Article

Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9:374-386

Texas Back Institute, 6020 West Parker Road, Suite 200, Plano, TX 75093, USA.
The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society (Impact Factor: 2.8). 09/2009; 9(5):374-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The CHARITE artificial disc, a lumbar spinal arthroplasty device, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2004 based on two-year safety and effectiveness data from a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption (IDE) study. No long-term, randomized, prospective study on the CHARITE disc or any other artificial disc has been published to date.
The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness at the five-year follow-up time point of lumbar total disc replacement using the CHARITE artificial disc (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA) with that of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with BAK cages and iliac crest autograft, for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease from L4 to S1, unresponsive to nonoperative treatment.
Randomized controlled trial-five-year follow-up.
Ninety CHARITE patients and 43 BAK patients.
Self-reported measures: visual analog scale (VAS); validated Oswestry disability index (ODI version 1.0); Short-Form 36 Questionnaire, and patient satisfaction. Physiologic measures: radiographic range of motion, disc height, and segmental translation. Functional measures: work status.
Of the 375 subjects enrolled in the CHARITE IDE trial, 277 were eligible for the five-year study and 160 patients thereof completed the five-year follow-up. The completers included 133 randomized patients. Overall success was defined as improvement> or =15 pts in ODI vs. baseline, no device failure, absence of major complications, and maintenance or improvement of neurological status. Additional clinical outcomes included an ODI questionnaire as well as VAS, SF-36, and patient satisfaction surveys. Work status was tracked for all patients. Safety assessments included occurrence and severity of adverse events and device failures. Radiographic analyses such as index- and adjacent-level range of motion, segmental translation, disc height, and longitudinal ossification were also carried out.
Overall success was 57.8% in the CHARITE group vs. 51.2% in the BAK group (Blackwelder's test: p=0.0359, Delta=0.10). In addition, mean changes from baseline for ODI (CHARITE: -24.0 pts vs. BAK: -27.5 pts), VAS pain scores (CHARITE: -38.7 vs. BAK: -40.0), and SF-36 questionnaires (SF-36 Physical Component Scores [PCS]: CHARITE: 12.6 pts vs. BAK: 12.3 pts) were similar across groups. In patient satisfaction surveys, 78% of CHARITE patients were satisfied vs. 72% of BAK patients. A total of 65.6% patients in the CHARITE group vs. 46.5% patients in the BAK group were employed full-time. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.0403). Long-term disability was recorded for 8.0% of CHARITE patients and 20.9% of BAK patients, a difference that was also statistically significant (p=0.0441). Additional index-level surgery was performed in 7.7% of CHARITE patients and 16.3% of BAK patients. Radiographic findings included operative and adjacent-level range of motion (ROM), intervertebral disc height and segmental translation. At the five-year follow-up, the mean ROM at the index level was 6.0 degrees for CHARITE patients and 1.0 degrees for BAK patients. Changes in disc height were also similar for both CHARITE and BAK patients (0.7 mm for both groups, p=0.9827). Segmental translation was 0.4 and 0.8mm in patients implanted with CHARITE at L4-L5 vs. L5-S1, respectively, and 0.1mm in BAK patients.
The results of this five-year, prospective, randomized multicenter study are consistent with the two-year reports of noninferiority of CHARITE artificial disc vs. ALIF with BAK and iliac crest autograft. No statistical differences were found in clinical outcomes between groups. In addition, CHARITE patients reached a statistically greater rate of part- and full-time employment and a statistically lower rate of long-term disability, compared with BAK patients. Radiographically, the ROMs at index- and adjacent levels were not statistically different from those observed at two-years postsurgery.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Fred H Geisler, Aug 19, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
252 Views
  • Source
    • "Total disk replacements (TDRs) are a possible treatment to relieve discogenic low back pain. Current first-generation TDRs, like Charité and Prodisc, have not yet significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to fusion (Berg et al., 2009; Guyer et al., 2009; Zigler et al., 2007), still the gold-standard treatment. Concerns related to facet overloading, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and wear, hamper the widespread application of this new technique. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To improve the treatments for low back pain, new designs of total disk replacement have been proposed. The question is how well these designs can act as a functional replacement of the intervertebral disk. Four finite element models were made, for four different design concepts, to determine how well they can mimic the physiological intervertebral disk mechanical function. The four designs were a homogenous elastomer, a multi-stiffness elastomer, an elastomer with fiber jacket, and a hydrogel with fiber jacket. The best material properties of the four models were determined by optimizing the model behavior to match the behavior of the intervertebral disk in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. It was shown that neither a homogeneous elastomer nor a multi-stiffness elastomer could mimic the non-linear behavior within the physiological range of motion. Including a fiber jacket around an elastomer allowed for physiological motion in all degrees of freedom. Replacing the elastomer by a hydrogel yielded similar good behavior. Mimicking the non-linear behavior of the intervertebral disk, in the physiological range of motion is essential in maintaining and restoring spinal motion and in protecting surrounding tissues like the facet joints or adjacent segments. This was accomplished with designs mimicking the function of the annulus fibrosus.
    Journal of Biomechanics 01/2012; 45(1):134-40. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.09.017 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Previous reports demonstrated that high postoperative satisfactions (up to 83–99%) [3] [4] [5] have been achieved with TDRs in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration, and they also efficiently improved the clinical outcomes in both Visual Analogue Scales and Oswestry Scores [3,6–8]. Compared to conventional spinal fusion surgeries, the TDR technique with preserved segmental mobility allowed better long-term survivorship and lower complication rates from adjacent disease [9] [10] [11]. Nevertheless, from experience of general joint replacement techniques, it is clear that the problem of PE component failure remains unsolved. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Failure of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene components after total disc replacements in the lumbar spine has been reported in several retrieval studies, but immediate biomechanical evidence for those mechanical failures remained unclear. Current study aimed to investigate the failure mechanisms of commercial lumbar disc prostheses and to enhance the biomechanical performances of polyethylene components by modifying the articulating surface into a convex geometry. Modified compressive-shearing tests were utilized in finite element analyses for comparing the contact, tensile, and shearing stresses on two commercial disc prostheses and on a concave polyethylene design. The influence of radial clearance on stress distributions and prosthetic stability were considered. The modified compressive-shearing test revealed the possible mechanisms for transverse and radial cracks of polyethylene components, and would be helpful in observing the mechanical risks in the early design stage. Additionally, the concave polyethylene component exhibited lower contact and shearing stresses and more acceptable implant stability when compared with the convex polyethylene design through all radial clearances. Use of a concave polyethylene component in lumbar disc replacements decreased the risk of transverse and radial cracks, and also helped to maintain adequate stability. This design concept should be considered in lumbar disc implant designs in the future.
    Medical Engineering & Physics 09/2011; 34(4):498-505. DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.08.010 · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computer simulation of hypervelocity interaction of copper needle-like projectiles (with velocities in range: 10-15 km/s) with thin copper electrodes in a vacuum under different applied voltages (1-30 kV) and external circuit parameters was produced by using a two-dimensional thermoelectrohydrodynamical code. The nonlinear plasma-emissive processes-the generation and dynamics of so called cathode and anode ectons-are numerically investigated
    Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1996. Proceedings. ISDEIV., XVIIth International Symposium on; 08/1996
Show more