline (NS) would result in hemodilution and SBPs that are too high for permissive hypotension and capable of clot dislodgement. Methods: Thirty-four spontaneously breathing anesthetized female pigs (30.6 ± 0.5 kg) were subjected to a fixed 55% hemorrhage over 30 minutes; block randomized to nITP, no treatment, or intravenous bolus of 1-L NS; and evaluated over 30 minutes. Results are reported as mean ± SEM. Results: Average systolic blood pressures (SBPs) (mm Hg) 30 minutes after the study interventions were as follows: nITP, 82.1 ± 2.9; no treatment, 69.4 ± 4.0; NS 89.3 ± 5.2. Maximum SBPs during the initial 15 minutes of treatment were as follows: nITP, 88.0 ± 4.3; no treatment, 70.8 ± 4.3; and NS, 131 ± 7.6. After 30 minutes, mean pulse pressure (mm Hg) was significantly higher in the nITP group (nITP, 32.3 ± 2.2) versus the no-treatment group (21.5 ± 1.5 controls) (p < 0.05), and the mean hematocrit was 25.2 ± 0.8 in the nITP group versus 19 ± 0.6 in the NS group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this porcine model of hemorrhagic shock, nITP therapy significantly improved SBP and pulse pressure for 30 minutes without overcompensation compared with controls with no treatment. By contrast, aggressive fluid resuscitation with NS but not nITP resulted in a significant rise in SBP to more than 100 mm Hg within minutes of initiating therapy that could cause a further reduction in hematocrit and clot dislodgment.
    Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 08/2013; 75(2):S203-S209. DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e318299d5d0 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Trauma is the leading cause of death during the first four decades of life in the developed countries. Its haemodynamic response underpins the patient's initial ability to survive, and the response to treatment and subsequent morbidity and resolution. Trauma causes a number of insults including haemorrhage, tissue injury (nociception) and, predominantly, in military casualties, blast from explosions. This article discusses aspects of the haemodynamic responses to these insults and subsequent treatment. 'Simple' haemorrhage (blood loss without significant volume of tissue damage) causes a biphasic response: mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) is initially maintained by the baroreflex (tachycardia and increased vascular resistance, Phase 1), followed by a sudden decrease in MAP initiated by a second reflex (decrease in vascular resistance and bradycardia, Phase 2). Phase 2 may be protective. The response to tissue injury attenuates Phase 2 and may cause a deleterious haemodynamic redistribution that compromises blood flow to some vital organs. In contrast, thoracic blast exposure augments Phase 2 of the response to haemorrhage. However, hypoxaemia from lung injury limits the effectiveness of hypotensive resuscitation by augmenting the attendant shock state. An alternative strategy ('hybrid resuscitation') whereby tissue perfusion is increased after the first hour of hypotensive resuscitation by adopting a revised normotensive target may ameliorate these problems. Finally, morphine also attenuates Phase 2 of the response to haemorrhage in some, but not all, species and this is associated with poor outcome. The impact on human patients is currently unknown and is the subject of a current physiological investigation.
    BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia 08/2014; 113(2):266-275. DOI:10.1093/bja/aeu232 · 4.85 Impact Factor
Show more