The neuroscience of suicidal behaviors: what can we expect from endophenotype strategies?

Department of Emergency Psychiatry, CHRU Montpellier, Inserm U1061, University of Montpellier I, Montpellier, France.
Translational Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 4.36). 05/2011; 1(5):e7. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2011.6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Vulnerability to suicidal behavior (SB) is likely mediated by an underlying genetic predisposition interacting with environmental and probable epigenetic factors throughout the lifespan to modify the function of neuronal circuits, thus rendering an individual more likely to engage in a suicidal act. Improving our understanding of the neuroscience underlying SBs, both attempts and completions, at all developmental stages is crucial for more effective preventive treatments and for better identification of vulnerable individuals. Recent studies have characterized SB using an endophenotype strategy, which aims to identify quantitative measures that reflect genetically influenced stable changes in brain function. In addition to aiding in the functional characterization of susceptibility genes, endophenotypic research strategies may have a wider impact in determining vulnerability to SB, as well as the translation of human findings to animal models, and vice versa. Endophenotypes associated with vulnerability to SB include impulsive/aggressive personality traits and disadvantageous decision making. Deficits in realistic risk evaluation represent key processes in vulnerability to SB. Serotonin dysfunction, indicated by neuroendocrine responses and neuroimaging, is also strongly implicated as a potential endophenotype and is linked with impulsive aggression and disadvantageous decision making. Specific endophenotypes may represent heritable markers for the identification of vulnerable patients and may be relevant targets for successful suicide prevention and treatments.


Available from: Irving Gottesman, Jun 15, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endophenotypes, measurable components unseen by the unaided eye along the pathway between disease or other phenotypes and distal genomics, have emerged as an important concept in the study of complex neuropsychiatric diseases. The term was introduced to psychopathology in 1972 by Gottesman and Shields, and reinvigorated in 2003 by Gottesman and Gould. An endophenotype may be neurophysiological, biochemical, endocrinological, neuroanatomical, cognitive, or neuropsychological (including configured self-report data) in nature. Endophenotypes represent simpler clues, in principle, to genetic underpinnings than the disease syndrome itself, thus promoting the prescient view embodied in the recent emphasis on new research domain criteria or RDoC that psychiatric diagnoses can be optimally deconstructed in ways that allow discovery of their etiology by focusing on endophenotypic dimensions rather than categories. Endophenotypes differ from other biomarkers in a number of ways, most importantly, they are heritable and thus not the consequence of disease. They are heuristic in the development of animal models of psychopathology. For example, genes implicated in humans can be knocked out or in to observe their effects on animal behaviors and their endophenotypes.Keywords:behavioral genetics;Gottesman, Irving;nature-nurture controversy;neuroscience;research domain criteria (RDoC);Shields, James;systems biology;bipolar;schizophrenia;suicide
    The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 01/2015: pages 1-8; , ISBN: 9781118625392
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a sample of 200 individuals diagnosed with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), we utilized the interpersonal-psychological theory for suicide as a framework to examine BDD behaviors that might be associated with suicide risk, insofar as they might increase the acquired capability for suicide. We predicted that physically painful BDD behaviors (e.g., cosmetic surgery, restrictive eating) would be associated with suicide attempts but not suicide-related ideation because these behaviors increase capability for, but not thoughts about, suicide. Our hypothesis was partially confirmed, as BDD-related restrictive food intake was associated with suicide attempts (but not suicide-related ideation) even after controlling for numerous covariates.
    Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 04/2012; 42(3):318-31. DOI:10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00093.x · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The endophenotype concept was first proposed as a strategy to use (purportedly) genetically simpler phenotypes in gene identification studies for psychiatric disorders, and is distinct from the closely related concept of intermediate phenotypes. In the area of alcohol use disorder (AUD) research, two candidate endophenotypes have produced replicable genetic associations: level of response to alcohol and neurophysiology markers (e.g., event-related oscillations and event-related potentials). Additional candidate endophenotypes from the cognitive, sensory, and neuroimaging literatures show promise, although more evidence is needed to fully evaluate their potential utility. Translational approaches have helped characterize the underlying neurobiology and genetics of AUD endophenotypes and identified relevant pharmacological interventions. Future research that capitalizes on the polygenic nature of endophenotypes and emphasizes endophenotypes that may change across development will enhance the usefulness of this concept to understand the genetically influenced pathways toward AUD.
    03/2015; 2(1):76-90. DOI:10.1007/s40429-015-0046-y