Do-not-resuscitate orders, quality of care, and outcomes in veterans with acute ischemic stroke

Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.29). 10/2012; 79(19). DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735ced
Source: PubMed


There is concern that do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders may lead to stroke patients receiving less aggressive treatment and poorer care. Our objectives were to assess the relationship between DNR orders and quality of stroke care among veterans.

A cohort of 3,965 acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to 131 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities in fiscal year 2007 underwent chart abstraction. DNR codes were identified through electronic orders or by documentation of "no code," "no cardiopulmonary resuscitation," or "no resuscitation." Quality of care was measured using 14 inpatient ischemic stroke quality indicators. The association between DNR orders and quality indicators was examined using multivariable logistic regression.

Among 3,965 ischemic stroke patients, 535 (13.5%) had DNR code status, 71% of whom had orders first documented within 1 day of admission. Overall, 4.9% of patients died in-hospital or were discharged to hospice; these outcomes were substantially higher in patients with DNR orders (29.7%), particularly if they were not documented until ≥2 days after admission (47.1%). Patients with DNR orders were significantly older, had more comorbidities, and had greater stroke severity. Following adjustment there were few significant associations between DNR status and the 14 quality indicators, with the exception of lower odds of early ambulation (odds ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval = 0.41-0.81) in DNR patients.

DNR orders were associated with limited differences in the select quality indicators investigated, which suggests that DNR orders did not impact quality of care. However, whether DNR orders influence treatment decisions that more directly affect survival remains to be determined.

1 Follower
7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical decision-making in stroke patients can be complex and often involves ethical challenges, from the perspective of healthcare providers as well as patients and their families. Awareness of these challenges and knowledge of current ethical topics in stroke may improve the quality of care provided to stroke patients. Predictive scores are increasingly available to estimate prognosis following stroke, though their usefulness in decision-making for individual patients remains unclear. Medical decisions requiring a surrogate decision-maker can be challenging; surrogates may also be susceptible to systematic biases in their decision-making. Variations in care are common and possibly related to under-utilization or over-utilization of resources. However, patient preferences may explain some of the variability as well. Early mortality may be related to patient and family preferences regarding life-sustaining measures rather than the provision of care that is not well tolerated or evidence-based. Ethical challenges are common in the care of stroke patients. An effective understanding of these topics is essential for clinicians to deliver patient-centered, preference-sensitive care.
    Current opinion in neurology 11/2013; 27(1). DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000048 · 5.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In face of any severe stroke, the questions for health professionals in charge of the patient are: will the handicap be acceptable for the patient? But can we predict an acceptable handicap for the patient? For his family? When we know that the cognitive disorders, consequences of severe stroke often modify, in a major way, the behaviour of these patients? Given these difficulties for estimate vital and functional prognosis and even more the quality of life of patients with severe stroke, collective reflexions between physicians and nurses are essential, reflexions taking into account preferences and values of patients. Use of resuscitation resources for severe stroke patients implies to offer then the best rehabilitation. So, questions about health pathways for severe stroke are essential: which structures for these patients, which technologies, which medical, medico-social and social supports, which human accompaniment the society can propose to the patients and to their family, so that they have an acceptable quality of life.
    Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation 01/2014; 33(2). DOI:10.1016/j.annfar.2013.12.002 · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Decisions on life-sustaining treatments and the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders can affect early mortality after stroke. We investigated the variation in early DNR use after stroke among hospitals in California and the effect of this variation on mortality-based hospital classifications. Using the California State Inpatient Database from 2005 to 2011, ischemic stroke admissions for patients aged ≥50 years were identified. Cases were categorized by the presence or the absence of DNR orders within the first 24 hours of admission. Multilevel logistic regression models with a random hospital intercept were used to predict inpatient mortality after adjusting for comorbidities, vascular risk factors, and demographics. Hospital mortality rank order was assigned based on this model and compared with the results of a second model that included DNR status. From 355 hospitals, 252 368 cases were identified, including 33 672 (13.3%) with early DNR. Hospital-level-adjusted use of DNR varied widely (quintile 1, 2.2% versus quintile 5, 23.2%). Hospitals with higher early DNR use had higher inpatient mortality because inpatient mortality more than doubled from quintile 1 (4.2%) to quintile 5 (8.7%). Failure to adjust for DNR orders resulted in substantial hospital reclassification across the rank spectrum, including among high mortality hospitals. There is wide variation in the hospital-level proportion of ischemic stroke patients with early DNR orders; this variation affects hospital mortality estimates. Unless the circumstances of early DNR orders are better understood, mortality-based hospital comparisons may not reliably identify hospitals providing a lower quality of care.
    Stroke 02/2014; 45(3). DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004573 · 5.72 Impact Factor
Show more