Epidemiology of a Mumps Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Island Population and Use of a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine for Outbreak Control- Guam 2009-2010.

1.National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 2.Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, GA 3.Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services, Guam, USA 4.Guam Memorial Hospital, Guam, USA 5.Guam Department of Education, Guam, USA 6.Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, CDC, Atlanta, GA 7.Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA.
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (Impact Factor: 3.14). 10/2012; 32(4). DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318279f593
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND:: Despite high two-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage, a large mumps outbreak occurred on the U.S. Territory of Guam during 2009-2010, primarily in school-aged children. METHODS:: We implemented active surveillance in April 2010 during the outbreak peak and characterized the outbreak epidemiology. We administered third doses of MMR vaccine to eligible students aged 9-14 years in 7 schools with the highest attack rates (ARs) between 5/18/2010-5/21/2010. Baseline surveys, follow-up surveys, and case-reports were used to determine mumps vaccine ARs. Adverse events post-vaccination were monitored. RESULTS:: Between 12/1/2009-12/31/2010, 505 mumps cases were reported. Self-reported Pohnpeians and Chuukese had the highest relative risks (54.7 and 19.7, respectively) and highest crowding indices (mean: 3.1 and 3.0 persons/bedroom, respectively). Among 287 (57%) school-aged case-patients, 270 (93%) had ≥2 MMR doses. A third MMR dose was administered to 1068 (33%) eligible students. Three-dose vaccinated students had an AR of 0.9/1000 compared with 2.4/1000 among students vaccinated with ≤2 doses more than1 incubation period pos-intervention, but the difference was not significant (p= 0.67). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS:: This mumps outbreak occurred in a highly vaccinated population. The highest ARs occurred in ethnic minority populations with the highest household crowding indices. After the third dose MMR intervention in highly affected schools, three-dose recipients had an AR 60% lower than students with ≤2 doses, but the difference was not statistically significant and the intervention occurred after the outbreak peaked. This outbreak may have persisted due to crowding at home and high student contact rates.

Download full-text


Available from: William Joseph Bellini, Feb 28, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2009-2010, we investigated a mumps outbreak among a highly vaccinated Orthodox Jewish population in a village in Orange County (OC), New York, to identify risk factors associated with mumps transmission among persons with two doses of mumps-containing vaccine. Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics were collected on students in grades 6-12 in three schools. A mumps case was defined as a student, who self-reported parotitis, orchitis, jaw swelling, and/or a mumps-related complication or whose mumps illness was reported to the OC Health Department during September 1, 2009-January 18, 2010. Log-binomial regression analyses were conducted separately for boys and girls as they attended different schools and had different hours of study. Of the 2503 students with two documented doses of mumps-containing vaccine, 320 (13%) developed mumps. Risk of mumps increased with increasing number of mumps cases in the class [≥8versus ≤3 cases: boys aRR=3.1 (95% CI: 2.0-5.0); girls aRR=2.6 (95% CI: 1.6-4.1)] and household [>1 versus 0 cases: boys aRR=4.3 (95%CI: 3.7-5.6); girls aRR=10.1 (95%CI: 7.1-14.3)]. Age at first dose, time since last dose, time between first and second dose, school, class size, number of hours at school per week, and household size were not significantly associated with having mumps. Two doses of mumps-containing vaccine may not be as effective in outbreak settings with multiple, prolonged, and intense exposure. Additional studies are required to understand why such mumps outbreaks occur and how they can be prevented in the future.
    The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 08/2013; 33(2). DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000000020 · 3.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is not recommended for mumps postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), data on its effectiveness are limited. During the 2009-2010 mumps outbreak in the northeastern United States, we assessed effectiveness of PEP with a third dose of MMR vaccine among contacts in Orthodox Jewish households who were given a third dose within 5 days of mumps onset in the household's index patient. We compared mumps attack rates between persons who received a third MMR dose during the first incubation period after onset in the index patient and 2-dose vaccinated persons who had not. Twenty-eight (11.7%) of 239 eligible household members received a third MMR dose as PEP. Mumps attack rates were 0% among third-dose recipients versus 5.2% among 2-dose recipients without PEP (p = 0.57). Although a third MMR dose administered as PEP did not have a significant effect, it may offer some benefits in specific outbreak contexts.
    Emerging Infectious Diseases 09/2013; 19(9):1411-7. DOI:10.3201/eid1909.130299 · 7.33 Impact Factor
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 10/2013; 32(10):1156-7. DOI:10.1097/INF.0b013e31829aa51b · 3.14 Impact Factor